Halstead, M E
Pharmacologic Therapies for Pediatric Concussions Journal Article
In: Sports & Health, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 50–52, 2016.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Acetaminophen/tu [Therapeutic Use], *Analgesics, *Anti-Inflammatory Agents, *Athletic Injuries/co [Complications], *Brain Concussion/co [Complications], *Post-Traumatic Headache/et [Etiology], 0 (Analgesics, 0 (Anti-Inflammatory Agents, 362O9ITL9D (Acetaminophen), Athletic Injuries/dt [Drug Therapy], Brain Concussion/dt [Drug Therapy], Child, Consensus, Humans, Non-Narcotic), Non-Narcotic/tu [Therapeutic Use], Non-Steroidal), Non-Steroidal/tu [Thera, Physicians'/sn [Statistics & Nu, Post-Traumatic Headache/dt [Drug Therapy], Practice Guidelines as Topic, Practice Patterns, Recovery of Function, Retrospective Studies
@article{Halstead2016,
title = {Pharmacologic Therapies for Pediatric Concussions},
author = {Halstead, M E},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Sports \& Health},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
pages = {50--52},
abstract = {CONTEXT: Pediatric concussions are common, and emphasis on correct diagnosis and management is stressed in consensus guidelines. Medications may have a role in management of concussion, but no consensus exists regarding appropriate pharmacologic therapy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Nonsystematic review. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. RESULTS: There is limited evidence for hypertonic saline to improve posttraumatic headache in the emergency department setting. There is essentially no evidence for the use of any other medication in management of pediatric sport-related concussion. CONCLUSION: Further research is necessary to determine whether there is benefit to the use of any pharmacotherapy in the management of pediatric-aged athletes with concussions.},
keywords = {*Acetaminophen/tu [Therapeutic Use], *Analgesics, *Anti-Inflammatory Agents, *Athletic Injuries/co [Complications], *Brain Concussion/co [Complications], *Post-Traumatic Headache/et [Etiology], 0 (Analgesics, 0 (Anti-Inflammatory Agents, 362O9ITL9D (Acetaminophen), Athletic Injuries/dt [Drug Therapy], Brain Concussion/dt [Drug Therapy], Child, Consensus, Humans, Non-Narcotic), Non-Narcotic/tu [Therapeutic Use], Non-Steroidal), Non-Steroidal/tu [Thera, Physicians'/sn [Statistics \& Nu, Post-Traumatic Headache/dt [Drug Therapy], Practice Guidelines as Topic, Practice Patterns, Recovery of Function, Retrospective Studies},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Makdissi, M; Davis, G; McCrory, P
Clinical challenges in the diagnosis and assessment of sports-related concussion Journal Article
In: Neurology: Clinical Practice, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 2–5, 2015.
Links | BibTeX | Tags: athlete, biological marker, checklist, clinical assessment, clinical evaluation, clinical study, competition, Concussion, Consensus, CONVALESCENCE, cost control, DECISION making, false negative result, functional disease, gold standard, human, learning, long term care, medical assessment, medical decision making, priority journal, prospective study, reaction time, recall, retrospective study, Review, risk factor, saccadic eye movement, self report, Sensitivity and Specificity, short term memory, sport injury, symptom, test retest reliability, visual system
@article{Makdissi2015,
title = {Clinical challenges in the diagnosis and assessment of sports-related concussion},
author = {Makdissi, M and Davis, G and McCrory, P},
doi = {10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000061},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Neurology: Clinical Practice},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
pages = {2--5},
keywords = {athlete, biological marker, checklist, clinical assessment, clinical evaluation, clinical study, competition, Concussion, Consensus, CONVALESCENCE, cost control, DECISION making, false negative result, functional disease, gold standard, human, learning, long term care, medical assessment, medical decision making, priority journal, prospective study, reaction time, recall, retrospective study, Review, risk factor, saccadic eye movement, self report, Sensitivity and Specificity, short term memory, sport injury, symptom, test retest reliability, visual system},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Timpka, T; Jacobsson, J; Ekberg, J; Finch, C F; Bichenbach, J; Edouard, P; Bargoria, V; Branco, P; Alonso, J M
In: Journal of Science & Medicine in Sport, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 643–650, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: accident, athletic performance, clinical examination, competition, Concussion, Consensus, Epidemiologic Methods, epidemiological data, EPIDEMIOLOGY, football, head injury, health service, human, Humans, information processing, Injuries, Medline, meta analysis, METHODOLOGY, musculoskeletal disease, neck injury, nomenclature, Overuse injuries, physical education, procedures, Qualitative methods, Research Design, Review, self report, sport injury, Sports epidemiology, sports injury, SPORTS medicine, Systematic Review, tennis, Terminology, Terminology as Topic, track and field, training
@article{Timpka2015,
title = {Meta-narrative analysis of sports injury reporting practices based on the Injury Definitions Concept Framework (IDCF): A review of consensus statements and epidemiological studies in athletics (track and field)},
author = {Timpka, T and Jacobsson, J and Ekberg, J and Finch, C F and Bichenbach, J and Edouard, P and Bargoria, V and Branco, P and Alonso, J M},
doi = {10.1016/j.jsams.2014.11.393},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Science \& Medicine in Sport},
volume = {18},
number = {6},
pages = {643--650},
abstract = {Objectives: Consistency in routines for reporting injury has been a focus of development efforts in sports epidemiology for a long time. To gain an improved understanding of current reporting practices, we applied the Injury Definitions Concept Framework (IDCF) in a review of injury reporting in a subset of the field. Design: Meta-narrative review. Methods: An analysis of injury definitions reported in consensus statements for different sports and studies of injury epidemiology in athletics (track and field) published in PubMed between 1980 and 2013 was performed. Separate narratives for each of the three reporting contexts in the IDCF were constructed from the data. Results: Six consensus statements and 14 studies reporting on athletics injury epidemiology fulfilled the selection criteria. The narratives on sports performance, clinical examination, and athlete self-report contexts were evenly represented in the eligible studies. The sports performance and athlete self-report narratives covered both professional and community athletes as well as training and competition settings. In the clinical examination narrative, data collection by health service professionals was linked to studies of professional athletes at international championships. Conclusions: From an application of the IDCF in a review of injury reporting in sports epidemiology we observed a parallel usage of reporting contexts in this field of research. The co-existence of reporting methodologies does not necessarily reflect a problematic situation, but only provided that firm precautions are taken when comparing studies performed in the different contexts. © 2014 Sports Medicine Australia.},
keywords = {accident, athletic performance, clinical examination, competition, Concussion, Consensus, Epidemiologic Methods, epidemiological data, EPIDEMIOLOGY, football, head injury, health service, human, Humans, information processing, Injuries, Medline, meta analysis, METHODOLOGY, musculoskeletal disease, neck injury, nomenclature, Overuse injuries, physical education, procedures, Qualitative methods, Research Design, Review, self report, sport injury, Sports epidemiology, sports injury, SPORTS medicine, Systematic Review, tennis, Terminology, Terminology as Topic, track and field, training},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Halstead, M E
Pharmacologic Therapies for Pediatric Concussions Journal Article
In: Sports & Health, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 50–52, 2016.
@article{Halstead2016,
title = {Pharmacologic Therapies for Pediatric Concussions},
author = {Halstead, M E},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Sports \& Health},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
pages = {50--52},
abstract = {CONTEXT: Pediatric concussions are common, and emphasis on correct diagnosis and management is stressed in consensus guidelines. Medications may have a role in management of concussion, but no consensus exists regarding appropriate pharmacologic therapy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Nonsystematic review. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. RESULTS: There is limited evidence for hypertonic saline to improve posttraumatic headache in the emergency department setting. There is essentially no evidence for the use of any other medication in management of pediatric sport-related concussion. CONCLUSION: Further research is necessary to determine whether there is benefit to the use of any pharmacotherapy in the management of pediatric-aged athletes with concussions.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Makdissi, M; Davis, G; McCrory, P
Clinical challenges in the diagnosis and assessment of sports-related concussion Journal Article
In: Neurology: Clinical Practice, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 2–5, 2015.
@article{Makdissi2015,
title = {Clinical challenges in the diagnosis and assessment of sports-related concussion},
author = {Makdissi, M and Davis, G and McCrory, P},
doi = {10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000061},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Neurology: Clinical Practice},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
pages = {2--5},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Timpka, T; Jacobsson, J; Ekberg, J; Finch, C F; Bichenbach, J; Edouard, P; Bargoria, V; Branco, P; Alonso, J M
In: Journal of Science & Medicine in Sport, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 643–650, 2015.
@article{Timpka2015,
title = {Meta-narrative analysis of sports injury reporting practices based on the Injury Definitions Concept Framework (IDCF): A review of consensus statements and epidemiological studies in athletics (track and field)},
author = {Timpka, T and Jacobsson, J and Ekberg, J and Finch, C F and Bichenbach, J and Edouard, P and Bargoria, V and Branco, P and Alonso, J M},
doi = {10.1016/j.jsams.2014.11.393},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Science \& Medicine in Sport},
volume = {18},
number = {6},
pages = {643--650},
abstract = {Objectives: Consistency in routines for reporting injury has been a focus of development efforts in sports epidemiology for a long time. To gain an improved understanding of current reporting practices, we applied the Injury Definitions Concept Framework (IDCF) in a review of injury reporting in a subset of the field. Design: Meta-narrative review. Methods: An analysis of injury definitions reported in consensus statements for different sports and studies of injury epidemiology in athletics (track and field) published in PubMed between 1980 and 2013 was performed. Separate narratives for each of the three reporting contexts in the IDCF were constructed from the data. Results: Six consensus statements and 14 studies reporting on athletics injury epidemiology fulfilled the selection criteria. The narratives on sports performance, clinical examination, and athlete self-report contexts were evenly represented in the eligible studies. The sports performance and athlete self-report narratives covered both professional and community athletes as well as training and competition settings. In the clinical examination narrative, data collection by health service professionals was linked to studies of professional athletes at international championships. Conclusions: From an application of the IDCF in a review of injury reporting in sports epidemiology we observed a parallel usage of reporting contexts in this field of research. The co-existence of reporting methodologies does not necessarily reflect a problematic situation, but only provided that firm precautions are taken when comparing studies performed in the different contexts. © 2014 Sports Medicine Australia.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Halstead, M E
Pharmacologic Therapies for Pediatric Concussions Journal Article
In: Sports & Health, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 50–52, 2016.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Acetaminophen/tu [Therapeutic Use], *Analgesics, *Anti-Inflammatory Agents, *Athletic Injuries/co [Complications], *Brain Concussion/co [Complications], *Post-Traumatic Headache/et [Etiology], 0 (Analgesics, 0 (Anti-Inflammatory Agents, 362O9ITL9D (Acetaminophen), Athletic Injuries/dt [Drug Therapy], Brain Concussion/dt [Drug Therapy], Child, Consensus, Humans, Non-Narcotic), Non-Narcotic/tu [Therapeutic Use], Non-Steroidal), Non-Steroidal/tu [Thera, Physicians'/sn [Statistics & Nu, Post-Traumatic Headache/dt [Drug Therapy], Practice Guidelines as Topic, Practice Patterns, Recovery of Function, Retrospective Studies
@article{Halstead2016,
title = {Pharmacologic Therapies for Pediatric Concussions},
author = {Halstead, M E},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Sports \& Health},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
pages = {50--52},
abstract = {CONTEXT: Pediatric concussions are common, and emphasis on correct diagnosis and management is stressed in consensus guidelines. Medications may have a role in management of concussion, but no consensus exists regarding appropriate pharmacologic therapy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Nonsystematic review. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. RESULTS: There is limited evidence for hypertonic saline to improve posttraumatic headache in the emergency department setting. There is essentially no evidence for the use of any other medication in management of pediatric sport-related concussion. CONCLUSION: Further research is necessary to determine whether there is benefit to the use of any pharmacotherapy in the management of pediatric-aged athletes with concussions.},
keywords = {*Acetaminophen/tu [Therapeutic Use], *Analgesics, *Anti-Inflammatory Agents, *Athletic Injuries/co [Complications], *Brain Concussion/co [Complications], *Post-Traumatic Headache/et [Etiology], 0 (Analgesics, 0 (Anti-Inflammatory Agents, 362O9ITL9D (Acetaminophen), Athletic Injuries/dt [Drug Therapy], Brain Concussion/dt [Drug Therapy], Child, Consensus, Humans, Non-Narcotic), Non-Narcotic/tu [Therapeutic Use], Non-Steroidal), Non-Steroidal/tu [Thera, Physicians'/sn [Statistics \& Nu, Post-Traumatic Headache/dt [Drug Therapy], Practice Guidelines as Topic, Practice Patterns, Recovery of Function, Retrospective Studies},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Makdissi, M; Davis, G; McCrory, P
Clinical challenges in the diagnosis and assessment of sports-related concussion Journal Article
In: Neurology: Clinical Practice, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 2–5, 2015.
Links | BibTeX | Tags: athlete, biological marker, checklist, clinical assessment, clinical evaluation, clinical study, competition, Concussion, Consensus, CONVALESCENCE, cost control, DECISION making, false negative result, functional disease, gold standard, human, learning, long term care, medical assessment, medical decision making, priority journal, prospective study, reaction time, recall, retrospective study, Review, risk factor, saccadic eye movement, self report, Sensitivity and Specificity, short term memory, sport injury, symptom, test retest reliability, visual system
@article{Makdissi2015,
title = {Clinical challenges in the diagnosis and assessment of sports-related concussion},
author = {Makdissi, M and Davis, G and McCrory, P},
doi = {10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000061},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Neurology: Clinical Practice},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
pages = {2--5},
keywords = {athlete, biological marker, checklist, clinical assessment, clinical evaluation, clinical study, competition, Concussion, Consensus, CONVALESCENCE, cost control, DECISION making, false negative result, functional disease, gold standard, human, learning, long term care, medical assessment, medical decision making, priority journal, prospective study, reaction time, recall, retrospective study, Review, risk factor, saccadic eye movement, self report, Sensitivity and Specificity, short term memory, sport injury, symptom, test retest reliability, visual system},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Timpka, T; Jacobsson, J; Ekberg, J; Finch, C F; Bichenbach, J; Edouard, P; Bargoria, V; Branco, P; Alonso, J M
In: Journal of Science & Medicine in Sport, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 643–650, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: accident, athletic performance, clinical examination, competition, Concussion, Consensus, Epidemiologic Methods, epidemiological data, EPIDEMIOLOGY, football, head injury, health service, human, Humans, information processing, Injuries, Medline, meta analysis, METHODOLOGY, musculoskeletal disease, neck injury, nomenclature, Overuse injuries, physical education, procedures, Qualitative methods, Research Design, Review, self report, sport injury, Sports epidemiology, sports injury, SPORTS medicine, Systematic Review, tennis, Terminology, Terminology as Topic, track and field, training
@article{Timpka2015,
title = {Meta-narrative analysis of sports injury reporting practices based on the Injury Definitions Concept Framework (IDCF): A review of consensus statements and epidemiological studies in athletics (track and field)},
author = {Timpka, T and Jacobsson, J and Ekberg, J and Finch, C F and Bichenbach, J and Edouard, P and Bargoria, V and Branco, P and Alonso, J M},
doi = {10.1016/j.jsams.2014.11.393},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Science \& Medicine in Sport},
volume = {18},
number = {6},
pages = {643--650},
abstract = {Objectives: Consistency in routines for reporting injury has been a focus of development efforts in sports epidemiology for a long time. To gain an improved understanding of current reporting practices, we applied the Injury Definitions Concept Framework (IDCF) in a review of injury reporting in a subset of the field. Design: Meta-narrative review. Methods: An analysis of injury definitions reported in consensus statements for different sports and studies of injury epidemiology in athletics (track and field) published in PubMed between 1980 and 2013 was performed. Separate narratives for each of the three reporting contexts in the IDCF were constructed from the data. Results: Six consensus statements and 14 studies reporting on athletics injury epidemiology fulfilled the selection criteria. The narratives on sports performance, clinical examination, and athlete self-report contexts were evenly represented in the eligible studies. The sports performance and athlete self-report narratives covered both professional and community athletes as well as training and competition settings. In the clinical examination narrative, data collection by health service professionals was linked to studies of professional athletes at international championships. Conclusions: From an application of the IDCF in a review of injury reporting in sports epidemiology we observed a parallel usage of reporting contexts in this field of research. The co-existence of reporting methodologies does not necessarily reflect a problematic situation, but only provided that firm precautions are taken when comparing studies performed in the different contexts. © 2014 Sports Medicine Australia.},
keywords = {accident, athletic performance, clinical examination, competition, Concussion, Consensus, Epidemiologic Methods, epidemiological data, EPIDEMIOLOGY, football, head injury, health service, human, Humans, information processing, Injuries, Medline, meta analysis, METHODOLOGY, musculoskeletal disease, neck injury, nomenclature, Overuse injuries, physical education, procedures, Qualitative methods, Research Design, Review, self report, sport injury, Sports epidemiology, sports injury, SPORTS medicine, Systematic Review, tennis, Terminology, Terminology as Topic, track and field, training},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}