Bailie, J M; Kennedy, J E; French, L M; Marshall, K; Prokhorenko, O; Asmussen, S; Reid, M W; Qashu, F; Brickell, T A; Lange, R T
Profile Analysis of the Neurobehavioral and Psychiatric Symptoms Following Combat-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Identification of Subtypes Journal Article
In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–12, 2016.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Brain Injuries/co [Complications], *Military Personnel, Abbreviated Injury Scale, Adolescent, adult, Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], Cluster Analysis, Cognition Disorders/et [Etiology], Cognition Disorders/px [Psychology], FACTOR analysis, Headache/et [Etiology], Headache/px [Psychology], Humans, Male, middle aged, Mood Disorders/et [Etiology], Mood Disorders/px [Psychology], Neuropsychological Tests, Post-Traumatic/et [Etiology], Post-Traumatic/px [Psychology], Statistical, Stress Disorders, UNITED States, Warfare, Young Adult
@article{Bailie2016,
title = {Profile Analysis of the Neurobehavioral and Psychiatric Symptoms Following Combat-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Identification of Subtypes},
author = {Bailie, J M and Kennedy, J E and French, L M and Marshall, K and Prokhorenko, O and Asmussen, S and Reid, M W and Qashu, F and Brickell, T A and Lange, R T},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation},
volume = {31},
number = {1},
pages = {2--12},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To explore the taxonomy of combat-related mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) based on symptom patterns. PARTICIPANTS: Up to 1341 military personnel who experienced a combat-related mTBI within 2 years of evaluation. MEASURES: Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory and PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C). RESULTS: Cluster analysis revealed the following 4 subtypes: primarily psychiatric (posttraumatic stress disorder) group, a cognitive group, a mixed symptom group, and a good recovery group. The posttraumatic stress disorder cluster (21.9% of the sample) reported symptoms related to hyperarousal and dissociation/depression with few complaints related to cognition or headaches. The cognitive group (21.5% of the sample) had primarily cognitive and headache complaints with few mood symptoms. The mixed profile cluster included 18.6% of the sample and was characterized by a combination of mood complaints (hyperarousal and dissociation/depression), cognitive complaints, and headaches. The largest cluster (37.8% of the sample) had an overall low symptom profile and was labeled the "good recovery" group. CONCLUSIONS: The results support a unique taxonomy for combat-related mTBI. The clinical differences among these subtypes indicate a need for unique treatment resources and programs.},
keywords = {*Brain Injuries/co [Complications], *Military Personnel, Abbreviated Injury Scale, Adolescent, adult, Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], Cluster Analysis, Cognition Disorders/et [Etiology], Cognition Disorders/px [Psychology], FACTOR analysis, Headache/et [Etiology], Headache/px [Psychology], Humans, Male, middle aged, Mood Disorders/et [Etiology], Mood Disorders/px [Psychology], Neuropsychological Tests, Post-Traumatic/et [Etiology], Post-Traumatic/px [Psychology], Statistical, Stress Disorders, UNITED States, Warfare, Young Adult},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Dretsch, M; Bleiberg, J; Williams, K; Caban, J; Kelly, J; Grammer, G; DeGraba, T
Three Scoring Approaches to the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory for Measuring Clinical Change in Service Members Receiving Intensive Treatment for Combat-Related mTBI Journal Article
In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 2016.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], *Brain Injuries/rh [Rehabilitation], *Military Personnel, *Neuropsychological Tests, adult, ambulatory care, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, UNITED States, Warfare
@article{Dretsch2016,
title = {Three Scoring Approaches to the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory for Measuring Clinical Change in Service Members Receiving Intensive Treatment for Combat-Related mTBI},
author = {Dretsch, M and Bleiberg, J and Williams, K and Caban, J and Kelly, J and Grammer, G and DeGraba, T},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation},
volume = {31},
number = {1},
pages = {23--29},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory to measure clinical changes over time in a population of US service members undergoing treatment of mild traumatic brain injury and comorbid psychological health conditions. SETTING: A 4-week, 8-hour per day, intensive, outpatient, interdisciplinary, comprehensive treatment program at the National Intrepid Center of Excellence in Bethesda, Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred fourteen active-duty service members being treated for combat-related comorbid mild traumatic brain injury and psychological health conditions. DESIGN: Repeated-measures, retrospective analysis of a single-group using a pretest-posttest treatment design. MAIN MEASURES: Three Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory scoring methods: (1) a total summated score, (2) the 3-factor method, and (3) the 4-factor method (with and without orphan items). RESULTS: All 3 scoring methods yielded statistically significant within-subject changes between admission and discharge. The evaluation of effect sizes indicated that the 3 different Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory scoring methods were comparable. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that the different scoring methods all have potential for assessing clinical changes in symptoms for groups of patients undergoing treatment, with no clear advantage with any one method.},
keywords = {*Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], *Brain Injuries/rh [Rehabilitation], *Military Personnel, *Neuropsychological Tests, adult, ambulatory care, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, UNITED States, Warfare},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bailie, J M; Kennedy, J E; French, L M; Marshall, K; Prokhorenko, O; Asmussen, S; Reid, M W; Qashu, F; Brickell, T A; Lange, R T
Profile Analysis of the Neurobehavioral and Psychiatric Symptoms Following Combat-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Identification of Subtypes Journal Article
In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–12, 2016.
@article{Bailie2016,
title = {Profile Analysis of the Neurobehavioral and Psychiatric Symptoms Following Combat-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Identification of Subtypes},
author = {Bailie, J M and Kennedy, J E and French, L M and Marshall, K and Prokhorenko, O and Asmussen, S and Reid, M W and Qashu, F and Brickell, T A and Lange, R T},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation},
volume = {31},
number = {1},
pages = {2--12},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To explore the taxonomy of combat-related mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) based on symptom patterns. PARTICIPANTS: Up to 1341 military personnel who experienced a combat-related mTBI within 2 years of evaluation. MEASURES: Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory and PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C). RESULTS: Cluster analysis revealed the following 4 subtypes: primarily psychiatric (posttraumatic stress disorder) group, a cognitive group, a mixed symptom group, and a good recovery group. The posttraumatic stress disorder cluster (21.9% of the sample) reported symptoms related to hyperarousal and dissociation/depression with few complaints related to cognition or headaches. The cognitive group (21.5% of the sample) had primarily cognitive and headache complaints with few mood symptoms. The mixed profile cluster included 18.6% of the sample and was characterized by a combination of mood complaints (hyperarousal and dissociation/depression), cognitive complaints, and headaches. The largest cluster (37.8% of the sample) had an overall low symptom profile and was labeled the "good recovery" group. CONCLUSIONS: The results support a unique taxonomy for combat-related mTBI. The clinical differences among these subtypes indicate a need for unique treatment resources and programs.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Dretsch, M; Bleiberg, J; Williams, K; Caban, J; Kelly, J; Grammer, G; DeGraba, T
Three Scoring Approaches to the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory for Measuring Clinical Change in Service Members Receiving Intensive Treatment for Combat-Related mTBI Journal Article
In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 2016.
@article{Dretsch2016,
title = {Three Scoring Approaches to the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory for Measuring Clinical Change in Service Members Receiving Intensive Treatment for Combat-Related mTBI},
author = {Dretsch, M and Bleiberg, J and Williams, K and Caban, J and Kelly, J and Grammer, G and DeGraba, T},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation},
volume = {31},
number = {1},
pages = {23--29},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory to measure clinical changes over time in a population of US service members undergoing treatment of mild traumatic brain injury and comorbid psychological health conditions. SETTING: A 4-week, 8-hour per day, intensive, outpatient, interdisciplinary, comprehensive treatment program at the National Intrepid Center of Excellence in Bethesda, Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred fourteen active-duty service members being treated for combat-related comorbid mild traumatic brain injury and psychological health conditions. DESIGN: Repeated-measures, retrospective analysis of a single-group using a pretest-posttest treatment design. MAIN MEASURES: Three Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory scoring methods: (1) a total summated score, (2) the 3-factor method, and (3) the 4-factor method (with and without orphan items). RESULTS: All 3 scoring methods yielded statistically significant within-subject changes between admission and discharge. The evaluation of effect sizes indicated that the 3 different Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory scoring methods were comparable. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that the different scoring methods all have potential for assessing clinical changes in symptoms for groups of patients undergoing treatment, with no clear advantage with any one method.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Bailie, J M; Kennedy, J E; French, L M; Marshall, K; Prokhorenko, O; Asmussen, S; Reid, M W; Qashu, F; Brickell, T A; Lange, R T
Profile Analysis of the Neurobehavioral and Psychiatric Symptoms Following Combat-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Identification of Subtypes Journal Article
In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–12, 2016.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Brain Injuries/co [Complications], *Military Personnel, Abbreviated Injury Scale, Adolescent, adult, Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], Cluster Analysis, Cognition Disorders/et [Etiology], Cognition Disorders/px [Psychology], FACTOR analysis, Headache/et [Etiology], Headache/px [Psychology], Humans, Male, middle aged, Mood Disorders/et [Etiology], Mood Disorders/px [Psychology], Neuropsychological Tests, Post-Traumatic/et [Etiology], Post-Traumatic/px [Psychology], Statistical, Stress Disorders, UNITED States, Warfare, Young Adult
@article{Bailie2016,
title = {Profile Analysis of the Neurobehavioral and Psychiatric Symptoms Following Combat-Related Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Identification of Subtypes},
author = {Bailie, J M and Kennedy, J E and French, L M and Marshall, K and Prokhorenko, O and Asmussen, S and Reid, M W and Qashu, F and Brickell, T A and Lange, R T},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation},
volume = {31},
number = {1},
pages = {2--12},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To explore the taxonomy of combat-related mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) based on symptom patterns. PARTICIPANTS: Up to 1341 military personnel who experienced a combat-related mTBI within 2 years of evaluation. MEASURES: Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory and PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C). RESULTS: Cluster analysis revealed the following 4 subtypes: primarily psychiatric (posttraumatic stress disorder) group, a cognitive group, a mixed symptom group, and a good recovery group. The posttraumatic stress disorder cluster (21.9% of the sample) reported symptoms related to hyperarousal and dissociation/depression with few complaints related to cognition or headaches. The cognitive group (21.5% of the sample) had primarily cognitive and headache complaints with few mood symptoms. The mixed profile cluster included 18.6% of the sample and was characterized by a combination of mood complaints (hyperarousal and dissociation/depression), cognitive complaints, and headaches. The largest cluster (37.8% of the sample) had an overall low symptom profile and was labeled the "good recovery" group. CONCLUSIONS: The results support a unique taxonomy for combat-related mTBI. The clinical differences among these subtypes indicate a need for unique treatment resources and programs.},
keywords = {*Brain Injuries/co [Complications], *Military Personnel, Abbreviated Injury Scale, Adolescent, adult, Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], Cluster Analysis, Cognition Disorders/et [Etiology], Cognition Disorders/px [Psychology], FACTOR analysis, Headache/et [Etiology], Headache/px [Psychology], Humans, Male, middle aged, Mood Disorders/et [Etiology], Mood Disorders/px [Psychology], Neuropsychological Tests, Post-Traumatic/et [Etiology], Post-Traumatic/px [Psychology], Statistical, Stress Disorders, UNITED States, Warfare, Young Adult},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Dretsch, M; Bleiberg, J; Williams, K; Caban, J; Kelly, J; Grammer, G; DeGraba, T
Three Scoring Approaches to the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory for Measuring Clinical Change in Service Members Receiving Intensive Treatment for Combat-Related mTBI Journal Article
In: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 2016.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], *Brain Injuries/rh [Rehabilitation], *Military Personnel, *Neuropsychological Tests, adult, ambulatory care, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, UNITED States, Warfare
@article{Dretsch2016,
title = {Three Scoring Approaches to the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory for Measuring Clinical Change in Service Members Receiving Intensive Treatment for Combat-Related mTBI},
author = {Dretsch, M and Bleiberg, J and Williams, K and Caban, J and Kelly, J and Grammer, G and DeGraba, T},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation},
volume = {31},
number = {1},
pages = {23--29},
abstract = {OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory to measure clinical changes over time in a population of US service members undergoing treatment of mild traumatic brain injury and comorbid psychological health conditions. SETTING: A 4-week, 8-hour per day, intensive, outpatient, interdisciplinary, comprehensive treatment program at the National Intrepid Center of Excellence in Bethesda, Maryland. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred fourteen active-duty service members being treated for combat-related comorbid mild traumatic brain injury and psychological health conditions. DESIGN: Repeated-measures, retrospective analysis of a single-group using a pretest-posttest treatment design. MAIN MEASURES: Three Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory scoring methods: (1) a total summated score, (2) the 3-factor method, and (3) the 4-factor method (with and without orphan items). RESULTS: All 3 scoring methods yielded statistically significant within-subject changes between admission and discharge. The evaluation of effect sizes indicated that the 3 different Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory scoring methods were comparable. CONCLUSION: Findings indicate that the different scoring methods all have potential for assessing clinical changes in symptoms for groups of patients undergoing treatment, with no clear advantage with any one method.},
keywords = {*Brain Injuries/px [Psychology], *Brain Injuries/rh [Rehabilitation], *Military Personnel, *Neuropsychological Tests, adult, ambulatory care, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, UNITED States, Warfare},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}