Halim, A; Lamikanra, O E; Sutton, K
Female Athletes: Unique Challenges Facing Women Warriors Journal Article
In: American Journal of Orthopedics, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 12–15, 2016.
BibTeX | Tags: adverse effects, anterior cruciate ligament, Athletic Injuries, Bone Diseases, brain concussion, caloric restriction, Female, human, Humans, Injuries, legislation and jurisprudence, malnutrition, Menstruation Disturbances, Metabolic, Nutrition Disorders, patient safety, pregnancy, prevention and control, sexism, SOCIAL justice, social problem, Social Problems, Sport, Sports, standards, Syndrome, UNITED States
@article{Halim2016,
title = {Female Athletes: Unique Challenges Facing Women Warriors},
author = {Halim, A and Lamikanra, O E and Sutton, K},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Orthopedics},
volume = {45},
number = {1},
pages = {12--15},
keywords = {adverse effects, anterior cruciate ligament, Athletic Injuries, Bone Diseases, brain concussion, caloric restriction, Female, human, Humans, Injuries, legislation and jurisprudence, malnutrition, Menstruation Disturbances, Metabolic, Nutrition Disorders, patient safety, pregnancy, prevention and control, sexism, SOCIAL justice, social problem, Social Problems, Sport, Sports, standards, Syndrome, UNITED States},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Cobb, B R; Zadnik, A M; Rowson, S
Comparative analysis of helmeted impact response of Hybrid III and National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment headforms Journal Article
In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, vol. 230, no. 1, pp. 50–60, 2016.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Acceleration, Accident prevention, Angular acceleration, Biomechanics, Brain Injury, Coefficient of variation values, Comparative analysis, Concussion, Equipment, Evaluation protocol, helmet testing, Linear acceleration, Linear accelerations, Rotational acceleration, Safety devices, Sporting goods, standards
@article{Cobb2016,
title = {Comparative analysis of helmeted impact response of Hybrid III and National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment headforms},
author = {Cobb, B R and Zadnik, A M and Rowson, S},
doi = {10.1177/1754337115599133},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology},
volume = {230},
number = {1},
pages = {50--60},
abstract = {As advanced helmet testing methodologies are developed, the effect headform selection may have on the biomechanical impact response must be considered. This study sought to assess response differences between two of the most commonly used headforms, the Hybrid III and National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment headforms, through a series of helmeted impact tests. A total of 180 pendulum impact tests were conducted with three impactor velocities and six impact locations. Test condition-specific significant differences were found between the two headforms for peak linear and angular accelerations ($alpha$ = 0.05), although differences tended to be small. On average, the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment headform experienced higher peak linear (3.7 ± 7.8%) and angular (12.0 ± 21.6%) accelerations, with some of the largest differences associated with impacts to the facemask. Without the facemask impacts, the average differences in linear (1.8 ± 6.0%) and angular (9.6 ± 15.9%) acceleration would be lower. No significant differences were found in coefficient of variation values for linear (Hybrid III: 2.6 ± 2.3%, National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment: 2.0 ± 1.4%) or angular (Hybrid III: 4.9 ± 4.0%; National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment: 5.2 ± 5.8%) acceleration. These data have application toward development and validation of future helmet evaluation protocols and standards. © IMechE 2015.},
keywords = {Acceleration, Accident prevention, Angular acceleration, Biomechanics, Brain Injury, Coefficient of variation values, Comparative analysis, Concussion, Equipment, Evaluation protocol, helmet testing, Linear acceleration, Linear accelerations, Rotational acceleration, Safety devices, Sporting goods, standards},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bowman, T G; Breedlove, K M; Breedlove, E L; Dodge, T M; Nauman, E A
Impact attenuation properties of new and used lacrosse helmets Journal Article
In: Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 48, no. 14, pp. 3782–3787, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Accident prevention, Article, Athletic Injuries, attenuation, brain concussion, Cracks, Drop test, Drops, Equipment Design, Gadd Severity Index, head impact, Head Protective Devices, Helmet, Helmet evaluation, human, Humans, Injuries, lacrosse helmet, Materials testing, mechanical stress, priority journal, protective equipment, racquet sport, Racquet Sports, recertification, rigidity, Safety devices, Severity index, Sporting goods, Sports Equipment, standards, stress strain relationship, velocity
@article{Bowman2015,
title = {Impact attenuation properties of new and used lacrosse helmets},
author = {Bowman, T G and Breedlove, K M and Breedlove, E L and Dodge, T M and Nauman, E A},
doi = {10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.08.026},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Biomechanics},
volume = {48},
number = {14},
pages = {3782--3787},
abstract = {The National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) has developed impact attenuation thresholds that protective helmets worn in sport must meet to be commercially available in an attempt to prevent injury. It remains unknown how normal helmet use in athletic activity alters the force attenuation ability of lacrosse helmets. We tested 3 new and 3 randomly selected used helmets from 2 popular lacrosse models (Cascade Pro7, Cascade CPXR). All used helmets had been worn for 3 collegiate seasons prior to testing and had never been refurbished. Helmets were drop-tested using 3 prescribed impact velocities at 6 locations according to the NOCSAE lacrosse helmet standard, and we compared the Gadd Severity Index (GSI) scores between new and used helmets using a repeated measure ANOVA with location as the repeated variable and data separated by impact velocity. All 12 helmets passed the NOCSAE GSI threshold for all testing conditions; however 1 used helmet shell cracked resulting in a failed test. We found a significant main effect for helmet age at the low (F5},
keywords = {Accident prevention, Article, Athletic Injuries, attenuation, brain concussion, Cracks, Drop test, Drops, Equipment Design, Gadd Severity Index, head impact, Head Protective Devices, Helmet, Helmet evaluation, human, Humans, Injuries, lacrosse helmet, Materials testing, mechanical stress, priority journal, protective equipment, racquet sport, Racquet Sports, recertification, rigidity, Safety devices, Severity index, Sporting goods, Sports Equipment, standards, stress strain relationship, velocity},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Anonymous,
Tackling in youth football Journal Article
In: Pediatrics, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. e1419–e1430, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Adolescent, ankle injury, athlete, Athletic Injuries, causal attribution, Child, Concussion, contusion, Craniocerebral Trauma, disease association, football, hand injury, head and neck injury, human, Humans, Injuries, injury severity, knee injury, muscle training, Neck Injuries, Neck muscle, nonhuman, Preschool, preschool child, priority journal, protective equipment, quadriplegia, Review, sport injury, standards, strategic planning
@article{Anonymous2015,
title = {Tackling in youth football},
author = {Anonymous},
doi = {10.1542/peds.2015-3282},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Pediatrics},
volume = {136},
number = {5},
pages = {e1419--e1430},
abstract = {American football remains one of the most popular sports for young athletes. The injuries sustained during football, especially those to the head and neck, have been a topic of intense interest recently in both the public media and medical literature. The recognition of these injuries and the potential for longterm sequelae have led some physicians to call for a reduction in the number of contact practices, a postponement of tackling until a certain age, and even a ban on high school football. This statement reviews the literature regarding injuries in football, particularly those of the head and neck, the relationship between tackling and football-related injuries, and the potential effects of limiting or delaying tackling on injury risk. © 2015 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.},
keywords = {Adolescent, ankle injury, athlete, Athletic Injuries, causal attribution, Child, Concussion, contusion, Craniocerebral Trauma, disease association, football, hand injury, head and neck injury, human, Humans, Injuries, injury severity, knee injury, muscle training, Neck Injuries, Neck muscle, nonhuman, Preschool, preschool child, priority journal, protective equipment, quadriplegia, Review, sport injury, standards, strategic planning},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Oliaro, S
Concussion and post-concussion syndrome Journal Article
In: Sports Medicine Update, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 23–26, 1995.
BibTeX | Tags: *BRAIN -- Concussion, *DIAGNOSIS, *SPORTS, *THERAPEUTICS, METHODOLOGY, neuropsychology, Second impact syndrome, standards
@article{Oliaro1995,
title = {Concussion and post-concussion syndrome},
author = {Oliaro, S},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-01-01},
journal = {Sports Medicine Update},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {23--26},
address = {;},
keywords = {*BRAIN -- Concussion, *DIAGNOSIS, *SPORTS, *THERAPEUTICS, METHODOLOGY, neuropsychology, Second impact syndrome, standards},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Halim, A; Lamikanra, O E; Sutton, K
Female Athletes: Unique Challenges Facing Women Warriors Journal Article
In: American Journal of Orthopedics, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 12–15, 2016.
@article{Halim2016,
title = {Female Athletes: Unique Challenges Facing Women Warriors},
author = {Halim, A and Lamikanra, O E and Sutton, K},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Orthopedics},
volume = {45},
number = {1},
pages = {12--15},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Cobb, B R; Zadnik, A M; Rowson, S
Comparative analysis of helmeted impact response of Hybrid III and National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment headforms Journal Article
In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, vol. 230, no. 1, pp. 50–60, 2016.
@article{Cobb2016,
title = {Comparative analysis of helmeted impact response of Hybrid III and National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment headforms},
author = {Cobb, B R and Zadnik, A M and Rowson, S},
doi = {10.1177/1754337115599133},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology},
volume = {230},
number = {1},
pages = {50--60},
abstract = {As advanced helmet testing methodologies are developed, the effect headform selection may have on the biomechanical impact response must be considered. This study sought to assess response differences between two of the most commonly used headforms, the Hybrid III and National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment headforms, through a series of helmeted impact tests. A total of 180 pendulum impact tests were conducted with three impactor velocities and six impact locations. Test condition-specific significant differences were found between the two headforms for peak linear and angular accelerations ($alpha$ = 0.05), although differences tended to be small. On average, the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment headform experienced higher peak linear (3.7 ± 7.8%) and angular (12.0 ± 21.6%) accelerations, with some of the largest differences associated with impacts to the facemask. Without the facemask impacts, the average differences in linear (1.8 ± 6.0%) and angular (9.6 ± 15.9%) acceleration would be lower. No significant differences were found in coefficient of variation values for linear (Hybrid III: 2.6 ± 2.3%, National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment: 2.0 ± 1.4%) or angular (Hybrid III: 4.9 ± 4.0%; National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment: 5.2 ± 5.8%) acceleration. These data have application toward development and validation of future helmet evaluation protocols and standards. © IMechE 2015.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bowman, T G; Breedlove, K M; Breedlove, E L; Dodge, T M; Nauman, E A
Impact attenuation properties of new and used lacrosse helmets Journal Article
In: Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 48, no. 14, pp. 3782–3787, 2015.
@article{Bowman2015,
title = {Impact attenuation properties of new and used lacrosse helmets},
author = {Bowman, T G and Breedlove, K M and Breedlove, E L and Dodge, T M and Nauman, E A},
doi = {10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.08.026},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Biomechanics},
volume = {48},
number = {14},
pages = {3782--3787},
abstract = {The National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) has developed impact attenuation thresholds that protective helmets worn in sport must meet to be commercially available in an attempt to prevent injury. It remains unknown how normal helmet use in athletic activity alters the force attenuation ability of lacrosse helmets. We tested 3 new and 3 randomly selected used helmets from 2 popular lacrosse models (Cascade Pro7, Cascade CPXR). All used helmets had been worn for 3 collegiate seasons prior to testing and had never been refurbished. Helmets were drop-tested using 3 prescribed impact velocities at 6 locations according to the NOCSAE lacrosse helmet standard, and we compared the Gadd Severity Index (GSI) scores between new and used helmets using a repeated measure ANOVA with location as the repeated variable and data separated by impact velocity. All 12 helmets passed the NOCSAE GSI threshold for all testing conditions; however 1 used helmet shell cracked resulting in a failed test. We found a significant main effect for helmet age at the low (F5},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Anonymous,
Tackling in youth football Journal Article
In: Pediatrics, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. e1419–e1430, 2015.
@article{Anonymous2015,
title = {Tackling in youth football},
author = {Anonymous},
doi = {10.1542/peds.2015-3282},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Pediatrics},
volume = {136},
number = {5},
pages = {e1419--e1430},
abstract = {American football remains one of the most popular sports for young athletes. The injuries sustained during football, especially those to the head and neck, have been a topic of intense interest recently in both the public media and medical literature. The recognition of these injuries and the potential for longterm sequelae have led some physicians to call for a reduction in the number of contact practices, a postponement of tackling until a certain age, and even a ban on high school football. This statement reviews the literature regarding injuries in football, particularly those of the head and neck, the relationship between tackling and football-related injuries, and the potential effects of limiting or delaying tackling on injury risk. © 2015 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Oliaro, S
Concussion and post-concussion syndrome Journal Article
In: Sports Medicine Update, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 23–26, 1995.
@article{Oliaro1995,
title = {Concussion and post-concussion syndrome},
author = {Oliaro, S},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-01-01},
journal = {Sports Medicine Update},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {23--26},
address = {;},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Halim, A; Lamikanra, O E; Sutton, K
Female Athletes: Unique Challenges Facing Women Warriors Journal Article
In: American Journal of Orthopedics, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 12–15, 2016.
BibTeX | Tags: adverse effects, anterior cruciate ligament, Athletic Injuries, Bone Diseases, brain concussion, caloric restriction, Female, human, Humans, Injuries, legislation and jurisprudence, malnutrition, Menstruation Disturbances, Metabolic, Nutrition Disorders, patient safety, pregnancy, prevention and control, sexism, SOCIAL justice, social problem, Social Problems, Sport, Sports, standards, Syndrome, UNITED States
@article{Halim2016,
title = {Female Athletes: Unique Challenges Facing Women Warriors},
author = {Halim, A and Lamikanra, O E and Sutton, K},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {American Journal of Orthopedics},
volume = {45},
number = {1},
pages = {12--15},
keywords = {adverse effects, anterior cruciate ligament, Athletic Injuries, Bone Diseases, brain concussion, caloric restriction, Female, human, Humans, Injuries, legislation and jurisprudence, malnutrition, Menstruation Disturbances, Metabolic, Nutrition Disorders, patient safety, pregnancy, prevention and control, sexism, SOCIAL justice, social problem, Social Problems, Sport, Sports, standards, Syndrome, UNITED States},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Cobb, B R; Zadnik, A M; Rowson, S
Comparative analysis of helmeted impact response of Hybrid III and National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment headforms Journal Article
In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, vol. 230, no. 1, pp. 50–60, 2016.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Acceleration, Accident prevention, Angular acceleration, Biomechanics, Brain Injury, Coefficient of variation values, Comparative analysis, Concussion, Equipment, Evaluation protocol, helmet testing, Linear acceleration, Linear accelerations, Rotational acceleration, Safety devices, Sporting goods, standards
@article{Cobb2016,
title = {Comparative analysis of helmeted impact response of Hybrid III and National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment headforms},
author = {Cobb, B R and Zadnik, A M and Rowson, S},
doi = {10.1177/1754337115599133},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology},
volume = {230},
number = {1},
pages = {50--60},
abstract = {As advanced helmet testing methodologies are developed, the effect headform selection may have on the biomechanical impact response must be considered. This study sought to assess response differences between two of the most commonly used headforms, the Hybrid III and National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment headforms, through a series of helmeted impact tests. A total of 180 pendulum impact tests were conducted with three impactor velocities and six impact locations. Test condition-specific significant differences were found between the two headforms for peak linear and angular accelerations ($alpha$ = 0.05), although differences tended to be small. On average, the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment headform experienced higher peak linear (3.7 ± 7.8%) and angular (12.0 ± 21.6%) accelerations, with some of the largest differences associated with impacts to the facemask. Without the facemask impacts, the average differences in linear (1.8 ± 6.0%) and angular (9.6 ± 15.9%) acceleration would be lower. No significant differences were found in coefficient of variation values for linear (Hybrid III: 2.6 ± 2.3%, National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment: 2.0 ± 1.4%) or angular (Hybrid III: 4.9 ± 4.0%; National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment: 5.2 ± 5.8%) acceleration. These data have application toward development and validation of future helmet evaluation protocols and standards. © IMechE 2015.},
keywords = {Acceleration, Accident prevention, Angular acceleration, Biomechanics, Brain Injury, Coefficient of variation values, Comparative analysis, Concussion, Equipment, Evaluation protocol, helmet testing, Linear acceleration, Linear accelerations, Rotational acceleration, Safety devices, Sporting goods, standards},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bowman, T G; Breedlove, K M; Breedlove, E L; Dodge, T M; Nauman, E A
Impact attenuation properties of new and used lacrosse helmets Journal Article
In: Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 48, no. 14, pp. 3782–3787, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Accident prevention, Article, Athletic Injuries, attenuation, brain concussion, Cracks, Drop test, Drops, Equipment Design, Gadd Severity Index, head impact, Head Protective Devices, Helmet, Helmet evaluation, human, Humans, Injuries, lacrosse helmet, Materials testing, mechanical stress, priority journal, protective equipment, racquet sport, Racquet Sports, recertification, rigidity, Safety devices, Severity index, Sporting goods, Sports Equipment, standards, stress strain relationship, velocity
@article{Bowman2015,
title = {Impact attenuation properties of new and used lacrosse helmets},
author = {Bowman, T G and Breedlove, K M and Breedlove, E L and Dodge, T M and Nauman, E A},
doi = {10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.08.026},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Biomechanics},
volume = {48},
number = {14},
pages = {3782--3787},
abstract = {The National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) has developed impact attenuation thresholds that protective helmets worn in sport must meet to be commercially available in an attempt to prevent injury. It remains unknown how normal helmet use in athletic activity alters the force attenuation ability of lacrosse helmets. We tested 3 new and 3 randomly selected used helmets from 2 popular lacrosse models (Cascade Pro7, Cascade CPXR). All used helmets had been worn for 3 collegiate seasons prior to testing and had never been refurbished. Helmets were drop-tested using 3 prescribed impact velocities at 6 locations according to the NOCSAE lacrosse helmet standard, and we compared the Gadd Severity Index (GSI) scores between new and used helmets using a repeated measure ANOVA with location as the repeated variable and data separated by impact velocity. All 12 helmets passed the NOCSAE GSI threshold for all testing conditions; however 1 used helmet shell cracked resulting in a failed test. We found a significant main effect for helmet age at the low (F5},
keywords = {Accident prevention, Article, Athletic Injuries, attenuation, brain concussion, Cracks, Drop test, Drops, Equipment Design, Gadd Severity Index, head impact, Head Protective Devices, Helmet, Helmet evaluation, human, Humans, Injuries, lacrosse helmet, Materials testing, mechanical stress, priority journal, protective equipment, racquet sport, Racquet Sports, recertification, rigidity, Safety devices, Severity index, Sporting goods, Sports Equipment, standards, stress strain relationship, velocity},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Anonymous,
Tackling in youth football Journal Article
In: Pediatrics, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. e1419–e1430, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Adolescent, ankle injury, athlete, Athletic Injuries, causal attribution, Child, Concussion, contusion, Craniocerebral Trauma, disease association, football, hand injury, head and neck injury, human, Humans, Injuries, injury severity, knee injury, muscle training, Neck Injuries, Neck muscle, nonhuman, Preschool, preschool child, priority journal, protective equipment, quadriplegia, Review, sport injury, standards, strategic planning
@article{Anonymous2015,
title = {Tackling in youth football},
author = {Anonymous},
doi = {10.1542/peds.2015-3282},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Pediatrics},
volume = {136},
number = {5},
pages = {e1419--e1430},
abstract = {American football remains one of the most popular sports for young athletes. The injuries sustained during football, especially those to the head and neck, have been a topic of intense interest recently in both the public media and medical literature. The recognition of these injuries and the potential for longterm sequelae have led some physicians to call for a reduction in the number of contact practices, a postponement of tackling until a certain age, and even a ban on high school football. This statement reviews the literature regarding injuries in football, particularly those of the head and neck, the relationship between tackling and football-related injuries, and the potential effects of limiting or delaying tackling on injury risk. © 2015 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.},
keywords = {Adolescent, ankle injury, athlete, Athletic Injuries, causal attribution, Child, Concussion, contusion, Craniocerebral Trauma, disease association, football, hand injury, head and neck injury, human, Humans, Injuries, injury severity, knee injury, muscle training, Neck Injuries, Neck muscle, nonhuman, Preschool, preschool child, priority journal, protective equipment, quadriplegia, Review, sport injury, standards, strategic planning},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Oliaro, S
Concussion and post-concussion syndrome Journal Article
In: Sports Medicine Update, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 23–26, 1995.
BibTeX | Tags: *BRAIN -- Concussion, *DIAGNOSIS, *SPORTS, *THERAPEUTICS, METHODOLOGY, neuropsychology, Second impact syndrome, standards
@article{Oliaro1995,
title = {Concussion and post-concussion syndrome},
author = {Oliaro, S},
year = {1995},
date = {1995-01-01},
journal = {Sports Medicine Update},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {23--26},
address = {;},
keywords = {*BRAIN -- Concussion, *DIAGNOSIS, *SPORTS, *THERAPEUTICS, METHODOLOGY, neuropsychology, Second impact syndrome, standards},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}