LeBlanc, Jeanne M; McLachlan, Kaitlyn
Prevention of Post-Concussional Syndrome in North American Workers: The Importance of Early Intervention on Vocational Outcome Journal Article
In: Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2010, ISBN: 13238922.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *BRAIN -- Wounds & injuries, *OUTPATIENT medical care, *POSTCONCUSSION syndrome, *REHABILITATION, Concussion, employment, INDIVIDUALIZED education programs, INDUSTRIAL hygiene, mild traumatic brain injury, mTBI, outpatient, PCS, post-concussive syndrome, Rehabilitation, Treatment
@article{LeBlanc2010,
title = {Prevention of Post-Concussional Syndrome in North American Workers: The Importance of Early Intervention on Vocational Outcome},
author = {LeBlanc, Jeanne M and McLachlan, Kaitlyn},
isbn = {13238922},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
journal = {Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling},
volume = {16},
number = {1},
pages = {36--44},
abstract = {The purpose of this study was to: (1) Establish whether or not specific rehabilitation for mild brain injury is effective for return to work; and (2) compare the efficacy of an impairment-focused model of treatment versus an early education approach in respect to ability to return to work. Two different approaches to intervention and treatment for those with a suspected concussion from a work-related injury were utilised by an urban, interdisciplinary, outpatient rehabilitation facility. The first approach, Group Treatment (GT), provided minimal early education at time of initial intake, emphasising an extensive group-focused interdisciplinary assessment and treatment. The second approach, Individualized Education and Treatment, (IET) emphasised early education, instead coupled with specific individualised services. Both groups received employment services. Post-discharge, GT ( N = 26) resulted in 46% ( n = 12) of individuals returning to competitive employment, while IET ( N = 23) resulted in 78% ( n = 18) of individuals returning to competitive employment. An asset-oriented early individualised educational approach appears to be a more effective for employment re-engagement. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR},
keywords = {*BRAIN -- Wounds \& injuries, *OUTPATIENT medical care, *POSTCONCUSSION syndrome, *REHABILITATION, Concussion, employment, INDIVIDUALIZED education programs, INDUSTRIAL hygiene, mild traumatic brain injury, mTBI, outpatient, PCS, post-concussive syndrome, Rehabilitation, Treatment},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
LeBlanc, Jeanne M; McLachlan, Kaitlyn
Prevention of Post-Concussional Syndrome in North American Workers: The Importance of Early Intervention on Vocational Outcome Journal Article
In: Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2010, ISBN: 13238922.
@article{LeBlanc2010,
title = {Prevention of Post-Concussional Syndrome in North American Workers: The Importance of Early Intervention on Vocational Outcome},
author = {LeBlanc, Jeanne M and McLachlan, Kaitlyn},
isbn = {13238922},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
journal = {Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling},
volume = {16},
number = {1},
pages = {36--44},
abstract = {The purpose of this study was to: (1) Establish whether or not specific rehabilitation for mild brain injury is effective for return to work; and (2) compare the efficacy of an impairment-focused model of treatment versus an early education approach in respect to ability to return to work. Two different approaches to intervention and treatment for those with a suspected concussion from a work-related injury were utilised by an urban, interdisciplinary, outpatient rehabilitation facility. The first approach, Group Treatment (GT), provided minimal early education at time of initial intake, emphasising an extensive group-focused interdisciplinary assessment and treatment. The second approach, Individualized Education and Treatment, (IET) emphasised early education, instead coupled with specific individualised services. Both groups received employment services. Post-discharge, GT ( N = 26) resulted in 46% ( n = 12) of individuals returning to competitive employment, while IET ( N = 23) resulted in 78% ( n = 18) of individuals returning to competitive employment. An asset-oriented early individualised educational approach appears to be a more effective for employment re-engagement. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
LeBlanc, Jeanne M; McLachlan, Kaitlyn
Prevention of Post-Concussional Syndrome in North American Workers: The Importance of Early Intervention on Vocational Outcome Journal Article
In: Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 36–44, 2010, ISBN: 13238922.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *BRAIN -- Wounds & injuries, *OUTPATIENT medical care, *POSTCONCUSSION syndrome, *REHABILITATION, Concussion, employment, INDIVIDUALIZED education programs, INDUSTRIAL hygiene, mild traumatic brain injury, mTBI, outpatient, PCS, post-concussive syndrome, Rehabilitation, Treatment
@article{LeBlanc2010,
title = {Prevention of Post-Concussional Syndrome in North American Workers: The Importance of Early Intervention on Vocational Outcome},
author = {LeBlanc, Jeanne M and McLachlan, Kaitlyn},
isbn = {13238922},
year = {2010},
date = {2010-01-01},
journal = {Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling},
volume = {16},
number = {1},
pages = {36--44},
abstract = {The purpose of this study was to: (1) Establish whether or not specific rehabilitation for mild brain injury is effective for return to work; and (2) compare the efficacy of an impairment-focused model of treatment versus an early education approach in respect to ability to return to work. Two different approaches to intervention and treatment for those with a suspected concussion from a work-related injury were utilised by an urban, interdisciplinary, outpatient rehabilitation facility. The first approach, Group Treatment (GT), provided minimal early education at time of initial intake, emphasising an extensive group-focused interdisciplinary assessment and treatment. The second approach, Individualized Education and Treatment, (IET) emphasised early education, instead coupled with specific individualised services. Both groups received employment services. Post-discharge, GT ( N = 26) resulted in 46% ( n = 12) of individuals returning to competitive employment, while IET ( N = 23) resulted in 78% ( n = 18) of individuals returning to competitive employment. An asset-oriented early individualised educational approach appears to be a more effective for employment re-engagement. ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR},
keywords = {*BRAIN -- Wounds \& injuries, *OUTPATIENT medical care, *POSTCONCUSSION syndrome, *REHABILITATION, Concussion, employment, INDIVIDUALIZED education programs, INDUSTRIAL hygiene, mild traumatic brain injury, mTBI, outpatient, PCS, post-concussive syndrome, Rehabilitation, Treatment},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}