Baker, J G; Leddy, J J; Darling, S R; Rieger, B P; Mashtare, T L; Sharma, T; Willer, B S
Factors Associated with Problems for Adolescents Returning to the Classroom after Sport-Related Concussion Journal Article
In: Clinical Pediatrics, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 961–968, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Absenteeism, Adolescent, adolescent disease, adult, Article, athlete, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, computer testing, Concussion, disease association, disease severity, Female, follow up, Follow-Up Studies, health service, human, Humans, interview, Interviews as Topic, Logistic Models, major clinical study, Male, Pathophysiology, receiver operating characteristic, recovery time, Recurrence, recurrent disease, return to learn, ROC Curve, school, school problems, sport injury, Sport-related concussion, statistical model, Symptoms, telephone interview, Young Adult
@article{Baker2015,
title = {Factors Associated with Problems for Adolescents Returning to the Classroom after Sport-Related Concussion},
author = {Baker, J G and Leddy, J J and Darling, S R and Rieger, B P and Mashtare, T L and Sharma, T and Willer, B S},
doi = {10.1177/0009922815588820},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Clinical Pediatrics},
volume = {54},
number = {10},
pages = {961--968},
abstract = {The primary objective of this study was to determine factors in the clinic setting associated with concussion-related problems in the school setting. A total of 91 student athletes, 13 to 19 years old, completed the SCAT2 and computerized testing during their initial visit to the clinic. During a follow-up telephone interview, one-third reported problems with return to school. The presence of problems reported in school was associated with severity of concussion as represented by recovery time and the overall number of symptoms at the first clinic visit. Gender, age, and previous concussions were not associated with school problems. Athletes with computerized test scores below the ninth percentile were more likely to report school problems. The current study offers some descriptive information for clinicians and ideas for future research related to adolescent athletes with concussion and problems with return to the classroom. © SAGE Publications.},
keywords = {Absenteeism, Adolescent, adolescent disease, adult, Article, athlete, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, computer testing, Concussion, disease association, disease severity, Female, follow up, Follow-Up Studies, health service, human, Humans, interview, Interviews as Topic, Logistic Models, major clinical study, Male, Pathophysiology, receiver operating characteristic, recovery time, Recurrence, recurrent disease, return to learn, ROC Curve, school, school problems, sport injury, Sport-related concussion, statistical model, Symptoms, telephone interview, Young Adult},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Hinton-Bayre, A D
Normative Versus Baseline Paradigms for Detecting Neuropsychological Impairment Following Sports-Related Concussion Journal Article
In: Brain Impairment, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 80–89, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, Article, athlete, Australian, Concussion, controlled study, data processing, diagnostic test accuracy study, disease association, disease classification, human, major clinical study, Male, medical assessment, mild traumatic brain injury, neurocognitive, neuropsychological test, Patient Assessment, psychopathy, receiver operating characteristic, reference value, reliability, reliable change, rugby, scoring system, sensitivity analysis, Sensitivity and Specificity, sport injury
@article{Hinton-Bayre2015,
title = {Normative Versus Baseline Paradigms for Detecting Neuropsychological Impairment Following Sports-Related Concussion},
author = {Hinton-Bayre, A D},
doi = {10.1017/BrImp.2015.14},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Brain Impairment},
volume = {16},
number = {2},
pages = {80--89},
abstract = {Objective: Obtaining baseline neuropsychological (NP) data to assist management of sports-related concussion has been considered the standard of care. The validity of this approach has been questioned, with suggestions that post-concussion testing alone will suffice. The present study compared the sensitivity of baseline and normative paradigms in the setting of sports-related concussion. Method: Baseline NP data were collected for 194 Australian rugby league athletes on a brief battery of paper-and-pencil NP tests. During competition, 27 athletes sustaining concussion referred from a sports physician were retested within two days of injury. Twenty-six uninjured controls were assessed at similar intervals. The baseline paradigm was assessed using a reliable change index for pre- and post-concussion scores. The normative paradigm was assessed comparing the post-concussion score to a normative mean. Results: The baseline paradigm was consistently more sensitive to negative change following concussion than the normative paradigm when using continuous data, despite reasonable agreement. However, when data were categorised as 'impaired' or 'not-impaired', using either 68% or 90% confidence intervals, the difference between paradigms failed to reach significance. Comparison of ROC curves for both paradigms found superior overall classification for one test and the composite score using baseline comparison data. Conclusions: Despite being a time and resource intensive process, the baseline paradigm as a repeated-measures design may be more sensitive than the between-subjects design of the normative paradigm for detecting changes following concussion. Further work is required to determine the validity of normative assessment in sports-related concussion. Copyright © Australasian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment 2015.},
keywords = {adult, Article, athlete, Australian, Concussion, controlled study, data processing, diagnostic test accuracy study, disease association, disease classification, human, major clinical study, Male, medical assessment, mild traumatic brain injury, neurocognitive, neuropsychological test, Patient Assessment, psychopathy, receiver operating characteristic, reference value, reliability, reliable change, rugby, scoring system, sensitivity analysis, Sensitivity and Specificity, sport injury},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Stone Jr., M E; Safadjou, S; Farber, B; Velazco, N; Man, J; Reddy, S H; Todor, R; Teperman, S
Utility of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in a civilian trauma population Journal Article
In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 147–151, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Adolescent, adult, aged, Alcoholic Intoxication, amnesia, Article, assessment of humans, brain concussion, Brain Injuries, clinical assessment tool, computer assisted tomography, Concussion screening, Confounding Factors (Epidemiology), controlled study, DATA analysis, Demography, diagnostic test accuracy study, Dizziness, emergency health service, Female, Head, headache, hospital admission, human, Humans, injury severity, irritability, major clinical study, Male, middle aged, mild traumatic brain injury, Military Acute Concussion Evaluation, military medicine, nausea and vomiting, predictive value, priority journal, quality control, receiver operating characteristic, ROC Curve, screening test, Sensitivity and Specificity, traumatic brain injury, unconsciousness, Urban Population, visual disorder, Young Adult
@article{StoneJr.2015,
title = {Utility of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in a civilian trauma population},
author = {{Stone Jr.}, M E and Safadjou, S and Farber, B and Velazco, N and Man, J and Reddy, S H and Todor, R and Teperman, S},
doi = {10.1097/TA.0000000000000679},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery},
volume = {79},
number = {1},
pages = {147--151},
abstract = {BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) constitutes 75% of more than 1.5 million traumatic brain injuries annually. There exists no consensus on point-of-care screening for mTBI. The Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) is a quick and easy test used by the US Army to screen for mTBI; however, its utility in civilian trauma is unclear. It has two parts: a history section and the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) score (0-30) previously validated in sports injury. As a performance improvement project, our institution sought to evaluate the MACE as a concussion screening tool that could be used by housestaff in a general civilian trauma population. METHODS: From June 2013 to May 2014, patients 18 years to 65 years old with suspected concussion were given the MACE within 72 hours of admission to our urban Level I trauma center. Patients with a positive head computed tomography were excluded. Demographic data and MACE scores were recorded in prospect. Concussion was defined as loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia; concussed patients were compared with those nonconcussed. Sensitivity and specificity for each respective MACE score were used to plot a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. An ROC curve area of 0.8 was set as the benchmark for a good screening test to distinguish concussion from nonconcussion. RESULTS: There were 84 concussions and 30 nonconcussed patients. Both groups were similar; however, the concussion group had a lower mean MACE score than the nonconcussed patients. Data analysis demonstrated the sensitivity and specificity of a range of MACE scores used to generate an ROC curve area of only 0.65. CONCLUSION: The MACE showed a lower mean score for individuals with concussion, defined by loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia. However, the ROC curve area of 0.65 highly suggests that MACE alone would be a poor screening test for mTBI in a general civilian trauma population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level II. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {Adolescent, adult, aged, Alcoholic Intoxication, amnesia, Article, assessment of humans, brain concussion, Brain Injuries, clinical assessment tool, computer assisted tomography, Concussion screening, Confounding Factors (Epidemiology), controlled study, DATA analysis, Demography, diagnostic test accuracy study, Dizziness, emergency health service, Female, Head, headache, hospital admission, human, Humans, injury severity, irritability, major clinical study, Male, middle aged, mild traumatic brain injury, Military Acute Concussion Evaluation, military medicine, nausea and vomiting, predictive value, priority journal, quality control, receiver operating characteristic, ROC Curve, screening test, Sensitivity and Specificity, traumatic brain injury, unconsciousness, Urban Population, visual disorder, Young Adult},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Baker, J G; Leddy, J J; Darling, S R; Rieger, B P; Mashtare, T L; Sharma, T; Willer, B S
Factors Associated with Problems for Adolescents Returning to the Classroom after Sport-Related Concussion Journal Article
In: Clinical Pediatrics, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 961–968, 2015.
@article{Baker2015,
title = {Factors Associated with Problems for Adolescents Returning to the Classroom after Sport-Related Concussion},
author = {Baker, J G and Leddy, J J and Darling, S R and Rieger, B P and Mashtare, T L and Sharma, T and Willer, B S},
doi = {10.1177/0009922815588820},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Clinical Pediatrics},
volume = {54},
number = {10},
pages = {961--968},
abstract = {The primary objective of this study was to determine factors in the clinic setting associated with concussion-related problems in the school setting. A total of 91 student athletes, 13 to 19 years old, completed the SCAT2 and computerized testing during their initial visit to the clinic. During a follow-up telephone interview, one-third reported problems with return to school. The presence of problems reported in school was associated with severity of concussion as represented by recovery time and the overall number of symptoms at the first clinic visit. Gender, age, and previous concussions were not associated with school problems. Athletes with computerized test scores below the ninth percentile were more likely to report school problems. The current study offers some descriptive information for clinicians and ideas for future research related to adolescent athletes with concussion and problems with return to the classroom. © SAGE Publications.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Hinton-Bayre, A D
Normative Versus Baseline Paradigms for Detecting Neuropsychological Impairment Following Sports-Related Concussion Journal Article
In: Brain Impairment, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 80–89, 2015.
@article{Hinton-Bayre2015,
title = {Normative Versus Baseline Paradigms for Detecting Neuropsychological Impairment Following Sports-Related Concussion},
author = {Hinton-Bayre, A D},
doi = {10.1017/BrImp.2015.14},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Brain Impairment},
volume = {16},
number = {2},
pages = {80--89},
abstract = {Objective: Obtaining baseline neuropsychological (NP) data to assist management of sports-related concussion has been considered the standard of care. The validity of this approach has been questioned, with suggestions that post-concussion testing alone will suffice. The present study compared the sensitivity of baseline and normative paradigms in the setting of sports-related concussion. Method: Baseline NP data were collected for 194 Australian rugby league athletes on a brief battery of paper-and-pencil NP tests. During competition, 27 athletes sustaining concussion referred from a sports physician were retested within two days of injury. Twenty-six uninjured controls were assessed at similar intervals. The baseline paradigm was assessed using a reliable change index for pre- and post-concussion scores. The normative paradigm was assessed comparing the post-concussion score to a normative mean. Results: The baseline paradigm was consistently more sensitive to negative change following concussion than the normative paradigm when using continuous data, despite reasonable agreement. However, when data were categorised as 'impaired' or 'not-impaired', using either 68% or 90% confidence intervals, the difference between paradigms failed to reach significance. Comparison of ROC curves for both paradigms found superior overall classification for one test and the composite score using baseline comparison data. Conclusions: Despite being a time and resource intensive process, the baseline paradigm as a repeated-measures design may be more sensitive than the between-subjects design of the normative paradigm for detecting changes following concussion. Further work is required to determine the validity of normative assessment in sports-related concussion. Copyright © Australasian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment 2015.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Stone Jr., M E; Safadjou, S; Farber, B; Velazco, N; Man, J; Reddy, S H; Todor, R; Teperman, S
Utility of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in a civilian trauma population Journal Article
In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 147–151, 2015.
@article{StoneJr.2015,
title = {Utility of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in a civilian trauma population},
author = {{Stone Jr.}, M E and Safadjou, S and Farber, B and Velazco, N and Man, J and Reddy, S H and Todor, R and Teperman, S},
doi = {10.1097/TA.0000000000000679},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery},
volume = {79},
number = {1},
pages = {147--151},
abstract = {BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) constitutes 75% of more than 1.5 million traumatic brain injuries annually. There exists no consensus on point-of-care screening for mTBI. The Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) is a quick and easy test used by the US Army to screen for mTBI; however, its utility in civilian trauma is unclear. It has two parts: a history section and the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) score (0-30) previously validated in sports injury. As a performance improvement project, our institution sought to evaluate the MACE as a concussion screening tool that could be used by housestaff in a general civilian trauma population. METHODS: From June 2013 to May 2014, patients 18 years to 65 years old with suspected concussion were given the MACE within 72 hours of admission to our urban Level I trauma center. Patients with a positive head computed tomography were excluded. Demographic data and MACE scores were recorded in prospect. Concussion was defined as loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia; concussed patients were compared with those nonconcussed. Sensitivity and specificity for each respective MACE score were used to plot a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. An ROC curve area of 0.8 was set as the benchmark for a good screening test to distinguish concussion from nonconcussion. RESULTS: There were 84 concussions and 30 nonconcussed patients. Both groups were similar; however, the concussion group had a lower mean MACE score than the nonconcussed patients. Data analysis demonstrated the sensitivity and specificity of a range of MACE scores used to generate an ROC curve area of only 0.65. CONCLUSION: The MACE showed a lower mean score for individuals with concussion, defined by loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia. However, the ROC curve area of 0.65 highly suggests that MACE alone would be a poor screening test for mTBI in a general civilian trauma population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level II. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Baker, J G; Leddy, J J; Darling, S R; Rieger, B P; Mashtare, T L; Sharma, T; Willer, B S
Factors Associated with Problems for Adolescents Returning to the Classroom after Sport-Related Concussion Journal Article
In: Clinical Pediatrics, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 961–968, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Absenteeism, Adolescent, adolescent disease, adult, Article, athlete, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, computer testing, Concussion, disease association, disease severity, Female, follow up, Follow-Up Studies, health service, human, Humans, interview, Interviews as Topic, Logistic Models, major clinical study, Male, Pathophysiology, receiver operating characteristic, recovery time, Recurrence, recurrent disease, return to learn, ROC Curve, school, school problems, sport injury, Sport-related concussion, statistical model, Symptoms, telephone interview, Young Adult
@article{Baker2015,
title = {Factors Associated with Problems for Adolescents Returning to the Classroom after Sport-Related Concussion},
author = {Baker, J G and Leddy, J J and Darling, S R and Rieger, B P and Mashtare, T L and Sharma, T and Willer, B S},
doi = {10.1177/0009922815588820},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Clinical Pediatrics},
volume = {54},
number = {10},
pages = {961--968},
abstract = {The primary objective of this study was to determine factors in the clinic setting associated with concussion-related problems in the school setting. A total of 91 student athletes, 13 to 19 years old, completed the SCAT2 and computerized testing during their initial visit to the clinic. During a follow-up telephone interview, one-third reported problems with return to school. The presence of problems reported in school was associated with severity of concussion as represented by recovery time and the overall number of symptoms at the first clinic visit. Gender, age, and previous concussions were not associated with school problems. Athletes with computerized test scores below the ninth percentile were more likely to report school problems. The current study offers some descriptive information for clinicians and ideas for future research related to adolescent athletes with concussion and problems with return to the classroom. © SAGE Publications.},
keywords = {Absenteeism, Adolescent, adolescent disease, adult, Article, athlete, Athletic Injuries, brain concussion, computer testing, Concussion, disease association, disease severity, Female, follow up, Follow-Up Studies, health service, human, Humans, interview, Interviews as Topic, Logistic Models, major clinical study, Male, Pathophysiology, receiver operating characteristic, recovery time, Recurrence, recurrent disease, return to learn, ROC Curve, school, school problems, sport injury, Sport-related concussion, statistical model, Symptoms, telephone interview, Young Adult},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Hinton-Bayre, A D
Normative Versus Baseline Paradigms for Detecting Neuropsychological Impairment Following Sports-Related Concussion Journal Article
In: Brain Impairment, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 80–89, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, Article, athlete, Australian, Concussion, controlled study, data processing, diagnostic test accuracy study, disease association, disease classification, human, major clinical study, Male, medical assessment, mild traumatic brain injury, neurocognitive, neuropsychological test, Patient Assessment, psychopathy, receiver operating characteristic, reference value, reliability, reliable change, rugby, scoring system, sensitivity analysis, Sensitivity and Specificity, sport injury
@article{Hinton-Bayre2015,
title = {Normative Versus Baseline Paradigms for Detecting Neuropsychological Impairment Following Sports-Related Concussion},
author = {Hinton-Bayre, A D},
doi = {10.1017/BrImp.2015.14},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Brain Impairment},
volume = {16},
number = {2},
pages = {80--89},
abstract = {Objective: Obtaining baseline neuropsychological (NP) data to assist management of sports-related concussion has been considered the standard of care. The validity of this approach has been questioned, with suggestions that post-concussion testing alone will suffice. The present study compared the sensitivity of baseline and normative paradigms in the setting of sports-related concussion. Method: Baseline NP data were collected for 194 Australian rugby league athletes on a brief battery of paper-and-pencil NP tests. During competition, 27 athletes sustaining concussion referred from a sports physician were retested within two days of injury. Twenty-six uninjured controls were assessed at similar intervals. The baseline paradigm was assessed using a reliable change index for pre- and post-concussion scores. The normative paradigm was assessed comparing the post-concussion score to a normative mean. Results: The baseline paradigm was consistently more sensitive to negative change following concussion than the normative paradigm when using continuous data, despite reasonable agreement. However, when data were categorised as 'impaired' or 'not-impaired', using either 68% or 90% confidence intervals, the difference between paradigms failed to reach significance. Comparison of ROC curves for both paradigms found superior overall classification for one test and the composite score using baseline comparison data. Conclusions: Despite being a time and resource intensive process, the baseline paradigm as a repeated-measures design may be more sensitive than the between-subjects design of the normative paradigm for detecting changes following concussion. Further work is required to determine the validity of normative assessment in sports-related concussion. Copyright © Australasian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment 2015.},
keywords = {adult, Article, athlete, Australian, Concussion, controlled study, data processing, diagnostic test accuracy study, disease association, disease classification, human, major clinical study, Male, medical assessment, mild traumatic brain injury, neurocognitive, neuropsychological test, Patient Assessment, psychopathy, receiver operating characteristic, reference value, reliability, reliable change, rugby, scoring system, sensitivity analysis, Sensitivity and Specificity, sport injury},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Stone Jr., M E; Safadjou, S; Farber, B; Velazco, N; Man, J; Reddy, S H; Todor, R; Teperman, S
Utility of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in a civilian trauma population Journal Article
In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 147–151, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Adolescent, adult, aged, Alcoholic Intoxication, amnesia, Article, assessment of humans, brain concussion, Brain Injuries, clinical assessment tool, computer assisted tomography, Concussion screening, Confounding Factors (Epidemiology), controlled study, DATA analysis, Demography, diagnostic test accuracy study, Dizziness, emergency health service, Female, Head, headache, hospital admission, human, Humans, injury severity, irritability, major clinical study, Male, middle aged, mild traumatic brain injury, Military Acute Concussion Evaluation, military medicine, nausea and vomiting, predictive value, priority journal, quality control, receiver operating characteristic, ROC Curve, screening test, Sensitivity and Specificity, traumatic brain injury, unconsciousness, Urban Population, visual disorder, Young Adult
@article{StoneJr.2015,
title = {Utility of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in a civilian trauma population},
author = {{Stone Jr.}, M E and Safadjou, S and Farber, B and Velazco, N and Man, J and Reddy, S H and Todor, R and Teperman, S},
doi = {10.1097/TA.0000000000000679},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery},
volume = {79},
number = {1},
pages = {147--151},
abstract = {BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) constitutes 75% of more than 1.5 million traumatic brain injuries annually. There exists no consensus on point-of-care screening for mTBI. The Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) is a quick and easy test used by the US Army to screen for mTBI; however, its utility in civilian trauma is unclear. It has two parts: a history section and the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) score (0-30) previously validated in sports injury. As a performance improvement project, our institution sought to evaluate the MACE as a concussion screening tool that could be used by housestaff in a general civilian trauma population. METHODS: From June 2013 to May 2014, patients 18 years to 65 years old with suspected concussion were given the MACE within 72 hours of admission to our urban Level I trauma center. Patients with a positive head computed tomography were excluded. Demographic data and MACE scores were recorded in prospect. Concussion was defined as loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia; concussed patients were compared with those nonconcussed. Sensitivity and specificity for each respective MACE score were used to plot a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. An ROC curve area of 0.8 was set as the benchmark for a good screening test to distinguish concussion from nonconcussion. RESULTS: There were 84 concussions and 30 nonconcussed patients. Both groups were similar; however, the concussion group had a lower mean MACE score than the nonconcussed patients. Data analysis demonstrated the sensitivity and specificity of a range of MACE scores used to generate an ROC curve area of only 0.65. CONCLUSION: The MACE showed a lower mean score for individuals with concussion, defined by loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia. However, the ROC curve area of 0.65 highly suggests that MACE alone would be a poor screening test for mTBI in a general civilian trauma population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level II. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {Adolescent, adult, aged, Alcoholic Intoxication, amnesia, Article, assessment of humans, brain concussion, Brain Injuries, clinical assessment tool, computer assisted tomography, Concussion screening, Confounding Factors (Epidemiology), controlled study, DATA analysis, Demography, diagnostic test accuracy study, Dizziness, emergency health service, Female, Head, headache, hospital admission, human, Humans, injury severity, irritability, major clinical study, Male, middle aged, mild traumatic brain injury, Military Acute Concussion Evaluation, military medicine, nausea and vomiting, predictive value, priority journal, quality control, receiver operating characteristic, ROC Curve, screening test, Sensitivity and Specificity, traumatic brain injury, unconsciousness, Urban Population, visual disorder, Young Adult},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}