Smith, A M; Stuart, M J; Dodick, D W; Roberts, W O; Alford, P W; Ashare, A B; Aubrey, M; Benson, B W; Burke, C J; Dick, R; Eickhoff, C; Emery, C A; Flashman, L A; Gaz, D; Giza, C C; Greenwald, R M; Herring, S; Hoshizaki, T B; Hudziak, J J; Huston 3rd, J; Krause, D; LaVoi, N; Leaf, M; Leddy, J J; MacPherson, A; McKee, A C; Mihalik, J P; Moessner, A M; Montelpare, W J; Putukian, M; Schneider, K J; Szalkowski, R; Tabrum, M; Whitehead, J; Wiese-Bjornstal, D M
Ice Hockey Summit II: zero tolerance for head hits and fighting.[Erratum appears in Clin J Sport Med. 2015 Jul;25(4):379] Journal Article
In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 78–87, 2015.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Brain Concussion/pc [Prevention & Control], *Brain Injury, *Hockey/in [Injuries], *Violence/pc [Prevention & Control], Adolescent, adult, Brain Concussion/th [Therapy], Brain Injury, Child, Chronic/pc [Prevention & Control], Chronic/th [Therapy], Congresses as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Head Protective Devices/st [Standards], Hockey/st [Standards], Humans, policy, Young Adult
@article{Smith2015a,
title = {Ice Hockey Summit II: zero tolerance for head hits and fighting.[Erratum appears in Clin J Sport Med. 2015 Jul;25(4):379]},
author = {Smith, A M and Stuart, M J and Dodick, D W and Roberts, W O and Alford, P W and Ashare, A B and Aubrey, M and Benson, B W and Burke, C J and Dick, R and Eickhoff, C and Emery, C A and Flashman, L A and Gaz, D and Giza, C C and Greenwald, R M and Herring, S and Hoshizaki, T B and Hudziak, J J and {Huston 3rd}, J and Krause, D and LaVoi, N and Leaf, M and Leddy, J J and MacPherson, A and McKee, A C and Mihalik, J P and Moessner, A M and Montelpare, W J and Putukian, M and Schneider, K J and Szalkowski, R and Tabrum, M and Whitehead, J and Wiese-Bjornstal, D M},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine},
volume = {25},
number = {2},
pages = {78--87},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To present currently known basic science and on-ice influences of sport-related concussion (SRC) in hockey, building on the Ice Hockey Summit I action plan (2011) to reduce SRC. METHODS: The prior summit proceedings included an action plan intended to reduce SRC. As such, the proceedings from Summit I served as a point of departure, for the science and discussion held during Summit II (Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, October 2013). Summit II focused on (1) Basic Science of Concussions in Ice Hockey: Taking Science Forward; (2) Acute and Chronic Concussion Care: Making a Difference; (3) Preventing Concussions via Behavior, Rules, Education and Measuring Effectiveness; (4) Updates in Equipment: their Relationship to Industry Standards; and (5) Policies and Plans at State, National and Federal Levels to reduce SRC. Action strategies derived from the presentations and discussion described in these sectors were subsequently voted on for purposes of prioritization. The following proceedings include knowledge and research shared by invited faculty, many of whom are health care providers and clinical investigators. RESULTS: The Summit II evidence-based action plan emphasizes the rapidly evolving scientific content of hockey SRC. It includes the most highly prioritized strategies voted on for implementation to decrease concussion. CONCLUSIONS: The highest priority action items identified from the Summit includes the following: (1) eliminate head hits from all levels of ice hockey, (2) change body-checking policies, and (3) eliminate fighting in all amateur and professional hockey.},
keywords = {*Brain Concussion/pc [Prevention \& Control], *Brain Injury, *Hockey/in [Injuries], *Violence/pc [Prevention \& Control], Adolescent, adult, Brain Concussion/th [Therapy], Brain Injury, Child, Chronic/pc [Prevention \& Control], Chronic/th [Therapy], Congresses as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Head Protective Devices/st [Standards], Hockey/st [Standards], Humans, policy, Young Adult},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Logan, B W; Goldman, S; Zola, M; Mackey, A
Concussive brain injury in the military: September 2001 to the present Journal Article
In: Behav Sci Law, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 803–813, 2013.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Brain Concussion/th [Therapy], *Military Personnel/px [Psychology], 2003-2011, Afghan Campaign 2001-, Brain Concussion/co [Complications], Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], Brain Concussion/ep [Epidemiology], Evidence-Based Medicine, Humans, Iraq War, United States/ep [Epidemiology]
@article{Logan2013,
title = {Concussive brain injury in the military: September 2001 to the present},
author = {Logan, B W and Goldman, S and Zola, M and Mackey, A},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {Behav Sci Law},
volume = {31},
number = {6},
pages = {803--813},
abstract = {Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, 1,348,405 citizens have been deployed to combat in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), Operation New Dawn in Iraq, and Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan (OEF). During this same period 266,810 (20%) of these individuals have been diagnosed with a traumatic brain injury (TBI). The majority of these were Army soldiers, with 155,282 (58%) receiving the diagnosis. Mild TBI comprised 82% of the total, with the remainder being moderate to severe. Over this same period the Department of Defense (DoD) has invested $374.9 million to enhance access and quality of care services, including 57 TBI treatment centers in the combat theater and throughout the U.S. The Army's medical research division, the Medical Research and Material Command (MRMC), has invested an additional $700 million to TBI research during this time. The effort has faced a number of challenges, including limited human subject basic and translational research, limited epidemiological data on combat-related injuries, limited capacity and standards for data acquisition, and a lack of standardized evidenced-based protocols for treatment. All these areas have undergone significant growth and development, leading to the comprehensive system of care present today. A further challenge in this patient population has been the clinical co-morbidity of TBI, post-traumatic stress disorder, and chronic pain syndrome. The Army and the DoD have created treatment programs that are interdisciplinary in clinical approach, targeting particular neuropsychological domains of dysfunction rather than diagnostic category or etiology of injury. This article presents the history of this effort, the challenges to accurate and adequate diagnosis and care that remain, and the future of brain injury clinical and research efforts in the military. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley \& Sons, Ltd.},
keywords = {*Brain Concussion/th [Therapy], *Military Personnel/px [Psychology], 2003-2011, Afghan Campaign 2001-, Brain Concussion/co [Complications], Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], Brain Concussion/ep [Epidemiology], Evidence-Based Medicine, Humans, Iraq War, United States/ep [Epidemiology]},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Smith, A M; Stuart, M J; Dodick, D W; Roberts, W O; Alford, P W; Ashare, A B; Aubrey, M; Benson, B W; Burke, C J; Dick, R; Eickhoff, C; Emery, C A; Flashman, L A; Gaz, D; Giza, C C; Greenwald, R M; Herring, S; Hoshizaki, T B; Hudziak, J J; Huston 3rd, J; Krause, D; LaVoi, N; Leaf, M; Leddy, J J; MacPherson, A; McKee, A C; Mihalik, J P; Moessner, A M; Montelpare, W J; Putukian, M; Schneider, K J; Szalkowski, R; Tabrum, M; Whitehead, J; Wiese-Bjornstal, D M
Ice Hockey Summit II: zero tolerance for head hits and fighting.[Erratum appears in Clin J Sport Med. 2015 Jul;25(4):379] Journal Article
In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 78–87, 2015.
@article{Smith2015a,
title = {Ice Hockey Summit II: zero tolerance for head hits and fighting.[Erratum appears in Clin J Sport Med. 2015 Jul;25(4):379]},
author = {Smith, A M and Stuart, M J and Dodick, D W and Roberts, W O and Alford, P W and Ashare, A B and Aubrey, M and Benson, B W and Burke, C J and Dick, R and Eickhoff, C and Emery, C A and Flashman, L A and Gaz, D and Giza, C C and Greenwald, R M and Herring, S and Hoshizaki, T B and Hudziak, J J and {Huston 3rd}, J and Krause, D and LaVoi, N and Leaf, M and Leddy, J J and MacPherson, A and McKee, A C and Mihalik, J P and Moessner, A M and Montelpare, W J and Putukian, M and Schneider, K J and Szalkowski, R and Tabrum, M and Whitehead, J and Wiese-Bjornstal, D M},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine},
volume = {25},
number = {2},
pages = {78--87},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To present currently known basic science and on-ice influences of sport-related concussion (SRC) in hockey, building on the Ice Hockey Summit I action plan (2011) to reduce SRC. METHODS: The prior summit proceedings included an action plan intended to reduce SRC. As such, the proceedings from Summit I served as a point of departure, for the science and discussion held during Summit II (Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, October 2013). Summit II focused on (1) Basic Science of Concussions in Ice Hockey: Taking Science Forward; (2) Acute and Chronic Concussion Care: Making a Difference; (3) Preventing Concussions via Behavior, Rules, Education and Measuring Effectiveness; (4) Updates in Equipment: their Relationship to Industry Standards; and (5) Policies and Plans at State, National and Federal Levels to reduce SRC. Action strategies derived from the presentations and discussion described in these sectors were subsequently voted on for purposes of prioritization. The following proceedings include knowledge and research shared by invited faculty, many of whom are health care providers and clinical investigators. RESULTS: The Summit II evidence-based action plan emphasizes the rapidly evolving scientific content of hockey SRC. It includes the most highly prioritized strategies voted on for implementation to decrease concussion. CONCLUSIONS: The highest priority action items identified from the Summit includes the following: (1) eliminate head hits from all levels of ice hockey, (2) change body-checking policies, and (3) eliminate fighting in all amateur and professional hockey.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Logan, B W; Goldman, S; Zola, M; Mackey, A
Concussive brain injury in the military: September 2001 to the present Journal Article
In: Behav Sci Law, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 803–813, 2013.
@article{Logan2013,
title = {Concussive brain injury in the military: September 2001 to the present},
author = {Logan, B W and Goldman, S and Zola, M and Mackey, A},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {Behav Sci Law},
volume = {31},
number = {6},
pages = {803--813},
abstract = {Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, 1,348,405 citizens have been deployed to combat in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), Operation New Dawn in Iraq, and Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan (OEF). During this same period 266,810 (20%) of these individuals have been diagnosed with a traumatic brain injury (TBI). The majority of these were Army soldiers, with 155,282 (58%) receiving the diagnosis. Mild TBI comprised 82% of the total, with the remainder being moderate to severe. Over this same period the Department of Defense (DoD) has invested $374.9 million to enhance access and quality of care services, including 57 TBI treatment centers in the combat theater and throughout the U.S. The Army's medical research division, the Medical Research and Material Command (MRMC), has invested an additional $700 million to TBI research during this time. The effort has faced a number of challenges, including limited human subject basic and translational research, limited epidemiological data on combat-related injuries, limited capacity and standards for data acquisition, and a lack of standardized evidenced-based protocols for treatment. All these areas have undergone significant growth and development, leading to the comprehensive system of care present today. A further challenge in this patient population has been the clinical co-morbidity of TBI, post-traumatic stress disorder, and chronic pain syndrome. The Army and the DoD have created treatment programs that are interdisciplinary in clinical approach, targeting particular neuropsychological domains of dysfunction rather than diagnostic category or etiology of injury. This article presents the history of this effort, the challenges to accurate and adequate diagnosis and care that remain, and the future of brain injury clinical and research efforts in the military. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley \& Sons, Ltd.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Smith, A M; Stuart, M J; Dodick, D W; Roberts, W O; Alford, P W; Ashare, A B; Aubrey, M; Benson, B W; Burke, C J; Dick, R; Eickhoff, C; Emery, C A; Flashman, L A; Gaz, D; Giza, C C; Greenwald, R M; Herring, S; Hoshizaki, T B; Hudziak, J J; Huston 3rd, J; Krause, D; LaVoi, N; Leaf, M; Leddy, J J; MacPherson, A; McKee, A C; Mihalik, J P; Moessner, A M; Montelpare, W J; Putukian, M; Schneider, K J; Szalkowski, R; Tabrum, M; Whitehead, J; Wiese-Bjornstal, D M
Ice Hockey Summit II: zero tolerance for head hits and fighting.[Erratum appears in Clin J Sport Med. 2015 Jul;25(4):379] Journal Article
In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 78–87, 2015.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Brain Concussion/pc [Prevention & Control], *Brain Injury, *Hockey/in [Injuries], *Violence/pc [Prevention & Control], Adolescent, adult, Brain Concussion/th [Therapy], Brain Injury, Child, Chronic/pc [Prevention & Control], Chronic/th [Therapy], Congresses as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Head Protective Devices/st [Standards], Hockey/st [Standards], Humans, policy, Young Adult
@article{Smith2015a,
title = {Ice Hockey Summit II: zero tolerance for head hits and fighting.[Erratum appears in Clin J Sport Med. 2015 Jul;25(4):379]},
author = {Smith, A M and Stuart, M J and Dodick, D W and Roberts, W O and Alford, P W and Ashare, A B and Aubrey, M and Benson, B W and Burke, C J and Dick, R and Eickhoff, C and Emery, C A and Flashman, L A and Gaz, D and Giza, C C and Greenwald, R M and Herring, S and Hoshizaki, T B and Hudziak, J J and {Huston 3rd}, J and Krause, D and LaVoi, N and Leaf, M and Leddy, J J and MacPherson, A and McKee, A C and Mihalik, J P and Moessner, A M and Montelpare, W J and Putukian, M and Schneider, K J and Szalkowski, R and Tabrum, M and Whitehead, J and Wiese-Bjornstal, D M},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine},
volume = {25},
number = {2},
pages = {78--87},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To present currently known basic science and on-ice influences of sport-related concussion (SRC) in hockey, building on the Ice Hockey Summit I action plan (2011) to reduce SRC. METHODS: The prior summit proceedings included an action plan intended to reduce SRC. As such, the proceedings from Summit I served as a point of departure, for the science and discussion held during Summit II (Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, October 2013). Summit II focused on (1) Basic Science of Concussions in Ice Hockey: Taking Science Forward; (2) Acute and Chronic Concussion Care: Making a Difference; (3) Preventing Concussions via Behavior, Rules, Education and Measuring Effectiveness; (4) Updates in Equipment: their Relationship to Industry Standards; and (5) Policies and Plans at State, National and Federal Levels to reduce SRC. Action strategies derived from the presentations and discussion described in these sectors were subsequently voted on for purposes of prioritization. The following proceedings include knowledge and research shared by invited faculty, many of whom are health care providers and clinical investigators. RESULTS: The Summit II evidence-based action plan emphasizes the rapidly evolving scientific content of hockey SRC. It includes the most highly prioritized strategies voted on for implementation to decrease concussion. CONCLUSIONS: The highest priority action items identified from the Summit includes the following: (1) eliminate head hits from all levels of ice hockey, (2) change body-checking policies, and (3) eliminate fighting in all amateur and professional hockey.},
keywords = {*Brain Concussion/pc [Prevention \& Control], *Brain Injury, *Hockey/in [Injuries], *Violence/pc [Prevention \& Control], Adolescent, adult, Brain Concussion/th [Therapy], Brain Injury, Child, Chronic/pc [Prevention \& Control], Chronic/th [Therapy], Congresses as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Head Protective Devices/st [Standards], Hockey/st [Standards], Humans, policy, Young Adult},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Logan, B W; Goldman, S; Zola, M; Mackey, A
Concussive brain injury in the military: September 2001 to the present Journal Article
In: Behav Sci Law, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 803–813, 2013.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Brain Concussion/th [Therapy], *Military Personnel/px [Psychology], 2003-2011, Afghan Campaign 2001-, Brain Concussion/co [Complications], Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], Brain Concussion/ep [Epidemiology], Evidence-Based Medicine, Humans, Iraq War, United States/ep [Epidemiology]
@article{Logan2013,
title = {Concussive brain injury in the military: September 2001 to the present},
author = {Logan, B W and Goldman, S and Zola, M and Mackey, A},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {Behav Sci Law},
volume = {31},
number = {6},
pages = {803--813},
abstract = {Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, 1,348,405 citizens have been deployed to combat in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), Operation New Dawn in Iraq, and Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan (OEF). During this same period 266,810 (20%) of these individuals have been diagnosed with a traumatic brain injury (TBI). The majority of these were Army soldiers, with 155,282 (58%) receiving the diagnosis. Mild TBI comprised 82% of the total, with the remainder being moderate to severe. Over this same period the Department of Defense (DoD) has invested $374.9 million to enhance access and quality of care services, including 57 TBI treatment centers in the combat theater and throughout the U.S. The Army's medical research division, the Medical Research and Material Command (MRMC), has invested an additional $700 million to TBI research during this time. The effort has faced a number of challenges, including limited human subject basic and translational research, limited epidemiological data on combat-related injuries, limited capacity and standards for data acquisition, and a lack of standardized evidenced-based protocols for treatment. All these areas have undergone significant growth and development, leading to the comprehensive system of care present today. A further challenge in this patient population has been the clinical co-morbidity of TBI, post-traumatic stress disorder, and chronic pain syndrome. The Army and the DoD have created treatment programs that are interdisciplinary in clinical approach, targeting particular neuropsychological domains of dysfunction rather than diagnostic category or etiology of injury. This article presents the history of this effort, the challenges to accurate and adequate diagnosis and care that remain, and the future of brain injury clinical and research efforts in the military. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley \& Sons, Ltd.},
keywords = {*Brain Concussion/th [Therapy], *Military Personnel/px [Psychology], 2003-2011, Afghan Campaign 2001-, Brain Concussion/co [Complications], Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], Brain Concussion/ep [Epidemiology], Evidence-Based Medicine, Humans, Iraq War, United States/ep [Epidemiology]},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}