References

2015

Billock, R M; Anderegg, J J; Mehan, T J; Chounthirath, T; Smith, G A

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1745–1749, 2015.

Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Accidental Falls, Adolescent, adult, arm fracture, Article, body regions, Child, Concussion, emergency health service, Emergency Service, emergency ward, EPIDEMIOLOGY, falling, Female, head and neck injury, head injury, Hospital, hospitalization, human, Humans, Infant, leg injury, major clinical study, Male, Newborn, Preschool, preschool child, priority journal, recreation, residential area, SAFETY, soft tissue injury, sport injury, sprain, statistics and numerical data, trunk injury, UNITED States, Wounds and Injuries, Young Adult, zipline related injury

@article{Billock2015,

title = {Zipline-related injuries treated in US EDs, 1997-2012},

author = {Billock, R M and Anderegg, J J and Mehan, T J and Chounthirath, T and Smith, G A},

doi = {10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.022},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-01-01},

journal = {American Journal of Emergency Medicine},

volume = {33},

number = {12},

pages = {1745--1749},

abstract = {Purpose To investigate the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries in the United States. Basic Procedures The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was used to examine non-fatal zipline-related injuries treated in US emergency departments (EDs) from 1997 through 2012. Sample weights were applied to calculate national estimates. Main Findings From 1997 through 2012, an estimated 16 850 (95% CI, 13 188-20 512) zipline-related injuries were treated in US EDs. The annual injury rate per 1 million population increased by 52.3% from 7.64 (95% CI, 4.86-10.42) injuries in 2009 (the first year with a stable annual estimate) to 11.64 (95% CI, 7.83-15.45) injuries in 2012. Patients aged 0-9 years accounted for 45.0% of injuries, females made up 53.1% of injuries, and 11.7% of patients required hospitalization. Fractures accounted for the largest proportion of injuries (46.7%), and the upper extremities were the most commonly injured body region (44.1%). Falls were the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for 77.3% of injuries. Among cases where the location of the injury event was known, 30.8% of injuries occurred in a residential setting and 69.2% occurred in a public place. Principal Conclusions This study is the first to characterize the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries using a nationally representative database. The rapid increase in zipline-related injuries in recent years suggests the need for additional safety guidelines and regulations. Commercial ziplines and publicly accessible non-commercial ziplines should be subject to uniform safety standards in all states and jurisdictions across the US, and homemade ziplines should not be used. © 2015 Elsevier Inc.},

keywords = {Accidental Falls, Adolescent, adult, arm fracture, Article, body regions, Child, Concussion, emergency health service, Emergency Service, emergency ward, EPIDEMIOLOGY, falling, Female, head and neck injury, head injury, Hospital, hospitalization, human, Humans, Infant, leg injury, major clinical study, Male, Newborn, Preschool, preschool child, priority journal, recreation, residential area, SAFETY, soft tissue injury, sport injury, sprain, statistics and numerical data, trunk injury, UNITED States, Wounds and Injuries, Young Adult, zipline related injury},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

Stone Jr., M E; Safadjou, S; Farber, B; Velazco, N; Man, J; Reddy, S H; Todor, R; Teperman, S

Utility of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in a civilian trauma population Journal Article

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 147–151, 2015.

Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Adolescent, adult, aged, Alcoholic Intoxication, amnesia, Article, assessment of humans, brain concussion, Brain Injuries, clinical assessment tool, computer assisted tomography, Concussion screening, Confounding Factors (Epidemiology), controlled study, DATA analysis, Demography, diagnostic test accuracy study, Dizziness, emergency health service, Female, Head, headache, hospital admission, human, Humans, injury severity, irritability, major clinical study, Male, middle aged, mild traumatic brain injury, Military Acute Concussion Evaluation, military medicine, nausea and vomiting, predictive value, priority journal, quality control, receiver operating characteristic, ROC Curve, screening test, Sensitivity and Specificity, traumatic brain injury, unconsciousness, Urban Population, visual disorder, Young Adult

@article{StoneJr.2015,

title = {Utility of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in a civilian trauma population},

author = {{Stone Jr.}, M E and Safadjou, S and Farber, B and Velazco, N and Man, J and Reddy, S H and Todor, R and Teperman, S},

doi = {10.1097/TA.0000000000000679},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-01-01},

journal = {Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery},

volume = {79},

number = {1},

pages = {147--151},

abstract = {BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) constitutes 75% of more than 1.5 million traumatic brain injuries annually. There exists no consensus on point-of-care screening for mTBI. The Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) is a quick and easy test used by the US Army to screen for mTBI; however, its utility in civilian trauma is unclear. It has two parts: a history section and the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) score (0-30) previously validated in sports injury. As a performance improvement project, our institution sought to evaluate the MACE as a concussion screening tool that could be used by housestaff in a general civilian trauma population. METHODS: From June 2013 to May 2014, patients 18 years to 65 years old with suspected concussion were given the MACE within 72 hours of admission to our urban Level I trauma center. Patients with a positive head computed tomography were excluded. Demographic data and MACE scores were recorded in prospect. Concussion was defined as loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia; concussed patients were compared with those nonconcussed. Sensitivity and specificity for each respective MACE score were used to plot a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. An ROC curve area of 0.8 was set as the benchmark for a good screening test to distinguish concussion from nonconcussion. RESULTS: There were 84 concussions and 30 nonconcussed patients. Both groups were similar; however, the concussion group had a lower mean MACE score than the nonconcussed patients. Data analysis demonstrated the sensitivity and specificity of a range of MACE scores used to generate an ROC curve area of only 0.65. CONCLUSION: The MACE showed a lower mean score for individuals with concussion, defined by loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia. However, the ROC curve area of 0.65 highly suggests that MACE alone would be a poor screening test for mTBI in a general civilian trauma population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level II. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.},

keywords = {Adolescent, adult, aged, Alcoholic Intoxication, amnesia, Article, assessment of humans, brain concussion, Brain Injuries, clinical assessment tool, computer assisted tomography, Concussion screening, Confounding Factors (Epidemiology), controlled study, DATA analysis, Demography, diagnostic test accuracy study, Dizziness, emergency health service, Female, Head, headache, hospital admission, human, Humans, injury severity, irritability, major clinical study, Male, middle aged, mild traumatic brain injury, Military Acute Concussion Evaluation, military medicine, nausea and vomiting, predictive value, priority journal, quality control, receiver operating characteristic, ROC Curve, screening test, Sensitivity and Specificity, traumatic brain injury, unconsciousness, Urban Population, visual disorder, Young Adult},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) constitutes 75% of more than 1.5 million traumatic brain injuries annually. There exists no consensus on point-of-care screening for mTBI. The Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) is a quick and easy test used by the US Army to screen for mTBI; however, its utility in civilian trauma is unclear. It has two parts: a history section and the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) score (0-30) previously validated in sports injury. As a performance improvement project, our institution sought to evaluate the MACE as a concussion screening tool that could be used by housestaff in a general civilian trauma population. METHODS: From June 2013 to May 2014, patients 18 years to 65 years old with suspected concussion were given the MACE within 72 hours of admission to our urban Level I trauma center. Patients with a positive head computed tomography were excluded. Demographic data and MACE scores were recorded in prospect. Concussion was defined as loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia; concussed patients were compared with those nonconcussed. Sensitivity and specificity for each respective MACE score were used to plot a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. An ROC curve area of 0.8 was set as the benchmark for a good screening test to distinguish concussion from nonconcussion. RESULTS: There were 84 concussions and 30 nonconcussed patients. Both groups were similar; however, the concussion group had a lower mean MACE score than the nonconcussed patients. Data analysis demonstrated the sensitivity and specificity of a range of MACE scores used to generate an ROC curve area of only 0.65. CONCLUSION: The MACE showed a lower mean score for individuals with concussion, defined by loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia. However, the ROC curve area of 0.65 highly suggests that MACE alone would be a poor screening test for mTBI in a general civilian trauma population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level II. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Liu, C Y; Law, M; Romano, R

Rational approach to understanding and preventing sports-related traumatic brain injuries Journal Article

In: World Neurosurgery, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1556–1557, 2015.

Links | BibTeX | Tags: accelerometer, ACCELEROMETRY, biological marker, brain, brain concussion, brain hemorrhage, cognitive defect, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Electroencephalography, emergency health service, Female, Head Protective Devices, Helmet, high risk patient, human, Humans, Injuries, Male, neuroimaging, neuromodulation, neuroprotective agent, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, Occupational Exposure, protective equipment, Review, risk factor, risk reduction, SAFETY, skiing, Snowboarding, sport injury, Traumatic, traumatic brain injury, viscoelastic substance

Reference Search

Billock, R M; Anderegg, J J; Mehan, T J; Chounthirath, T; Smith, G A

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1745–1749, 2015.

Abstract | Links | BibTeX

@article{Billock2015,

title = {Zipline-related injuries treated in US EDs, 1997-2012},

author = {Billock, R M and Anderegg, J J and Mehan, T J and Chounthirath, T and Smith, G A},

doi = {10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.022},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-01-01},

journal = {American Journal of Emergency Medicine},

volume = {33},

number = {12},

pages = {1745--1749},

abstract = {Purpose To investigate the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries in the United States. Basic Procedures The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was used to examine non-fatal zipline-related injuries treated in US emergency departments (EDs) from 1997 through 2012. Sample weights were applied to calculate national estimates. Main Findings From 1997 through 2012, an estimated 16 850 (95% CI, 13 188-20 512) zipline-related injuries were treated in US EDs. The annual injury rate per 1 million population increased by 52.3% from 7.64 (95% CI, 4.86-10.42) injuries in 2009 (the first year with a stable annual estimate) to 11.64 (95% CI, 7.83-15.45) injuries in 2012. Patients aged 0-9 years accounted for 45.0% of injuries, females made up 53.1% of injuries, and 11.7% of patients required hospitalization. Fractures accounted for the largest proportion of injuries (46.7%), and the upper extremities were the most commonly injured body region (44.1%). Falls were the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for 77.3% of injuries. Among cases where the location of the injury event was known, 30.8% of injuries occurred in a residential setting and 69.2% occurred in a public place. Principal Conclusions This study is the first to characterize the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries using a nationally representative database. The rapid increase in zipline-related injuries in recent years suggests the need for additional safety guidelines and regulations. Commercial ziplines and publicly accessible non-commercial ziplines should be subject to uniform safety standards in all states and jurisdictions across the US, and homemade ziplines should not be used. © 2015 Elsevier Inc.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

Stone Jr., M E; Safadjou, S; Farber, B; Velazco, N; Man, J; Reddy, S H; Todor, R; Teperman, S

Utility of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in a civilian trauma population Journal Article

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 147–151, 2015.

Abstract | Links | BibTeX

@article{StoneJr.2015,

title = {Utility of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in a civilian trauma population},

author = {{Stone Jr.}, M E and Safadjou, S and Farber, B and Velazco, N and Man, J and Reddy, S H and Todor, R and Teperman, S},

doi = {10.1097/TA.0000000000000679},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-01-01},

journal = {Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery},

volume = {79},

number = {1},

pages = {147--151},

abstract = {BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) constitutes 75% of more than 1.5 million traumatic brain injuries annually. There exists no consensus on point-of-care screening for mTBI. The Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) is a quick and easy test used by the US Army to screen for mTBI; however, its utility in civilian trauma is unclear. It has two parts: a history section and the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) score (0-30) previously validated in sports injury. As a performance improvement project, our institution sought to evaluate the MACE as a concussion screening tool that could be used by housestaff in a general civilian trauma population. METHODS: From June 2013 to May 2014, patients 18 years to 65 years old with suspected concussion were given the MACE within 72 hours of admission to our urban Level I trauma center. Patients with a positive head computed tomography were excluded. Demographic data and MACE scores were recorded in prospect. Concussion was defined as loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia; concussed patients were compared with those nonconcussed. Sensitivity and specificity for each respective MACE score were used to plot a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. An ROC curve area of 0.8 was set as the benchmark for a good screening test to distinguish concussion from nonconcussion. RESULTS: There were 84 concussions and 30 nonconcussed patients. Both groups were similar; however, the concussion group had a lower mean MACE score than the nonconcussed patients. Data analysis demonstrated the sensitivity and specificity of a range of MACE scores used to generate an ROC curve area of only 0.65. CONCLUSION: The MACE showed a lower mean score for individuals with concussion, defined by loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia. However, the ROC curve area of 0.65 highly suggests that MACE alone would be a poor screening test for mTBI in a general civilian trauma population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level II. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

Liu, C Y; Law, M; Romano, R

Rational approach to understanding and preventing sports-related traumatic brain injuries Journal Article

In: World Neurosurgery, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1556–1557, 2015.

Links | BibTeX

Most Referenced Keywords

Show all

2015

Billock, R M; Anderegg, J J; Mehan, T J; Chounthirath, T; Smith, G A

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 1745–1749, 2015.

@article{Billock2015,

title = {Zipline-related injuries treated in US EDs, 1997-2012},

author = {Billock, R M and Anderegg, J J and Mehan, T J and Chounthirath, T and Smith, G A},

doi = {10.1016/j.ajem.2015.08.022},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-01-01},

journal = {American Journal of Emergency Medicine},

volume = {33},

number = {12},

pages = {1745--1749},

abstract = {Purpose To investigate the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries in the United States. Basic Procedures The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database was used to examine non-fatal zipline-related injuries treated in US emergency departments (EDs) from 1997 through 2012. Sample weights were applied to calculate national estimates. Main Findings From 1997 through 2012, an estimated 16 850 (95% CI, 13 188-20 512) zipline-related injuries were treated in US EDs. The annual injury rate per 1 million population increased by 52.3% from 7.64 (95% CI, 4.86-10.42) injuries in 2009 (the first year with a stable annual estimate) to 11.64 (95% CI, 7.83-15.45) injuries in 2012. Patients aged 0-9 years accounted for 45.0% of injuries, females made up 53.1% of injuries, and 11.7% of patients required hospitalization. Fractures accounted for the largest proportion of injuries (46.7%), and the upper extremities were the most commonly injured body region (44.1%). Falls were the most common mechanism of injury, accounting for 77.3% of injuries. Among cases where the location of the injury event was known, 30.8% of injuries occurred in a residential setting and 69.2% occurred in a public place. Principal Conclusions This study is the first to characterize the epidemiology of zipline-related injuries using a nationally representative database. The rapid increase in zipline-related injuries in recent years suggests the need for additional safety guidelines and regulations. Commercial ziplines and publicly accessible non-commercial ziplines should be subject to uniform safety standards in all states and jurisdictions across the US, and homemade ziplines should not be used. © 2015 Elsevier Inc.},

keywords = {Accidental Falls, Adolescent, adult, arm fracture, Article, body regions, Child, Concussion, emergency health service, Emergency Service, emergency ward, EPIDEMIOLOGY, falling, Female, head and neck injury, head injury, Hospital, hospitalization, human, Humans, Infant, leg injury, major clinical study, Male, Newborn, Preschool, preschool child, priority journal, recreation, residential area, SAFETY, soft tissue injury, sport injury, sprain, statistics and numerical data, trunk injury, UNITED States, Wounds and Injuries, Young Adult, zipline related injury},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

Stone Jr., M E; Safadjou, S; Farber, B; Velazco, N; Man, J; Reddy, S H; Todor, R; Teperman, S

Utility of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in a civilian trauma population Journal Article

In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 147–151, 2015.

@article{StoneJr.2015,

title = {Utility of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in a civilian trauma population},

author = {{Stone Jr.}, M E and Safadjou, S and Farber, B and Velazco, N and Man, J and Reddy, S H and Todor, R and Teperman, S},

doi = {10.1097/TA.0000000000000679},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-01-01},

journal = {Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery},

volume = {79},

number = {1},

pages = {147--151},

abstract = {BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) constitutes 75% of more than 1.5 million traumatic brain injuries annually. There exists no consensus on point-of-care screening for mTBI. The Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) is a quick and easy test used by the US Army to screen for mTBI; however, its utility in civilian trauma is unclear. It has two parts: a history section and the Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC) score (0-30) previously validated in sports injury. As a performance improvement project, our institution sought to evaluate the MACE as a concussion screening tool that could be used by housestaff in a general civilian trauma population. METHODS: From June 2013 to May 2014, patients 18 years to 65 years old with suspected concussion were given the MACE within 72 hours of admission to our urban Level I trauma center. Patients with a positive head computed tomography were excluded. Demographic data and MACE scores were recorded in prospect. Concussion was defined as loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia; concussed patients were compared with those nonconcussed. Sensitivity and specificity for each respective MACE score were used to plot a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. An ROC curve area of 0.8 was set as the benchmark for a good screening test to distinguish concussion from nonconcussion. RESULTS: There were 84 concussions and 30 nonconcussed patients. Both groups were similar; however, the concussion group had a lower mean MACE score than the nonconcussed patients. Data analysis demonstrated the sensitivity and specificity of a range of MACE scores used to generate an ROC curve area of only 0.65. CONCLUSION: The MACE showed a lower mean score for individuals with concussion, defined by loss of consciousness and/or posttraumatic amnesia. However, the ROC curve area of 0.65 highly suggests that MACE alone would be a poor screening test for mTBI in a general civilian trauma population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level II. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.},

keywords = {Adolescent, adult, aged, Alcoholic Intoxication, amnesia, Article, assessment of humans, brain concussion, Brain Injuries, clinical assessment tool, computer assisted tomography, Concussion screening, Confounding Factors (Epidemiology), controlled study, DATA analysis, Demography, diagnostic test accuracy study, Dizziness, emergency health service, Female, Head, headache, hospital admission, human, Humans, injury severity, irritability, major clinical study, Male, middle aged, mild traumatic brain injury, Military Acute Concussion Evaluation, military medicine, nausea and vomiting, predictive value, priority journal, quality control, receiver operating characteristic, ROC Curve, screening test, Sensitivity and Specificity, traumatic brain injury, unconsciousness, Urban Population, visual disorder, Young Adult},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

Liu, C Y; Law, M; Romano, R

Rational approach to understanding and preventing sports-related traumatic brain injuries Journal Article

In: World Neurosurgery, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1556–1557, 2015.

2015

Reference Search

Most Referenced Keywords

2015

About Us

Information