Weise, K K; Swanson, M W; Penix, K; Hale, M H; Ferguson, D
King-Devick and Pre-season Visual Function in Adolescent Athletes Journal Article
In: Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 89–95, 2017.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Adolescent, Alignment, Concussion, Convergence, Correlation coefficient, cross-sectional study, King-Devick, Ophthalmology, Optometers, Pupil function, Pupillometer, Repeated Measures, Sport, Time-differences, Vision screening, visual acuity, Visual functions
@article{Weise2017,
title = {King-Devick and Pre-season Visual Function in Adolescent Athletes},
author = {Weise, K K and Swanson, M W and Penix, K and Hale, M H and Ferguson, D},
doi = {10.1097/OPX.0000000000000938},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Optometry and Vision Science},
volume = {94},
number = {1},
pages = {89--95},
abstract = {Purpose The King-Devick test (KD) has been studied as a remove-from-play sideline test in college-age athletes and older; however, studies in younger athletes are limited. A cross-sectional study of the KD and other vision correlates was completed on school-aged athletes during pre-season physicals for a variety of sports to determine the repeatability of the KD. The study also evaluated how convergence, alignment, or pupil function contributed to a slower King-Devick baseline reading. Methods Seven hundred eighty-five athletes underwent vision screenings in a hospital or school setting by trained/certified staff as part of pre-season physicals. Six hundred nineteen had KD testing completed per the manufacturer's suggested protocol and repeated. Other baseline vision testing included visual acuity, Modified Thorington testing for alignment, convergence testing, and pupil function using the NeurOptics (NPI-200) NPi. Results The mean fastest, error-minimized KD time for all participants was 43.9 seconds(s) (SD ± 11.6, range 24-120). Median KD time got faster (+) with age (p \< 0.0001). The inter-class correlation coefficient for all scores was 0.92. The absolute mean time difference for any two tests was 3.5 s (SD ± 2.5, range 0-23). There was no association between the best KD time and reduced NPC (p = 0.63), Modified Thorington measure of alignment (p = 0.55), or NPi pupil function (p = 0.79). The Bland Altman repeated measure limits of agreement was ±6.5 seconds for those in the 10th to12th grades, and ±10.2 seconds for those in the 6th to 9th grades. Conclusions King-Devick score in junior high and high school athletes is variable but gets faster and more repeatable with increasing age. The KD does not correlate significantly with reduced convergence, alignment, or pupil function. Based on grouped data, a slowing of 10 seconds for younger athletes and 6 seconds for older athletes on a second administration represents a true difference in testing speed. Within-player variability should be considered when removal-from-play decisions are influenced by KD results. © 2016 American Academy of Optometry.},
keywords = {Adolescent, Alignment, Concussion, Convergence, Correlation coefficient, cross-sectional study, King-Devick, Ophthalmology, Optometers, Pupil function, Pupillometer, Repeated Measures, Sport, Time-differences, Vision screening, visual acuity, Visual functions},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Resch, Jacob; Driscoll, Aoife; McCaffrey, Noel; Brown, Cathleen; Ferrara, Michael S; Macciocchi, Stephen; Baumgartner, Ted; Walpert, Kimberly
ImPact Test-Retest Reliability: Reliably Unreliable? Journal Article
In: Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 506–511, 2013, ISBN: 1062-6050.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: ANALYSIS of variance, Body Weights and Measures, Cognition -- Evaluation, college, Computer Assisted, Continuing (Credit), Cross Sectional Studies, Data Analysis Software, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, DIAGNOSIS, Education, Effect Size, Female, human, Instrument Validation, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, Ireland, Male, Multicenter Studies, Neuropsychological Tests, ONE-way analysis of variance, Post Hoc Analysis, Repeated Measures, Scales, Students, test-retest reliability, UNITED States, Validation Studies, Young Adult
@article{Resch2013b,
title = {ImPact Test-Retest Reliability: Reliably Unreliable?},
author = {Resch, Jacob and Driscoll, Aoife and McCaffrey, Noel and Brown, Cathleen and Ferrara, Michael S and Macciocchi, Stephen and Baumgartner, Ted and Walpert, Kimberly},
doi = {10.4085/1062-6050-48.3.09},
isbn = {1062-6050},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Athletic Training},
volume = {48},
number = {4},
pages = {506--511},
abstract = {Context: Computerized neuropsychological testing is commonly used in the assessment and management of sport-related concussion. Even though computerized testing is widespread, psychometric evidence for test-retest reliability is somewhat limited. Additional evidence for test-retest reliability is needed to optimize clinical decision making after concussion. Objective: To document test-retest reliability for a commercially available computerized neuropsychological test battery (ImPACT) using 2 different clinically relevant time intervals. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Two research laboratories. Patients or Other Participants: Group 1 (n=46) consisted of 25 men and 21 women (age=22.4 ± 1.89 years). Group 2 (n = 45) consisted of 17 men and 28 women (age = 20.9 ± 1.72 years). Intervention(s): Both groups completed ImPACT forms 1, 2, and 3, which were delivered sequentially either at 1-week intervals (group 1) or at baseline, day 45, and day 50 (group 2). Group 2 also completed the Green Word Memory Test (WMT) as a measure of effort. Main Outcome Measures: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for the composite scores of ImPACT between time points. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate changes in ImPACT and WMT results over time. Results: The ICC values for group 1 ranged from 0.26 to 0.88 for the 4 ImPACT composite scores. The ICC values for group 2 ranged from 0.37 to 0.76. In group 1, ImPACT classified 37.0% and 46.0% of healthy participants as impaired at time points 2 and 3, respectively. In group 2, ImPACT classified 22.2% and 28.9% of healthy participants as impaired at time points 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusions: We found variable test-retest reliability for ImPACT metrics. Visual motor speed and reaction time demonstrated greater reliability than verbal and visual memory. Our current data support a multifaceted approach to concussion assessment using clinical examinations, symptom reports, cognitive testing, and balance assessment.},
keywords = {ANALYSIS of variance, Body Weights and Measures, Cognition -- Evaluation, college, Computer Assisted, Continuing (Credit), Cross Sectional Studies, Data Analysis Software, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, DIAGNOSIS, Education, Effect Size, Female, human, Instrument Validation, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, Ireland, Male, Multicenter Studies, Neuropsychological Tests, ONE-way analysis of variance, Post Hoc Analysis, Repeated Measures, Scales, Students, test-retest reliability, UNITED States, Validation Studies, Young Adult},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Weise, K K; Swanson, M W; Penix, K; Hale, M H; Ferguson, D
King-Devick and Pre-season Visual Function in Adolescent Athletes Journal Article
In: Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 89–95, 2017.
@article{Weise2017,
title = {King-Devick and Pre-season Visual Function in Adolescent Athletes},
author = {Weise, K K and Swanson, M W and Penix, K and Hale, M H and Ferguson, D},
doi = {10.1097/OPX.0000000000000938},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Optometry and Vision Science},
volume = {94},
number = {1},
pages = {89--95},
abstract = {Purpose The King-Devick test (KD) has been studied as a remove-from-play sideline test in college-age athletes and older; however, studies in younger athletes are limited. A cross-sectional study of the KD and other vision correlates was completed on school-aged athletes during pre-season physicals for a variety of sports to determine the repeatability of the KD. The study also evaluated how convergence, alignment, or pupil function contributed to a slower King-Devick baseline reading. Methods Seven hundred eighty-five athletes underwent vision screenings in a hospital or school setting by trained/certified staff as part of pre-season physicals. Six hundred nineteen had KD testing completed per the manufacturer's suggested protocol and repeated. Other baseline vision testing included visual acuity, Modified Thorington testing for alignment, convergence testing, and pupil function using the NeurOptics (NPI-200) NPi. Results The mean fastest, error-minimized KD time for all participants was 43.9 seconds(s) (SD ± 11.6, range 24-120). Median KD time got faster (+) with age (p \< 0.0001). The inter-class correlation coefficient for all scores was 0.92. The absolute mean time difference for any two tests was 3.5 s (SD ± 2.5, range 0-23). There was no association between the best KD time and reduced NPC (p = 0.63), Modified Thorington measure of alignment (p = 0.55), or NPi pupil function (p = 0.79). The Bland Altman repeated measure limits of agreement was ±6.5 seconds for those in the 10th to12th grades, and ±10.2 seconds for those in the 6th to 9th grades. Conclusions King-Devick score in junior high and high school athletes is variable but gets faster and more repeatable with increasing age. The KD does not correlate significantly with reduced convergence, alignment, or pupil function. Based on grouped data, a slowing of 10 seconds for younger athletes and 6 seconds for older athletes on a second administration represents a true difference in testing speed. Within-player variability should be considered when removal-from-play decisions are influenced by KD results. © 2016 American Academy of Optometry.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Resch, Jacob; Driscoll, Aoife; McCaffrey, Noel; Brown, Cathleen; Ferrara, Michael S; Macciocchi, Stephen; Baumgartner, Ted; Walpert, Kimberly
ImPact Test-Retest Reliability: Reliably Unreliable? Journal Article
In: Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 506–511, 2013, ISBN: 1062-6050.
@article{Resch2013b,
title = {ImPact Test-Retest Reliability: Reliably Unreliable?},
author = {Resch, Jacob and Driscoll, Aoife and McCaffrey, Noel and Brown, Cathleen and Ferrara, Michael S and Macciocchi, Stephen and Baumgartner, Ted and Walpert, Kimberly},
doi = {10.4085/1062-6050-48.3.09},
isbn = {1062-6050},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Athletic Training},
volume = {48},
number = {4},
pages = {506--511},
abstract = {Context: Computerized neuropsychological testing is commonly used in the assessment and management of sport-related concussion. Even though computerized testing is widespread, psychometric evidence for test-retest reliability is somewhat limited. Additional evidence for test-retest reliability is needed to optimize clinical decision making after concussion. Objective: To document test-retest reliability for a commercially available computerized neuropsychological test battery (ImPACT) using 2 different clinically relevant time intervals. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Two research laboratories. Patients or Other Participants: Group 1 (n=46) consisted of 25 men and 21 women (age=22.4 ± 1.89 years). Group 2 (n = 45) consisted of 17 men and 28 women (age = 20.9 ± 1.72 years). Intervention(s): Both groups completed ImPACT forms 1, 2, and 3, which were delivered sequentially either at 1-week intervals (group 1) or at baseline, day 45, and day 50 (group 2). Group 2 also completed the Green Word Memory Test (WMT) as a measure of effort. Main Outcome Measures: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for the composite scores of ImPACT between time points. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate changes in ImPACT and WMT results over time. Results: The ICC values for group 1 ranged from 0.26 to 0.88 for the 4 ImPACT composite scores. The ICC values for group 2 ranged from 0.37 to 0.76. In group 1, ImPACT classified 37.0% and 46.0% of healthy participants as impaired at time points 2 and 3, respectively. In group 2, ImPACT classified 22.2% and 28.9% of healthy participants as impaired at time points 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusions: We found variable test-retest reliability for ImPACT metrics. Visual motor speed and reaction time demonstrated greater reliability than verbal and visual memory. Our current data support a multifaceted approach to concussion assessment using clinical examinations, symptom reports, cognitive testing, and balance assessment.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Weise, K K; Swanson, M W; Penix, K; Hale, M H; Ferguson, D
King-Devick and Pre-season Visual Function in Adolescent Athletes Journal Article
In: Optometry and Vision Science, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 89–95, 2017.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Adolescent, Alignment, Concussion, Convergence, Correlation coefficient, cross-sectional study, King-Devick, Ophthalmology, Optometers, Pupil function, Pupillometer, Repeated Measures, Sport, Time-differences, Vision screening, visual acuity, Visual functions
@article{Weise2017,
title = {King-Devick and Pre-season Visual Function in Adolescent Athletes},
author = {Weise, K K and Swanson, M W and Penix, K and Hale, M H and Ferguson, D},
doi = {10.1097/OPX.0000000000000938},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Optometry and Vision Science},
volume = {94},
number = {1},
pages = {89--95},
abstract = {Purpose The King-Devick test (KD) has been studied as a remove-from-play sideline test in college-age athletes and older; however, studies in younger athletes are limited. A cross-sectional study of the KD and other vision correlates was completed on school-aged athletes during pre-season physicals for a variety of sports to determine the repeatability of the KD. The study also evaluated how convergence, alignment, or pupil function contributed to a slower King-Devick baseline reading. Methods Seven hundred eighty-five athletes underwent vision screenings in a hospital or school setting by trained/certified staff as part of pre-season physicals. Six hundred nineteen had KD testing completed per the manufacturer's suggested protocol and repeated. Other baseline vision testing included visual acuity, Modified Thorington testing for alignment, convergence testing, and pupil function using the NeurOptics (NPI-200) NPi. Results The mean fastest, error-minimized KD time for all participants was 43.9 seconds(s) (SD ± 11.6, range 24-120). Median KD time got faster (+) with age (p \< 0.0001). The inter-class correlation coefficient for all scores was 0.92. The absolute mean time difference for any two tests was 3.5 s (SD ± 2.5, range 0-23). There was no association between the best KD time and reduced NPC (p = 0.63), Modified Thorington measure of alignment (p = 0.55), or NPi pupil function (p = 0.79). The Bland Altman repeated measure limits of agreement was ±6.5 seconds for those in the 10th to12th grades, and ±10.2 seconds for those in the 6th to 9th grades. Conclusions King-Devick score in junior high and high school athletes is variable but gets faster and more repeatable with increasing age. The KD does not correlate significantly with reduced convergence, alignment, or pupil function. Based on grouped data, a slowing of 10 seconds for younger athletes and 6 seconds for older athletes on a second administration represents a true difference in testing speed. Within-player variability should be considered when removal-from-play decisions are influenced by KD results. © 2016 American Academy of Optometry.},
keywords = {Adolescent, Alignment, Concussion, Convergence, Correlation coefficient, cross-sectional study, King-Devick, Ophthalmology, Optometers, Pupil function, Pupillometer, Repeated Measures, Sport, Time-differences, Vision screening, visual acuity, Visual functions},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Resch, Jacob; Driscoll, Aoife; McCaffrey, Noel; Brown, Cathleen; Ferrara, Michael S; Macciocchi, Stephen; Baumgartner, Ted; Walpert, Kimberly
ImPact Test-Retest Reliability: Reliably Unreliable? Journal Article
In: Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 506–511, 2013, ISBN: 1062-6050.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: ANALYSIS of variance, Body Weights and Measures, Cognition -- Evaluation, college, Computer Assisted, Continuing (Credit), Cross Sectional Studies, Data Analysis Software, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, DIAGNOSIS, Education, Effect Size, Female, human, Instrument Validation, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, Ireland, Male, Multicenter Studies, Neuropsychological Tests, ONE-way analysis of variance, Post Hoc Analysis, Repeated Measures, Scales, Students, test-retest reliability, UNITED States, Validation Studies, Young Adult
@article{Resch2013b,
title = {ImPact Test-Retest Reliability: Reliably Unreliable?},
author = {Resch, Jacob and Driscoll, Aoife and McCaffrey, Noel and Brown, Cathleen and Ferrara, Michael S and Macciocchi, Stephen and Baumgartner, Ted and Walpert, Kimberly},
doi = {10.4085/1062-6050-48.3.09},
isbn = {1062-6050},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Athletic Training},
volume = {48},
number = {4},
pages = {506--511},
abstract = {Context: Computerized neuropsychological testing is commonly used in the assessment and management of sport-related concussion. Even though computerized testing is widespread, psychometric evidence for test-retest reliability is somewhat limited. Additional evidence for test-retest reliability is needed to optimize clinical decision making after concussion. Objective: To document test-retest reliability for a commercially available computerized neuropsychological test battery (ImPACT) using 2 different clinically relevant time intervals. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Two research laboratories. Patients or Other Participants: Group 1 (n=46) consisted of 25 men and 21 women (age=22.4 ± 1.89 years). Group 2 (n = 45) consisted of 17 men and 28 women (age = 20.9 ± 1.72 years). Intervention(s): Both groups completed ImPACT forms 1, 2, and 3, which were delivered sequentially either at 1-week intervals (group 1) or at baseline, day 45, and day 50 (group 2). Group 2 also completed the Green Word Memory Test (WMT) as a measure of effort. Main Outcome Measures: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for the composite scores of ImPACT between time points. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to evaluate changes in ImPACT and WMT results over time. Results: The ICC values for group 1 ranged from 0.26 to 0.88 for the 4 ImPACT composite scores. The ICC values for group 2 ranged from 0.37 to 0.76. In group 1, ImPACT classified 37.0% and 46.0% of healthy participants as impaired at time points 2 and 3, respectively. In group 2, ImPACT classified 22.2% and 28.9% of healthy participants as impaired at time points 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusions: We found variable test-retest reliability for ImPACT metrics. Visual motor speed and reaction time demonstrated greater reliability than verbal and visual memory. Our current data support a multifaceted approach to concussion assessment using clinical examinations, symptom reports, cognitive testing, and balance assessment.},
keywords = {ANALYSIS of variance, Body Weights and Measures, Cognition -- Evaluation, college, Computer Assisted, Continuing (Credit), Cross Sectional Studies, Data Analysis Software, DESCRIPTIVE statistics, DIAGNOSIS, Education, Effect Size, Female, human, Instrument Validation, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, Ireland, Male, Multicenter Studies, Neuropsychological Tests, ONE-way analysis of variance, Post Hoc Analysis, Repeated Measures, Scales, Students, test-retest reliability, UNITED States, Validation Studies, Young Adult},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}