Timpka, T; Jacobsson, J; Ekberg, J; Finch, C F; Bichenbach, J; Edouard, P; Bargoria, V; Branco, P; Alonso, J M
In: Journal of Science & Medicine in Sport, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 643–650, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: accident, athletic performance, clinical examination, competition, Concussion, Consensus, Epidemiologic Methods, epidemiological data, EPIDEMIOLOGY, football, head injury, health service, human, Humans, information processing, Injuries, Medline, meta analysis, METHODOLOGY, musculoskeletal disease, neck injury, nomenclature, Overuse injuries, physical education, procedures, Qualitative methods, Research Design, Review, self report, sport injury, Sports epidemiology, sports injury, SPORTS medicine, Systematic Review, tennis, Terminology, Terminology as Topic, track and field, training
@article{Timpka2015,
title = {Meta-narrative analysis of sports injury reporting practices based on the Injury Definitions Concept Framework (IDCF): A review of consensus statements and epidemiological studies in athletics (track and field)},
author = {Timpka, T and Jacobsson, J and Ekberg, J and Finch, C F and Bichenbach, J and Edouard, P and Bargoria, V and Branco, P and Alonso, J M},
doi = {10.1016/j.jsams.2014.11.393},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Science \& Medicine in Sport},
volume = {18},
number = {6},
pages = {643--650},
abstract = {Objectives: Consistency in routines for reporting injury has been a focus of development efforts in sports epidemiology for a long time. To gain an improved understanding of current reporting practices, we applied the Injury Definitions Concept Framework (IDCF) in a review of injury reporting in a subset of the field. Design: Meta-narrative review. Methods: An analysis of injury definitions reported in consensus statements for different sports and studies of injury epidemiology in athletics (track and field) published in PubMed between 1980 and 2013 was performed. Separate narratives for each of the three reporting contexts in the IDCF were constructed from the data. Results: Six consensus statements and 14 studies reporting on athletics injury epidemiology fulfilled the selection criteria. The narratives on sports performance, clinical examination, and athlete self-report contexts were evenly represented in the eligible studies. The sports performance and athlete self-report narratives covered both professional and community athletes as well as training and competition settings. In the clinical examination narrative, data collection by health service professionals was linked to studies of professional athletes at international championships. Conclusions: From an application of the IDCF in a review of injury reporting in sports epidemiology we observed a parallel usage of reporting contexts in this field of research. The co-existence of reporting methodologies does not necessarily reflect a problematic situation, but only provided that firm precautions are taken when comparing studies performed in the different contexts. © 2014 Sports Medicine Australia.},
keywords = {accident, athletic performance, clinical examination, competition, Concussion, Consensus, Epidemiologic Methods, epidemiological data, EPIDEMIOLOGY, football, head injury, health service, human, Humans, information processing, Injuries, Medline, meta analysis, METHODOLOGY, musculoskeletal disease, neck injury, nomenclature, Overuse injuries, physical education, procedures, Qualitative methods, Research Design, Review, self report, sport injury, Sports epidemiology, sports injury, SPORTS medicine, Systematic Review, tennis, Terminology, Terminology as Topic, track and field, training},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Lachapelle, Julie; Bolduc-Teasdale, Julie; Ptito, Alain; McKerral, Michelle
Deficits in complex visual information processing after mild TBI: Electrophysiological markers and vocational outcome prognosis Journal Article
In: Brain Injury, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 265–274, 2008, ISBN: 0269-9052 1362-301X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: 2008, Cognitive Processes, electrophysiological markers, Electrophysiology, information processing, Injuries, mild traumatic brain injury, Prognosis, Severity (Disorders), traumatic brain injury, visual information, Visual Perception, Vocational Evaluation, vocational outcomes
@article{Lachapelle2008,
title = {Deficits in complex visual information processing after mild TBI: Electrophysiological markers and vocational outcome prognosis},
author = {Lachapelle, Julie and Bolduc-Teasdale, Julie and Ptito, Alain and McKerral, Michelle},
doi = {10.1080/02699050801938983},
isbn = {0269-9052
1362-301X},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-01-01},
journal = {Brain Injury},
volume = {22},
number = {3},
pages = {265--274},
publisher = {Informa Healthcare},
address = {US},
abstract = {Primary objective: To evaluate low-level to complex information processing using visual electrophysiology and to examine the latter's prognostic value in regards to vocational outcome in persons having sustained a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Research design/methods: Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to pattern-reversal, simple motion, texture segregation and cognitive oddball paradigms from 17 participants with symptomatic mTBI at onset of specialized clinical intervention and from 15 normal controls. The relationship between abnormal electrophysiology and post-intervention return to work status was also examined. Main outcomes and results: Participants with mTBI showed a statistically significant (p \< .05) amplitude reduction for cognitive ERPs and delayed latencies for texture (p \< .05) and cognitive paradigms (p \< .005) compared to controls. Furthermore, participants with mTBI presenting texture or cognitive ERP latency delays upon admission were at significantly (p \< .01) greater risk of negative vocational outcome than mTBI participants with normal electrophysiology. Conclusions: The findings suggest that individuals with symptomatic mTBI can present selective deficits in complex visual information processing that could interfere with vocational outcome. ERP paradigms such as those employed in this study thus show potential for evaluating outcome prognosis and merit further study. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)},
keywords = {2008, Cognitive Processes, electrophysiological markers, Electrophysiology, information processing, Injuries, mild traumatic brain injury, Prognosis, Severity (Disorders), traumatic brain injury, visual information, Visual Perception, Vocational Evaluation, vocational outcomes},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bernstein, Daniel M
Information processing difficulty long after self-reported concussion Journal Article
In: Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 673–682, 2002, ISBN: 1355-6177 1469-7661.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: 2002, attention, attention tasks, brain concussion, Cognitive Ability, cognitive tasks, information processing, Mild head injury, self-report concussion
@article{Bernstein2002,
title = {Information processing difficulty long after self-reported concussion},
author = {Bernstein, Daniel M},
doi = {10.1017/S1355617702801400},
isbn = {1355-6177
1469-7661},
year = {2002},
date = {2002-01-01},
journal = {Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society},
volume = {8},
number = {5},
pages = {673--682},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {United Kingdom},
abstract = {The present study replicates and extends previous work in which university students with self-reported concussion demonstrated reduced P300 amplitude on a set of easy and difficult attention tasks, in addition to performing more poorly than controls on demanding cognitive tasks many years after injury. In the present study, 13 students with self-reported concussion (MHI group: M time since injury = 8 years) and 10 controls were matched for age, sex, education, and a variety of cognitive, physical and emotional complaints. Controls outperformed the MHI group on the Digit Symbol substitution task and on a difficult dual task involving tone discrimination and visual working memory. Additionally, controls exhibited larger P300 amplitudes on both an easy and a difficult auditory discrimination task. A combination of electrophysiological, neuropsychological and self-report indices predicted group membership (MHI vs. control) with 88% accuracy. The present results, coupled with previous work, offer preliminary evidence that the combination of event-related potentials and demanding behavioral measures might reveal long-lasting, subtle cognitive problems associated with MHI. These findings may challenge existing notions of complete recovery after MHI. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)},
keywords = {2002, attention, attention tasks, brain concussion, Cognitive Ability, cognitive tasks, information processing, Mild head injury, self-report concussion},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Timpka, T; Jacobsson, J; Ekberg, J; Finch, C F; Bichenbach, J; Edouard, P; Bargoria, V; Branco, P; Alonso, J M
In: Journal of Science & Medicine in Sport, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 643–650, 2015.
@article{Timpka2015,
title = {Meta-narrative analysis of sports injury reporting practices based on the Injury Definitions Concept Framework (IDCF): A review of consensus statements and epidemiological studies in athletics (track and field)},
author = {Timpka, T and Jacobsson, J and Ekberg, J and Finch, C F and Bichenbach, J and Edouard, P and Bargoria, V and Branco, P and Alonso, J M},
doi = {10.1016/j.jsams.2014.11.393},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Science \& Medicine in Sport},
volume = {18},
number = {6},
pages = {643--650},
abstract = {Objectives: Consistency in routines for reporting injury has been a focus of development efforts in sports epidemiology for a long time. To gain an improved understanding of current reporting practices, we applied the Injury Definitions Concept Framework (IDCF) in a review of injury reporting in a subset of the field. Design: Meta-narrative review. Methods: An analysis of injury definitions reported in consensus statements for different sports and studies of injury epidemiology in athletics (track and field) published in PubMed between 1980 and 2013 was performed. Separate narratives for each of the three reporting contexts in the IDCF were constructed from the data. Results: Six consensus statements and 14 studies reporting on athletics injury epidemiology fulfilled the selection criteria. The narratives on sports performance, clinical examination, and athlete self-report contexts were evenly represented in the eligible studies. The sports performance and athlete self-report narratives covered both professional and community athletes as well as training and competition settings. In the clinical examination narrative, data collection by health service professionals was linked to studies of professional athletes at international championships. Conclusions: From an application of the IDCF in a review of injury reporting in sports epidemiology we observed a parallel usage of reporting contexts in this field of research. The co-existence of reporting methodologies does not necessarily reflect a problematic situation, but only provided that firm precautions are taken when comparing studies performed in the different contexts. © 2014 Sports Medicine Australia.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Lachapelle, Julie; Bolduc-Teasdale, Julie; Ptito, Alain; McKerral, Michelle
Deficits in complex visual information processing after mild TBI: Electrophysiological markers and vocational outcome prognosis Journal Article
In: Brain Injury, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 265–274, 2008, ISBN: 0269-9052 1362-301X.
@article{Lachapelle2008,
title = {Deficits in complex visual information processing after mild TBI: Electrophysiological markers and vocational outcome prognosis},
author = {Lachapelle, Julie and Bolduc-Teasdale, Julie and Ptito, Alain and McKerral, Michelle},
doi = {10.1080/02699050801938983},
isbn = {0269-9052
1362-301X},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-01-01},
journal = {Brain Injury},
volume = {22},
number = {3},
pages = {265--274},
publisher = {Informa Healthcare},
address = {US},
abstract = {Primary objective: To evaluate low-level to complex information processing using visual electrophysiology and to examine the latter's prognostic value in regards to vocational outcome in persons having sustained a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Research design/methods: Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to pattern-reversal, simple motion, texture segregation and cognitive oddball paradigms from 17 participants with symptomatic mTBI at onset of specialized clinical intervention and from 15 normal controls. The relationship between abnormal electrophysiology and post-intervention return to work status was also examined. Main outcomes and results: Participants with mTBI showed a statistically significant (p \< .05) amplitude reduction for cognitive ERPs and delayed latencies for texture (p \< .05) and cognitive paradigms (p \< .005) compared to controls. Furthermore, participants with mTBI presenting texture or cognitive ERP latency delays upon admission were at significantly (p \< .01) greater risk of negative vocational outcome than mTBI participants with normal electrophysiology. Conclusions: The findings suggest that individuals with symptomatic mTBI can present selective deficits in complex visual information processing that could interfere with vocational outcome. ERP paradigms such as those employed in this study thus show potential for evaluating outcome prognosis and merit further study. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bernstein, Daniel M
Information processing difficulty long after self-reported concussion Journal Article
In: Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 673–682, 2002, ISBN: 1355-6177 1469-7661.
@article{Bernstein2002,
title = {Information processing difficulty long after self-reported concussion},
author = {Bernstein, Daniel M},
doi = {10.1017/S1355617702801400},
isbn = {1355-6177
1469-7661},
year = {2002},
date = {2002-01-01},
journal = {Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society},
volume = {8},
number = {5},
pages = {673--682},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {United Kingdom},
abstract = {The present study replicates and extends previous work in which university students with self-reported concussion demonstrated reduced P300 amplitude on a set of easy and difficult attention tasks, in addition to performing more poorly than controls on demanding cognitive tasks many years after injury. In the present study, 13 students with self-reported concussion (MHI group: M time since injury = 8 years) and 10 controls were matched for age, sex, education, and a variety of cognitive, physical and emotional complaints. Controls outperformed the MHI group on the Digit Symbol substitution task and on a difficult dual task involving tone discrimination and visual working memory. Additionally, controls exhibited larger P300 amplitudes on both an easy and a difficult auditory discrimination task. A combination of electrophysiological, neuropsychological and self-report indices predicted group membership (MHI vs. control) with 88% accuracy. The present results, coupled with previous work, offer preliminary evidence that the combination of event-related potentials and demanding behavioral measures might reveal long-lasting, subtle cognitive problems associated with MHI. These findings may challenge existing notions of complete recovery after MHI. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Timpka, T; Jacobsson, J; Ekberg, J; Finch, C F; Bichenbach, J; Edouard, P; Bargoria, V; Branco, P; Alonso, J M
In: Journal of Science & Medicine in Sport, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 643–650, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: accident, athletic performance, clinical examination, competition, Concussion, Consensus, Epidemiologic Methods, epidemiological data, EPIDEMIOLOGY, football, head injury, health service, human, Humans, information processing, Injuries, Medline, meta analysis, METHODOLOGY, musculoskeletal disease, neck injury, nomenclature, Overuse injuries, physical education, procedures, Qualitative methods, Research Design, Review, self report, sport injury, Sports epidemiology, sports injury, SPORTS medicine, Systematic Review, tennis, Terminology, Terminology as Topic, track and field, training
@article{Timpka2015,
title = {Meta-narrative analysis of sports injury reporting practices based on the Injury Definitions Concept Framework (IDCF): A review of consensus statements and epidemiological studies in athletics (track and field)},
author = {Timpka, T and Jacobsson, J and Ekberg, J and Finch, C F and Bichenbach, J and Edouard, P and Bargoria, V and Branco, P and Alonso, J M},
doi = {10.1016/j.jsams.2014.11.393},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Science \& Medicine in Sport},
volume = {18},
number = {6},
pages = {643--650},
abstract = {Objectives: Consistency in routines for reporting injury has been a focus of development efforts in sports epidemiology for a long time. To gain an improved understanding of current reporting practices, we applied the Injury Definitions Concept Framework (IDCF) in a review of injury reporting in a subset of the field. Design: Meta-narrative review. Methods: An analysis of injury definitions reported in consensus statements for different sports and studies of injury epidemiology in athletics (track and field) published in PubMed between 1980 and 2013 was performed. Separate narratives for each of the three reporting contexts in the IDCF were constructed from the data. Results: Six consensus statements and 14 studies reporting on athletics injury epidemiology fulfilled the selection criteria. The narratives on sports performance, clinical examination, and athlete self-report contexts were evenly represented in the eligible studies. The sports performance and athlete self-report narratives covered both professional and community athletes as well as training and competition settings. In the clinical examination narrative, data collection by health service professionals was linked to studies of professional athletes at international championships. Conclusions: From an application of the IDCF in a review of injury reporting in sports epidemiology we observed a parallel usage of reporting contexts in this field of research. The co-existence of reporting methodologies does not necessarily reflect a problematic situation, but only provided that firm precautions are taken when comparing studies performed in the different contexts. © 2014 Sports Medicine Australia.},
keywords = {accident, athletic performance, clinical examination, competition, Concussion, Consensus, Epidemiologic Methods, epidemiological data, EPIDEMIOLOGY, football, head injury, health service, human, Humans, information processing, Injuries, Medline, meta analysis, METHODOLOGY, musculoskeletal disease, neck injury, nomenclature, Overuse injuries, physical education, procedures, Qualitative methods, Research Design, Review, self report, sport injury, Sports epidemiology, sports injury, SPORTS medicine, Systematic Review, tennis, Terminology, Terminology as Topic, track and field, training},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Lachapelle, Julie; Bolduc-Teasdale, Julie; Ptito, Alain; McKerral, Michelle
Deficits in complex visual information processing after mild TBI: Electrophysiological markers and vocational outcome prognosis Journal Article
In: Brain Injury, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 265–274, 2008, ISBN: 0269-9052 1362-301X.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: 2008, Cognitive Processes, electrophysiological markers, Electrophysiology, information processing, Injuries, mild traumatic brain injury, Prognosis, Severity (Disorders), traumatic brain injury, visual information, Visual Perception, Vocational Evaluation, vocational outcomes
@article{Lachapelle2008,
title = {Deficits in complex visual information processing after mild TBI: Electrophysiological markers and vocational outcome prognosis},
author = {Lachapelle, Julie and Bolduc-Teasdale, Julie and Ptito, Alain and McKerral, Michelle},
doi = {10.1080/02699050801938983},
isbn = {0269-9052
1362-301X},
year = {2008},
date = {2008-01-01},
journal = {Brain Injury},
volume = {22},
number = {3},
pages = {265--274},
publisher = {Informa Healthcare},
address = {US},
abstract = {Primary objective: To evaluate low-level to complex information processing using visual electrophysiology and to examine the latter's prognostic value in regards to vocational outcome in persons having sustained a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Research design/methods: Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to pattern-reversal, simple motion, texture segregation and cognitive oddball paradigms from 17 participants with symptomatic mTBI at onset of specialized clinical intervention and from 15 normal controls. The relationship between abnormal electrophysiology and post-intervention return to work status was also examined. Main outcomes and results: Participants with mTBI showed a statistically significant (p \< .05) amplitude reduction for cognitive ERPs and delayed latencies for texture (p \< .05) and cognitive paradigms (p \< .005) compared to controls. Furthermore, participants with mTBI presenting texture or cognitive ERP latency delays upon admission were at significantly (p \< .01) greater risk of negative vocational outcome than mTBI participants with normal electrophysiology. Conclusions: The findings suggest that individuals with symptomatic mTBI can present selective deficits in complex visual information processing that could interfere with vocational outcome. ERP paradigms such as those employed in this study thus show potential for evaluating outcome prognosis and merit further study. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)},
keywords = {2008, Cognitive Processes, electrophysiological markers, Electrophysiology, information processing, Injuries, mild traumatic brain injury, Prognosis, Severity (Disorders), traumatic brain injury, visual information, Visual Perception, Vocational Evaluation, vocational outcomes},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bernstein, Daniel M
Information processing difficulty long after self-reported concussion Journal Article
In: Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 673–682, 2002, ISBN: 1355-6177 1469-7661.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: 2002, attention, attention tasks, brain concussion, Cognitive Ability, cognitive tasks, information processing, Mild head injury, self-report concussion
@article{Bernstein2002,
title = {Information processing difficulty long after self-reported concussion},
author = {Bernstein, Daniel M},
doi = {10.1017/S1355617702801400},
isbn = {1355-6177
1469-7661},
year = {2002},
date = {2002-01-01},
journal = {Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society},
volume = {8},
number = {5},
pages = {673--682},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
address = {United Kingdom},
abstract = {The present study replicates and extends previous work in which university students with self-reported concussion demonstrated reduced P300 amplitude on a set of easy and difficult attention tasks, in addition to performing more poorly than controls on demanding cognitive tasks many years after injury. In the present study, 13 students with self-reported concussion (MHI group: M time since injury = 8 years) and 10 controls were matched for age, sex, education, and a variety of cognitive, physical and emotional complaints. Controls outperformed the MHI group on the Digit Symbol substitution task and on a difficult dual task involving tone discrimination and visual working memory. Additionally, controls exhibited larger P300 amplitudes on both an easy and a difficult auditory discrimination task. A combination of electrophysiological, neuropsychological and self-report indices predicted group membership (MHI vs. control) with 88% accuracy. The present results, coupled with previous work, offer preliminary evidence that the combination of event-related potentials and demanding behavioral measures might reveal long-lasting, subtle cognitive problems associated with MHI. These findings may challenge existing notions of complete recovery after MHI. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)},
keywords = {2002, attention, attention tasks, brain concussion, Cognitive Ability, cognitive tasks, information processing, Mild head injury, self-report concussion},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}