Kerr, Z Y; Mihalik, J P; Guskiewicz, K M; Rosamond, W D; Evenson, K R; Marshall, S W
Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes Journal Article
In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 606–613, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, athlete, Athletes, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, cohort analysis, Cohort Studies, comparative study, concurrent validity, Concussion, EPIDEMIOLOGY, Female, human, Humans, injury, interpersonal communication, medical record, MEDICAL records, Mental Recall, psychology, recall, self report, sex difference, Sex Factors, traumatic brain injury, Truth Disclosure, Universities, university
@article{Kerr2015,
title = {Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes},
author = {Kerr, Z Y and Mihalik, J P and Guskiewicz, K M and Rosamond, W D and Evenson, K R and Marshall, S W},
doi = {10.1177/0363546514562180},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Sports Medicine},
volume = {43},
number = {3},
pages = {606--613},
abstract = {Background: Athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories have been used in research on former athletes, but both have limitations. Comparisons of these 2 types of concussion histories are needed to improve the accuracy of estimates of concussion history for future research and clinical care. Purpose: To estimate the agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories during college and to explore reasons for differences. Study: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Athlete-recalled concussion histories were provided by a convenience sample of 130 former collegiate athletes using an online questionnaire, and they were individually linked to previously collected clinical data that tracked medically diagnosed concussions at the host institution from 1996 to 2012. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was used to assess agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess reasons for disagreement. Results: Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories was low (ICC2},
keywords = {adult, athlete, Athletes, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, cohort analysis, Cohort Studies, comparative study, concurrent validity, Concussion, EPIDEMIOLOGY, Female, human, Humans, injury, interpersonal communication, medical record, MEDICAL records, Mental Recall, psychology, recall, self report, sex difference, Sex Factors, traumatic brain injury, Truth Disclosure, Universities, university},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Falconer, E K; Geffen, G M; Olsen, S L; McFarland, K
The rapid screen of concussion: an evaluation of the non-word repetition test for use in mTBI research Journal Article
In: Brain Injury, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1251–1263, 2006.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], *Mass Screening/mt [Methods], *Neuropsychological Tests, Adolescent, adult, Brain Concussion/et [Etiology], Brain Concussion/px [Psychology], Brain Injuries/co [Complications], Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], Female, Humans, Male, Mental Recall, middle aged, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Verbal Learning
@article{Falconer2006,
title = {The rapid screen of concussion: an evaluation of the non-word repetition test for use in mTBI research},
author = {Falconer, E K and Geffen, G M and Olsen, S L and McFarland, K},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
journal = {Brain Injury},
volume = {20},
number = {12},
pages = {1251--1263},
abstract = {PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: (1) To investigate the Nonword Repetition test (NWR) as an index of sub-vocal rehearsal deficits after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI); (2) to assess the reliability, validity and sensitivity of the NWR; and (3) to compare the NWR to more sensitive tests of verbal memory. RESEARCH DESIGN: An independent groups design. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Study 1 administered the NWR to 46 mTBI and 61 uninjured controls with the Rapid Screen of Concussion (RSC). Study 2 compared mTBI, orthopaedic and uninjured participants on the NWR and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT-R). MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: The NWR did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of the RSC. However, it is reliable and indexes sub-vocal rehearsal speed. These findings provide evidence that although the current form of the NWR lacks sensitivity to the impact of mTBI, the development of a more sensitive test of sub-vocal rehearsal deficits following mTBI is warranted.},
keywords = {*Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], *Mass Screening/mt [Methods], *Neuropsychological Tests, Adolescent, adult, Brain Concussion/et [Etiology], Brain Concussion/px [Psychology], Brain Injuries/co [Complications], Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], Female, Humans, Male, Mental Recall, middle aged, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Verbal Learning},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Kerr, Z Y; Mihalik, J P; Guskiewicz, K M; Rosamond, W D; Evenson, K R; Marshall, S W
Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes Journal Article
In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 606–613, 2015.
@article{Kerr2015,
title = {Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes},
author = {Kerr, Z Y and Mihalik, J P and Guskiewicz, K M and Rosamond, W D and Evenson, K R and Marshall, S W},
doi = {10.1177/0363546514562180},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Sports Medicine},
volume = {43},
number = {3},
pages = {606--613},
abstract = {Background: Athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories have been used in research on former athletes, but both have limitations. Comparisons of these 2 types of concussion histories are needed to improve the accuracy of estimates of concussion history for future research and clinical care. Purpose: To estimate the agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories during college and to explore reasons for differences. Study: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Athlete-recalled concussion histories were provided by a convenience sample of 130 former collegiate athletes using an online questionnaire, and they were individually linked to previously collected clinical data that tracked medically diagnosed concussions at the host institution from 1996 to 2012. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was used to assess agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess reasons for disagreement. Results: Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories was low (ICC2},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Falconer, E K; Geffen, G M; Olsen, S L; McFarland, K
The rapid screen of concussion: an evaluation of the non-word repetition test for use in mTBI research Journal Article
In: Brain Injury, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1251–1263, 2006.
@article{Falconer2006,
title = {The rapid screen of concussion: an evaluation of the non-word repetition test for use in mTBI research},
author = {Falconer, E K and Geffen, G M and Olsen, S L and McFarland, K},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
journal = {Brain Injury},
volume = {20},
number = {12},
pages = {1251--1263},
abstract = {PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: (1) To investigate the Nonword Repetition test (NWR) as an index of sub-vocal rehearsal deficits after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI); (2) to assess the reliability, validity and sensitivity of the NWR; and (3) to compare the NWR to more sensitive tests of verbal memory. RESEARCH DESIGN: An independent groups design. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Study 1 administered the NWR to 46 mTBI and 61 uninjured controls with the Rapid Screen of Concussion (RSC). Study 2 compared mTBI, orthopaedic and uninjured participants on the NWR and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT-R). MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: The NWR did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of the RSC. However, it is reliable and indexes sub-vocal rehearsal speed. These findings provide evidence that although the current form of the NWR lacks sensitivity to the impact of mTBI, the development of a more sensitive test of sub-vocal rehearsal deficits following mTBI is warranted.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Kerr, Z Y; Mihalik, J P; Guskiewicz, K M; Rosamond, W D; Evenson, K R; Marshall, S W
Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes Journal Article
In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 606–613, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, athlete, Athletes, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, cohort analysis, Cohort Studies, comparative study, concurrent validity, Concussion, EPIDEMIOLOGY, Female, human, Humans, injury, interpersonal communication, medical record, MEDICAL records, Mental Recall, psychology, recall, self report, sex difference, Sex Factors, traumatic brain injury, Truth Disclosure, Universities, university
@article{Kerr2015,
title = {Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes},
author = {Kerr, Z Y and Mihalik, J P and Guskiewicz, K M and Rosamond, W D and Evenson, K R and Marshall, S W},
doi = {10.1177/0363546514562180},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Sports Medicine},
volume = {43},
number = {3},
pages = {606--613},
abstract = {Background: Athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories have been used in research on former athletes, but both have limitations. Comparisons of these 2 types of concussion histories are needed to improve the accuracy of estimates of concussion history for future research and clinical care. Purpose: To estimate the agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories during college and to explore reasons for differences. Study: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Athlete-recalled concussion histories were provided by a convenience sample of 130 former collegiate athletes using an online questionnaire, and they were individually linked to previously collected clinical data that tracked medically diagnosed concussions at the host institution from 1996 to 2012. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was used to assess agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess reasons for disagreement. Results: Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories was low (ICC2},
keywords = {adult, athlete, Athletes, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, cohort analysis, Cohort Studies, comparative study, concurrent validity, Concussion, EPIDEMIOLOGY, Female, human, Humans, injury, interpersonal communication, medical record, MEDICAL records, Mental Recall, psychology, recall, self report, sex difference, Sex Factors, traumatic brain injury, Truth Disclosure, Universities, university},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Falconer, E K; Geffen, G M; Olsen, S L; McFarland, K
The rapid screen of concussion: an evaluation of the non-word repetition test for use in mTBI research Journal Article
In: Brain Injury, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1251–1263, 2006.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], *Mass Screening/mt [Methods], *Neuropsychological Tests, Adolescent, adult, Brain Concussion/et [Etiology], Brain Concussion/px [Psychology], Brain Injuries/co [Complications], Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], Female, Humans, Male, Mental Recall, middle aged, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Verbal Learning
@article{Falconer2006,
title = {The rapid screen of concussion: an evaluation of the non-word repetition test for use in mTBI research},
author = {Falconer, E K and Geffen, G M and Olsen, S L and McFarland, K},
year = {2006},
date = {2006-01-01},
journal = {Brain Injury},
volume = {20},
number = {12},
pages = {1251--1263},
abstract = {PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: (1) To investigate the Nonword Repetition test (NWR) as an index of sub-vocal rehearsal deficits after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI); (2) to assess the reliability, validity and sensitivity of the NWR; and (3) to compare the NWR to more sensitive tests of verbal memory. RESEARCH DESIGN: An independent groups design. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Study 1 administered the NWR to 46 mTBI and 61 uninjured controls with the Rapid Screen of Concussion (RSC). Study 2 compared mTBI, orthopaedic and uninjured participants on the NWR and the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT-R). MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: The NWR did not improve the diagnostic accuracy of the RSC. However, it is reliable and indexes sub-vocal rehearsal speed. These findings provide evidence that although the current form of the NWR lacks sensitivity to the impact of mTBI, the development of a more sensitive test of sub-vocal rehearsal deficits following mTBI is warranted.},
keywords = {*Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], *Mass Screening/mt [Methods], *Neuropsychological Tests, Adolescent, adult, Brain Concussion/et [Etiology], Brain Concussion/px [Psychology], Brain Injuries/co [Complications], Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], Female, Humans, Male, Mental Recall, middle aged, Reproducibility of Results, Sensitivity and Specificity, Verbal Learning},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}