Kerr, Z Y; Mihalik, J P; Guskiewicz, K M; Rosamond, W D; Evenson, K R; Marshall, S W
Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes Journal Article
In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 606–613, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, athlete, Athletes, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, cohort analysis, Cohort Studies, comparative study, concurrent validity, Concussion, EPIDEMIOLOGY, Female, human, Humans, injury, interpersonal communication, medical record, MEDICAL records, Mental Recall, psychology, recall, self report, sex difference, Sex Factors, traumatic brain injury, Truth Disclosure, Universities, university
@article{Kerr2015,
title = {Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes},
author = {Kerr, Z Y and Mihalik, J P and Guskiewicz, K M and Rosamond, W D and Evenson, K R and Marshall, S W},
doi = {10.1177/0363546514562180},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Sports Medicine},
volume = {43},
number = {3},
pages = {606--613},
abstract = {Background: Athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories have been used in research on former athletes, but both have limitations. Comparisons of these 2 types of concussion histories are needed to improve the accuracy of estimates of concussion history for future research and clinical care. Purpose: To estimate the agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories during college and to explore reasons for differences. Study: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Athlete-recalled concussion histories were provided by a convenience sample of 130 former collegiate athletes using an online questionnaire, and they were individually linked to previously collected clinical data that tracked medically diagnosed concussions at the host institution from 1996 to 2012. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was used to assess agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess reasons for disagreement. Results: Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories was low (ICC2},
keywords = {adult, athlete, Athletes, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, cohort analysis, Cohort Studies, comparative study, concurrent validity, Concussion, EPIDEMIOLOGY, Female, human, Humans, injury, interpersonal communication, medical record, MEDICAL records, Mental Recall, psychology, recall, self report, sex difference, Sex Factors, traumatic brain injury, Truth Disclosure, Universities, university},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Kerr, Z Y; Mihalik, J P; Guskiewicz, K M; Rosamond, W D; Evenson, K R; Marshall, S W
Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes Journal Article
In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 606–613, 2015.
@article{Kerr2015,
title = {Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes},
author = {Kerr, Z Y and Mihalik, J P and Guskiewicz, K M and Rosamond, W D and Evenson, K R and Marshall, S W},
doi = {10.1177/0363546514562180},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Sports Medicine},
volume = {43},
number = {3},
pages = {606--613},
abstract = {Background: Athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories have been used in research on former athletes, but both have limitations. Comparisons of these 2 types of concussion histories are needed to improve the accuracy of estimates of concussion history for future research and clinical care. Purpose: To estimate the agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories during college and to explore reasons for differences. Study: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Athlete-recalled concussion histories were provided by a convenience sample of 130 former collegiate athletes using an online questionnaire, and they were individually linked to previously collected clinical data that tracked medically diagnosed concussions at the host institution from 1996 to 2012. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was used to assess agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess reasons for disagreement. Results: Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories was low (ICC2},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Kerr, Z Y; Mihalik, J P; Guskiewicz, K M; Rosamond, W D; Evenson, K R; Marshall, S W
Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes Journal Article
In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 606–613, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, athlete, Athletes, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, cohort analysis, Cohort Studies, comparative study, concurrent validity, Concussion, EPIDEMIOLOGY, Female, human, Humans, injury, interpersonal communication, medical record, MEDICAL records, Mental Recall, psychology, recall, self report, sex difference, Sex Factors, traumatic brain injury, Truth Disclosure, Universities, university
@article{Kerr2015,
title = {Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories in former collegiate athletes},
author = {Kerr, Z Y and Mihalik, J P and Guskiewicz, K M and Rosamond, W D and Evenson, K R and Marshall, S W},
doi = {10.1177/0363546514562180},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Sports Medicine},
volume = {43},
number = {3},
pages = {606--613},
abstract = {Background: Athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories have been used in research on former athletes, but both have limitations. Comparisons of these 2 types of concussion histories are needed to improve the accuracy of estimates of concussion history for future research and clinical care. Purpose: To estimate the agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories during college and to explore reasons for differences. Study: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Athlete-recalled concussion histories were provided by a convenience sample of 130 former collegiate athletes using an online questionnaire, and they were individually linked to previously collected clinical data that tracked medically diagnosed concussions at the host institution from 1996 to 2012. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) was used to assess agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories. Descriptive analyses were performed to assess reasons for disagreement. Results: Agreement between athlete-recalled and clinically documented concussion histories was low (ICC2},
keywords = {adult, athlete, Athletes, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, cohort analysis, Cohort Studies, comparative study, concurrent validity, Concussion, EPIDEMIOLOGY, Female, human, Humans, injury, interpersonal communication, medical record, MEDICAL records, Mental Recall, psychology, recall, self report, sex difference, Sex Factors, traumatic brain injury, Truth Disclosure, Universities, university},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}