Kerr, Z Y; Mihalik, J P; Guskiewicz, K M; Rosamond, W D; Evenson, K R; Marshall, S W
Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes Journal Article
In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 606–613, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, athlete, Athletes, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, cohort analysis, Cohort Studies, comparative study, concurrent validity, Concussion, EPIDEMIOLOGY, Female, human, Humans, injury, interpersonal communication, medical record, MEDICAL records, Mental Recall, psychology, recall, self report, sex difference, Sex Factors, traumatic brain injury, Truth Disclosure, Universities, university
@article{Kerr2015,
title = {Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes},
author = {Kerr, Z Y and Mihalik, J P and Guskiewicz, K M and Rosamond, W D and Evenson, K R and Marshall, S W},
doi = {10.1177/0363546514562180},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Sports Medicine},
volume = {43},
number = {3},
pages = {606--613},
abstract = {Background: Athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories have been used in research on former athletes, but both have limitations. Comparisons of these 2 types of concussion histories are needed to improve the accuracy of estimates of concussion history for future research and clinical care. Purpose: To estimate the agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories during college and to explore reasons for differences. Study: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Athlete-recalled concussion histories were provided by a convenience sample of 130 former collegiate athletes using an online questionnaire, and they were individually linked to previously collected clinical data that tracked medically diagnosed concussions at the host institution from 1996 to 2012. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was used to assess agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess reasons for disagreement. Results: Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories was low (ICC2},
keywords = {adult, athlete, Athletes, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, cohort analysis, Cohort Studies, comparative study, concurrent validity, Concussion, EPIDEMIOLOGY, Female, human, Humans, injury, interpersonal communication, medical record, MEDICAL records, Mental Recall, psychology, recall, self report, sex difference, Sex Factors, traumatic brain injury, Truth Disclosure, Universities, university},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bondi, C O; Semple, B D; Noble-Haeusslein, L J; Osier, N D; Carlson, S W; Dixon, C E; Giza, C C; Kline, A E
Found in translation: Understanding the biology and behavior of experimental traumatic brain injury Journal Article
In: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 58, pp. 123–146, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: 8 hydroxy 2 propylaminotetralin, Aggression, Attentional set-shifting test (AST), buspirone, Closed head injury, cognition, cognitive defect, cognitive function test, Concussion, conditioning, Controlled cortical impact (CCI), environmental enrichment, Environmental enrichment (EE), executive function, experimental disease, fear, Fluid percussion (FP), human, interpersonal communication, Memory, motor function test, nerve degeneration, neuropsychological test, Neurorehabilitation, nonhuman, outcome assessment, Pathophysiology, pediatrics, priority journal, rehabilitation care, Review, rodent, rotarod test, sensorimotor function, Social behavior, social disability, social interaction, spatial learning, TASK performance, traumatic brain injury
@article{Bondi2015,
title = {Found in translation: Understanding the biology and behavior of experimental traumatic brain injury},
author = {Bondi, C O and Semple, B D and Noble-Haeusslein, L J and Osier, N D and Carlson, S W and Dixon, C E and Giza, C C and Kline, A E},
doi = {10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.004},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews},
volume = {58},
pages = {123--146},
abstract = {The aim of this review is to discuss in greater detail the topics covered in the recent symposium entitled "Traumatic brain injury: laboratory and clinical perspectives," presented at the 2014 International Behavioral Neuroscience Society annual meeting. Herein, we review contemporary laboratory models of traumatic brain injury (TBI) including common assays for sensorimotor and cognitive behavior. New modalities to evaluate social behavior after injury to the developing brain, as well as the attentional set-shifting test (AST) as a measure of executive function in TBI, will be highlighted. Environmental enrichment (EE) will be discussed as a preclinical model of neurorehabilitation, and finally, an evidence-based approach to sports-related concussion will be considered. The review consists predominantly of published data, but some discussion of ongoing or future directions is provided. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.},
keywords = {8 hydroxy 2 propylaminotetralin, Aggression, Attentional set-shifting test (AST), buspirone, Closed head injury, cognition, cognitive defect, cognitive function test, Concussion, conditioning, Controlled cortical impact (CCI), environmental enrichment, Environmental enrichment (EE), executive function, experimental disease, fear, Fluid percussion (FP), human, interpersonal communication, Memory, motor function test, nerve degeneration, neuropsychological test, Neurorehabilitation, nonhuman, outcome assessment, Pathophysiology, pediatrics, priority journal, rehabilitation care, Review, rodent, rotarod test, sensorimotor function, Social behavior, social disability, social interaction, spatial learning, TASK performance, traumatic brain injury},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Kerr, Z Y; Mihalik, J P; Guskiewicz, K M; Rosamond, W D; Evenson, K R; Marshall, S W
Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes Journal Article
In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 606–613, 2015.
@article{Kerr2015,
title = {Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes},
author = {Kerr, Z Y and Mihalik, J P and Guskiewicz, K M and Rosamond, W D and Evenson, K R and Marshall, S W},
doi = {10.1177/0363546514562180},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Sports Medicine},
volume = {43},
number = {3},
pages = {606--613},
abstract = {Background: Athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories have been used in research on former athletes, but both have limitations. Comparisons of these 2 types of concussion histories are needed to improve the accuracy of estimates of concussion history for future research and clinical care. Purpose: To estimate the agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories during college and to explore reasons for differences. Study: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Athlete-recalled concussion histories were provided by a convenience sample of 130 former collegiate athletes using an online questionnaire, and they were individually linked to previously collected clinical data that tracked medically diagnosed concussions at the host institution from 1996 to 2012. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was used to assess agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess reasons for disagreement. Results: Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories was low (ICC2},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bondi, C O; Semple, B D; Noble-Haeusslein, L J; Osier, N D; Carlson, S W; Dixon, C E; Giza, C C; Kline, A E
Found in translation: Understanding the biology and behavior of experimental traumatic brain injury Journal Article
In: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 58, pp. 123–146, 2015.
@article{Bondi2015,
title = {Found in translation: Understanding the biology and behavior of experimental traumatic brain injury},
author = {Bondi, C O and Semple, B D and Noble-Haeusslein, L J and Osier, N D and Carlson, S W and Dixon, C E and Giza, C C and Kline, A E},
doi = {10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.004},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews},
volume = {58},
pages = {123--146},
abstract = {The aim of this review is to discuss in greater detail the topics covered in the recent symposium entitled "Traumatic brain injury: laboratory and clinical perspectives," presented at the 2014 International Behavioral Neuroscience Society annual meeting. Herein, we review contemporary laboratory models of traumatic brain injury (TBI) including common assays for sensorimotor and cognitive behavior. New modalities to evaluate social behavior after injury to the developing brain, as well as the attentional set-shifting test (AST) as a measure of executive function in TBI, will be highlighted. Environmental enrichment (EE) will be discussed as a preclinical model of neurorehabilitation, and finally, an evidence-based approach to sports-related concussion will be considered. The review consists predominantly of published data, but some discussion of ongoing or future directions is provided. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Kerr, Z Y; Mihalik, J P; Guskiewicz, K M; Rosamond, W D; Evenson, K R; Marshall, S W
Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes Journal Article
In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 606–613, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, athlete, Athletes, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, cohort analysis, Cohort Studies, comparative study, concurrent validity, Concussion, EPIDEMIOLOGY, Female, human, Humans, injury, interpersonal communication, medical record, MEDICAL records, Mental Recall, psychology, recall, self report, sex difference, Sex Factors, traumatic brain injury, Truth Disclosure, Universities, university
@article{Kerr2015,
title = {Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes},
author = {Kerr, Z Y and Mihalik, J P and Guskiewicz, K M and Rosamond, W D and Evenson, K R and Marshall, S W},
doi = {10.1177/0363546514562180},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Sports Medicine},
volume = {43},
number = {3},
pages = {606--613},
abstract = {Background: Athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories have been used in research on former athletes, but both have limitations. Comparisons of these 2 types of concussion histories are needed to improve the accuracy of estimates of concussion history for future research and clinical care. Purpose: To estimate the agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories during college and to explore reasons for differences. Study: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Athlete-recalled concussion histories were provided by a convenience sample of 130 former collegiate athletes using an online questionnaire, and they were individually linked to previously collected clinical data that tracked medically diagnosed concussions at the host institution from 1996 to 2012. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was used to assess agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess reasons for disagreement. Results: Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories was low (ICC2},
keywords = {adult, athlete, Athletes, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, cohort analysis, Cohort Studies, comparative study, concurrent validity, Concussion, EPIDEMIOLOGY, Female, human, Humans, injury, interpersonal communication, medical record, MEDICAL records, Mental Recall, psychology, recall, self report, sex difference, Sex Factors, traumatic brain injury, Truth Disclosure, Universities, university},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bondi, C O; Semple, B D; Noble-Haeusslein, L J; Osier, N D; Carlson, S W; Dixon, C E; Giza, C C; Kline, A E
Found in translation: Understanding the biology and behavior of experimental traumatic brain injury Journal Article
In: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 58, pp. 123–146, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: 8 hydroxy 2 propylaminotetralin, Aggression, Attentional set-shifting test (AST), buspirone, Closed head injury, cognition, cognitive defect, cognitive function test, Concussion, conditioning, Controlled cortical impact (CCI), environmental enrichment, Environmental enrichment (EE), executive function, experimental disease, fear, Fluid percussion (FP), human, interpersonal communication, Memory, motor function test, nerve degeneration, neuropsychological test, Neurorehabilitation, nonhuman, outcome assessment, Pathophysiology, pediatrics, priority journal, rehabilitation care, Review, rodent, rotarod test, sensorimotor function, Social behavior, social disability, social interaction, spatial learning, TASK performance, traumatic brain injury
@article{Bondi2015,
title = {Found in translation: Understanding the biology and behavior of experimental traumatic brain injury},
author = {Bondi, C O and Semple, B D and Noble-Haeusslein, L J and Osier, N D and Carlson, S W and Dixon, C E and Giza, C C and Kline, A E},
doi = {10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.004},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews},
volume = {58},
pages = {123--146},
abstract = {The aim of this review is to discuss in greater detail the topics covered in the recent symposium entitled "Traumatic brain injury: laboratory and clinical perspectives," presented at the 2014 International Behavioral Neuroscience Society annual meeting. Herein, we review contemporary laboratory models of traumatic brain injury (TBI) including common assays for sensorimotor and cognitive behavior. New modalities to evaluate social behavior after injury to the developing brain, as well as the attentional set-shifting test (AST) as a measure of executive function in TBI, will be highlighted. Environmental enrichment (EE) will be discussed as a preclinical model of neurorehabilitation, and finally, an evidence-based approach to sports-related concussion will be considered. The review consists predominantly of published data, but some discussion of ongoing or future directions is provided. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.},
keywords = {8 hydroxy 2 propylaminotetralin, Aggression, Attentional set-shifting test (AST), buspirone, Closed head injury, cognition, cognitive defect, cognitive function test, Concussion, conditioning, Controlled cortical impact (CCI), environmental enrichment, Environmental enrichment (EE), executive function, experimental disease, fear, Fluid percussion (FP), human, interpersonal communication, Memory, motor function test, nerve degeneration, neuropsychological test, Neurorehabilitation, nonhuman, outcome assessment, Pathophysiology, pediatrics, priority journal, rehabilitation care, Review, rodent, rotarod test, sensorimotor function, Social behavior, social disability, social interaction, spatial learning, TASK performance, traumatic brain injury},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}