Dretsch, M; Bleiberg, J; Williams, K; Caban, J; Kelly, J; Grammer, G; DeGraba, T
Three Scoring Approaches to the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory for Measuring Clinical Change in Service Members Receiving Intensive Treatment for Combat-Related mTBI Journal Article
In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 2016.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], *Brain Injuries/rh [Rehabilitation], *Military Personnel, *Neuropsychological Tests, adult, ambulatory care, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, UNITED States, Warfare
@article{Dretsch2016,
title = {Three Scoring Approaches to the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory for Measuring Clinical Change in Service Members Receiving Intensive Treatment for Combat-Related mTBI},
author = {Dretsch, M and Bleiberg, J and Williams, K and Caban, J and Kelly, J and Grammer, G and DeGraba, T},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation},
volume = {31},
number = {1},
pages = {23--29},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory to measure clinical changes over time in a population of US service members undergoing treatment of mild traumatic brain injury and comorbid psychological health conditions. SETTING: A 4-week, 8-hour per day, intensive, outpatient, interdisciplinary, comprehensive treatment program at the National Intrepid Center of Excellence in Bethesda, Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred fourteen active-duty service members being treated for combat-related comorbid mild traumatic brain injury and psychological health conditions. DESIGN: Repeated-measures, retrospective analysis of a single-group using a pretest-posttest treatment design. MAIN MEASURES: Three Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory scoring methods: (1) a total summated score, (2) the 3-factor method, and (3) the 4-factor method (with and without orphan items). RESULTS: All 3 scoring methods yielded statistically significant within-subject changes between admission and discharge. The evaluation of effect sizes indicated that the 3 different Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory scoring methods were comparable. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that the different scoring methods all have potential for assessing clinical changes in symptoms for groups of patients undergoing treatment, with no clear advantage with any one method.},
keywords = {*Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], *Brain Injuries/rh [Rehabilitation], *Military Personnel, *Neuropsychological Tests, adult, ambulatory care, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, UNITED States, Warfare},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Anonymous,
Pocket CRT Journal Article
In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 267, 2013, ISBN: 1473-0480.
BibTeX | Tags: ambulatory care, Article, Assessment/Testing, brain concussion, human, injury scale, memory disorder, sport injury
@article{Anonymous2013a,
title = {Pocket CRT},
author = {Anonymous},
isbn = {1473-0480},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {British Journal of Sports Medicine},
volume = {47},
number = {5},
pages = {267},
keywords = {ambulatory care, Article, Assessment/Testing, brain concussion, human, injury scale, memory disorder, sport injury},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Dretsch, M; Bleiberg, J; Williams, K; Caban, J; Kelly, J; Grammer, G; DeGraba, T
Three Scoring Approaches to the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory for Measuring Clinical Change in Service Members Receiving Intensive Treatment for Combat-Related mTBI Journal Article
In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 2016.
@article{Dretsch2016,
title = {Three Scoring Approaches to the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory for Measuring Clinical Change in Service Members Receiving Intensive Treatment for Combat-Related mTBI},
author = {Dretsch, M and Bleiberg, J and Williams, K and Caban, J and Kelly, J and Grammer, G and DeGraba, T},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation},
volume = {31},
number = {1},
pages = {23--29},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory to measure clinical changes over time in a population of US service members undergoing treatment of mild traumatic brain injury and comorbid psychological health conditions. SETTING: A 4-week, 8-hour per day, intensive, outpatient, interdisciplinary, comprehensive treatment program at the National Intrepid Center of Excellence in Bethesda, Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred fourteen active-duty service members being treated for combat-related comorbid mild traumatic brain injury and psychological health conditions. DESIGN: Repeated-measures, retrospective analysis of a single-group using a pretest-posttest treatment design. MAIN MEASURES: Three Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory scoring methods: (1) a total summated score, (2) the 3-factor method, and (3) the 4-factor method (with and without orphan items). RESULTS: All 3 scoring methods yielded statistically significant within-subject changes between admission and discharge. The evaluation of effect sizes indicated that the 3 different Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory scoring methods were comparable. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that the different scoring methods all have potential for assessing clinical changes in symptoms for groups of patients undergoing treatment, with no clear advantage with any one method.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Anonymous,
Pocket CRT Journal Article
In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 267, 2013, ISBN: 1473-0480.
@article{Anonymous2013a,
title = {Pocket CRT},
author = {Anonymous},
isbn = {1473-0480},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {British Journal of Sports Medicine},
volume = {47},
number = {5},
pages = {267},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Dretsch, M; Bleiberg, J; Williams, K; Caban, J; Kelly, J; Grammer, G; DeGraba, T
Three Scoring Approaches to the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory for Measuring Clinical Change in Service Members Receiving Intensive Treatment for Combat-Related mTBI Journal Article
In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 2016.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], *Brain Injuries/rh [Rehabilitation], *Military Personnel, *Neuropsychological Tests, adult, ambulatory care, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, UNITED States, Warfare
@article{Dretsch2016,
title = {Three Scoring Approaches to the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory for Measuring Clinical Change in Service Members Receiving Intensive Treatment for Combat-Related mTBI},
author = {Dretsch, M and Bleiberg, J and Williams, K and Caban, J and Kelly, J and Grammer, G and DeGraba, T},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation},
volume = {31},
number = {1},
pages = {23--29},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory to measure clinical changes over time in a population of US service members undergoing treatment of mild traumatic brain injury and comorbid psychological health conditions. SETTING: A 4-week, 8-hour per day, intensive, outpatient, interdisciplinary, comprehensive treatment program at the National Intrepid Center of Excellence in Bethesda, Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred fourteen active-duty service members being treated for combat-related comorbid mild traumatic brain injury and psychological health conditions. DESIGN: Repeated-measures, retrospective analysis of a single-group using a pretest-posttest treatment design. MAIN MEASURES: Three Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory scoring methods: (1) a total summated score, (2) the 3-factor method, and (3) the 4-factor method (with and without orphan items). RESULTS: All 3 scoring methods yielded statistically significant within-subject changes between admission and discharge. The evaluation of effect sizes indicated that the 3 different Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory scoring methods were comparable. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that the different scoring methods all have potential for assessing clinical changes in symptoms for groups of patients undergoing treatment, with no clear advantage with any one method.},
keywords = {*Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], *Brain Injuries/rh [Rehabilitation], *Military Personnel, *Neuropsychological Tests, adult, ambulatory care, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, UNITED States, Warfare},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Anonymous,
Pocket CRT Journal Article
In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 267, 2013, ISBN: 1473-0480.
BibTeX | Tags: ambulatory care, Article, Assessment/Testing, brain concussion, human, injury scale, memory disorder, sport injury
@article{Anonymous2013a,
title = {Pocket CRT},
author = {Anonymous},
isbn = {1473-0480},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {British Journal of Sports Medicine},
volume = {47},
number = {5},
pages = {267},
keywords = {ambulatory care, Article, Assessment/Testing, brain concussion, human, injury scale, memory disorder, sport injury},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}