Lawrence, D W; Comper, P; Hutchison, M G; Sharma, B
The role of apolipoprotein E episilon ($epsilon$)-4 allele on outcome following traumatic brain injury: A systematic review Journal Article
In: Brain Injury, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1018–1031, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: 80 and over, aged, allele, Alleles, Alzheimer disease, amyloid beta protein, APOE, apolipoprotein E, apolipoprotein E4, Article, athlete, brain concussion, Brain Injuries, clinical evaluation, cognition, cognitive defect, disease severity, Female, follow up, genetic association, genetic risk, genetics, GENOTYPE, Glasgow Outcome Scale, heterozygote, histopathology, homozygote, human, Humans, Incidence, injury severity, Male, Memory, nerve cell necrosis, neuropathology, Neuroprotection, outcome assessment, pediatrics, Prevalence, Prognosis, prognostic assessment, protein function, psychologic test, psychology, Recovery, scoring system, Systematic Review, tau protein, traumatic brain injury, treatment outcome, very elderly, Wechsler Intelligence Scale
@article{Lawrence2015,
title = {The role of apolipoprotein E episilon ($epsilon$)-4 allele on outcome following traumatic brain injury: A systematic review},
author = {Lawrence, D W and Comper, P and Hutchison, M G and Sharma, B},
doi = {10.3109/02699052.2015.1005131},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Brain Injury},
volume = {29},
number = {9},
pages = {1018--1031},
abstract = {Background: The apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) has emerged as a candidate for prognosticating traumatic brain injury (TBI) recovery, with APOE$epsilon$4 identified as a susceptibility marker for poor outcome, despite large discrepancy in its reported influence post-TBI.Methods: A systematic review was conducted, including all primary articles investigating the role of APOE$epsilon$4 on TBI outcome. A total of 65 studies were included, including 24 predominantly investigating mild (mTBI), seven moderate (modTBI) and 33 severe (sTBI); severity was not reported in one study.Results: In mTBI studies, the association between APOE$epsilon$4 and post-TBI outcome was concluded as non-contributory in 14 studies (58.3%), hazardous in nine (37.5%) and protective in one (4.2%). In sTBI studies, the role of APOE$epsilon$4 was hazardous in 21 (63.6%), non-contributory in nine (27.3%) and protective in three (9.1%). Of the seven studies investigating dementia outcomes, four observed a hazardous association with APOE$epsilon$4, while three reported no association. Six studies examined Alzheimers dementia pathology, of which three reported a hazardous influence of APOE$epsilon$4.Conclusions: The influence of APOE$epsilon$4 on neuropsychological testing, functional outcome and in paediatric populations was incongruous. This review supports the majority of research indicating APOE$epsilon$4 adversely influences recovery following TBI, particularly with respect to dementia-related outcomes and outcomes following sTBI. © 2015 Taylor \& Francis Group, LLC.},
keywords = {80 and over, aged, allele, Alleles, Alzheimer disease, amyloid beta protein, APOE, apolipoprotein E, apolipoprotein E4, Article, athlete, brain concussion, Brain Injuries, clinical evaluation, cognition, cognitive defect, disease severity, Female, follow up, genetic association, genetic risk, genetics, GENOTYPE, Glasgow Outcome Scale, heterozygote, histopathology, homozygote, human, Humans, Incidence, injury severity, Male, Memory, nerve cell necrosis, neuropathology, Neuroprotection, outcome assessment, pediatrics, Prevalence, Prognosis, prognostic assessment, protein function, psychologic test, psychology, Recovery, scoring system, Systematic Review, tau protein, traumatic brain injury, treatment outcome, very elderly, Wechsler Intelligence Scale},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Makdissi, M; Davis, G; McCrory, P
Clinical challenges in the diagnosis and assessment of sports-related concussion Journal Article
In: Neurology: Clinical Practice, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 2–5, 2015.
Links | BibTeX | Tags: athlete, biological marker, checklist, clinical assessment, clinical evaluation, clinical study, competition, Concussion, Consensus, CONVALESCENCE, cost control, DECISION making, false negative result, functional disease, gold standard, human, learning, long term care, medical assessment, medical decision making, priority journal, prospective study, reaction time, recall, retrospective study, Review, risk factor, saccadic eye movement, self report, Sensitivity and Specificity, short term memory, sport injury, symptom, test retest reliability, visual system
@article{Makdissi2015,
title = {Clinical challenges in the diagnosis and assessment of sports-related concussion},
author = {Makdissi, M and Davis, G and McCrory, P},
doi = {10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000061},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Neurology: Clinical Practice},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
pages = {2--5},
keywords = {athlete, biological marker, checklist, clinical assessment, clinical evaluation, clinical study, competition, Concussion, Consensus, CONVALESCENCE, cost control, DECISION making, false negative result, functional disease, gold standard, human, learning, long term care, medical assessment, medical decision making, priority journal, prospective study, reaction time, recall, retrospective study, Review, risk factor, saccadic eye movement, self report, Sensitivity and Specificity, short term memory, sport injury, symptom, test retest reliability, visual system},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Lawrence, D W; Comper, P; Hutchison, M G; Sharma, B
The role of apolipoprotein E episilon ($epsilon$)-4 allele on outcome following traumatic brain injury: A systematic review Journal Article
In: Brain Injury, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1018–1031, 2015.
@article{Lawrence2015,
title = {The role of apolipoprotein E episilon ($epsilon$)-4 allele on outcome following traumatic brain injury: A systematic review},
author = {Lawrence, D W and Comper, P and Hutchison, M G and Sharma, B},
doi = {10.3109/02699052.2015.1005131},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Brain Injury},
volume = {29},
number = {9},
pages = {1018--1031},
abstract = {Background: The apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) has emerged as a candidate for prognosticating traumatic brain injury (TBI) recovery, with APOE$epsilon$4 identified as a susceptibility marker for poor outcome, despite large discrepancy in its reported influence post-TBI.Methods: A systematic review was conducted, including all primary articles investigating the role of APOE$epsilon$4 on TBI outcome. A total of 65 studies were included, including 24 predominantly investigating mild (mTBI), seven moderate (modTBI) and 33 severe (sTBI); severity was not reported in one study.Results: In mTBI studies, the association between APOE$epsilon$4 and post-TBI outcome was concluded as non-contributory in 14 studies (58.3%), hazardous in nine (37.5%) and protective in one (4.2%). In sTBI studies, the role of APOE$epsilon$4 was hazardous in 21 (63.6%), non-contributory in nine (27.3%) and protective in three (9.1%). Of the seven studies investigating dementia outcomes, four observed a hazardous association with APOE$epsilon$4, while three reported no association. Six studies examined Alzheimers dementia pathology, of which three reported a hazardous influence of APOE$epsilon$4.Conclusions: The influence of APOE$epsilon$4 on neuropsychological testing, functional outcome and in paediatric populations was incongruous. This review supports the majority of research indicating APOE$epsilon$4 adversely influences recovery following TBI, particularly with respect to dementia-related outcomes and outcomes following sTBI. © 2015 Taylor \& Francis Group, LLC.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Makdissi, M; Davis, G; McCrory, P
Clinical challenges in the diagnosis and assessment of sports-related concussion Journal Article
In: Neurology: Clinical Practice, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 2–5, 2015.
@article{Makdissi2015,
title = {Clinical challenges in the diagnosis and assessment of sports-related concussion},
author = {Makdissi, M and Davis, G and McCrory, P},
doi = {10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000061},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Neurology: Clinical Practice},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
pages = {2--5},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Lawrence, D W; Comper, P; Hutchison, M G; Sharma, B
The role of apolipoprotein E episilon ($epsilon$)-4 allele on outcome following traumatic brain injury: A systematic review Journal Article
In: Brain Injury, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 1018–1031, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: 80 and over, aged, allele, Alleles, Alzheimer disease, amyloid beta protein, APOE, apolipoprotein E, apolipoprotein E4, Article, athlete, brain concussion, Brain Injuries, clinical evaluation, cognition, cognitive defect, disease severity, Female, follow up, genetic association, genetic risk, genetics, GENOTYPE, Glasgow Outcome Scale, heterozygote, histopathology, homozygote, human, Humans, Incidence, injury severity, Male, Memory, nerve cell necrosis, neuropathology, Neuroprotection, outcome assessment, pediatrics, Prevalence, Prognosis, prognostic assessment, protein function, psychologic test, psychology, Recovery, scoring system, Systematic Review, tau protein, traumatic brain injury, treatment outcome, very elderly, Wechsler Intelligence Scale
@article{Lawrence2015,
title = {The role of apolipoprotein E episilon ($epsilon$)-4 allele on outcome following traumatic brain injury: A systematic review},
author = {Lawrence, D W and Comper, P and Hutchison, M G and Sharma, B},
doi = {10.3109/02699052.2015.1005131},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Brain Injury},
volume = {29},
number = {9},
pages = {1018--1031},
abstract = {Background: The apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) has emerged as a candidate for prognosticating traumatic brain injury (TBI) recovery, with APOE$epsilon$4 identified as a susceptibility marker for poor outcome, despite large discrepancy in its reported influence post-TBI.Methods: A systematic review was conducted, including all primary articles investigating the role of APOE$epsilon$4 on TBI outcome. A total of 65 studies were included, including 24 predominantly investigating mild (mTBI), seven moderate (modTBI) and 33 severe (sTBI); severity was not reported in one study.Results: In mTBI studies, the association between APOE$epsilon$4 and post-TBI outcome was concluded as non-contributory in 14 studies (58.3%), hazardous in nine (37.5%) and protective in one (4.2%). In sTBI studies, the role of APOE$epsilon$4 was hazardous in 21 (63.6%), non-contributory in nine (27.3%) and protective in three (9.1%). Of the seven studies investigating dementia outcomes, four observed a hazardous association with APOE$epsilon$4, while three reported no association. Six studies examined Alzheimers dementia pathology, of which three reported a hazardous influence of APOE$epsilon$4.Conclusions: The influence of APOE$epsilon$4 on neuropsychological testing, functional outcome and in paediatric populations was incongruous. This review supports the majority of research indicating APOE$epsilon$4 adversely influences recovery following TBI, particularly with respect to dementia-related outcomes and outcomes following sTBI. © 2015 Taylor \& Francis Group, LLC.},
keywords = {80 and over, aged, allele, Alleles, Alzheimer disease, amyloid beta protein, APOE, apolipoprotein E, apolipoprotein E4, Article, athlete, brain concussion, Brain Injuries, clinical evaluation, cognition, cognitive defect, disease severity, Female, follow up, genetic association, genetic risk, genetics, GENOTYPE, Glasgow Outcome Scale, heterozygote, histopathology, homozygote, human, Humans, Incidence, injury severity, Male, Memory, nerve cell necrosis, neuropathology, Neuroprotection, outcome assessment, pediatrics, Prevalence, Prognosis, prognostic assessment, protein function, psychologic test, psychology, Recovery, scoring system, Systematic Review, tau protein, traumatic brain injury, treatment outcome, very elderly, Wechsler Intelligence Scale},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Makdissi, M; Davis, G; McCrory, P
Clinical challenges in the diagnosis and assessment of sports-related concussion Journal Article
In: Neurology: Clinical Practice, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 2–5, 2015.
Links | BibTeX | Tags: athlete, biological marker, checklist, clinical assessment, clinical evaluation, clinical study, competition, Concussion, Consensus, CONVALESCENCE, cost control, DECISION making, false negative result, functional disease, gold standard, human, learning, long term care, medical assessment, medical decision making, priority journal, prospective study, reaction time, recall, retrospective study, Review, risk factor, saccadic eye movement, self report, Sensitivity and Specificity, short term memory, sport injury, symptom, test retest reliability, visual system
@article{Makdissi2015,
title = {Clinical challenges in the diagnosis and assessment of sports-related concussion},
author = {Makdissi, M and Davis, G and McCrory, P},
doi = {10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000061},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Neurology: Clinical Practice},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
pages = {2--5},
keywords = {athlete, biological marker, checklist, clinical assessment, clinical evaluation, clinical study, competition, Concussion, Consensus, CONVALESCENCE, cost control, DECISION making, false negative result, functional disease, gold standard, human, learning, long term care, medical assessment, medical decision making, priority journal, prospective study, reaction time, recall, retrospective study, Review, risk factor, saccadic eye movement, self report, Sensitivity and Specificity, short term memory, sport injury, symptom, test retest reliability, visual system},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}