Hansen, C; Cushman, D; Anderson, N; Chen, W; Cheng, C; Hon, S D; Hung, M
A Normative Dataset of the Balance Error Scoring System in Children Aged between 5 and 14 Journal Article
In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 497–501, 2016.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: brain concussion, Child, pediatrics, Reference Values, Sports
@article{Hansen2016,
title = {A Normative Dataset of the Balance Error Scoring System in Children Aged between 5 and 14},
author = {Hansen, C and Cushman, D and Anderson, N and Chen, W and Cheng, C and Hon, S D and Hung, M},
doi = {10.1097/JSM.0000000000000285},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine},
volume = {26},
number = {6},
pages = {497--501},
abstract = {Objective: Pediatric head injuries occur commonly and are being reported in increasing numbers. Balance testing is a key component in the evaluation of suspected concussion, and the balance error scoring system (BESS) is likely the most well-known and widely used measure. To date, normative BESS scores for adults have been reported but not for children. Design: Normative data for BESS scores and modified BESS scores were created in a cohort of healthy children. Potential variables were analyzed as predictors of BESS performance. Setting: Local elementary and junior high schools. Participants: A total of 373 healthy children between the ages of 5 and 14. Interventions: The BESS was performed on all children. Assessment of Risk Factors: Gender, body mass index percentile, previous concussions, athletic participation, age, and the parental opinion of child's balance ability were examined as factors associated with the BESS score. Main Outcome Measures: BESS scores. Results: Normative data are reported, stratified by age groups of 5 to 7 years, 8 to 10 years, and 11 to 14 years of age, for both BESS and modified BESS. Median BESS scores are 23 for children aged 5 to 7, 18 for children aged 8 to 10, and 16 for children aged 11 to 14. Median modified BESS scores are 8 for children age 5 to 7, 5 for children age 8 to 10, and 4 for children age 11 to 14. Increasing age and positive parental opinion regarding their child's balance ability were independently correlated with decreasing BESS scores (P \< 0.01). Conclusions: The normative data on BESS scores for healthy children reported here provide age-stratified reference values for suspected balance alterations. © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {brain concussion, Child, pediatrics, Reference Values, Sports},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Haran, F J; Dretsch, M N; Slaboda, J C; Johnson, D E; Adam, O R; Tsao, J W
Comparison of baseline-referenced versus norm-referenced analytical approaches for in-theatre assessment of mild traumatic brain injury neurocognitive impairment Journal Article
In: Brain Injury, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 280–286, 2016.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], *Military Personnel/px [Psychology], adult, Brain Concussion/px [Psychology], Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reference Standards, Reference Values
@article{Haran2016b,
title = {Comparison of baseline-referenced versus norm-referenced analytical approaches for in-theatre assessment of mild traumatic brain injury neurocognitive impairment},
author = {Haran, F J and Dretsch, M N and Slaboda, J C and Johnson, D E and Adam, O R and Tsao, J W},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Brain Injury},
volume = {30},
number = {3},
pages = {280--286},
abstract = {PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To examine differences between the baseline-referenced and norm-referenced approaches for determining decrements in Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics Version 4 TBI-MIL (ANAM) performance following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). RESEARCH DESIGN: ANAM data were reviewed for 616 US Service members, with 528 of this sample having experienced an mTBI and 88 were controls. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Post-injury change scores were calculated for each sub-test: (1) normative change score = in-theater score - normative mean and (2) baseline change score = in-theater score - pre-deployment baseline. Reliable change cut-scores were applied to the change and the resulting frequency distributions were compared using McNemar tests. Receiver operator curves (ROC) using both samples (i.e. mTBI and control) were calculated for the change scores for each approach to determine the discriminate ability of the ANAM. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: There were no statistical differences, p \< 0.05 (Bonferonni-Holm corrected), between the approaches. When the area under the curve for the ROCs were averaged across sub-tests, there were no significant differences between either the norm-referenced (0.65) or baseline-referenced (0.66) approaches, p \> 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the findings suggest there is no clear advantage of using the baseline-referenced approach over norm-referenced approach.},
keywords = {*Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], *Military Personnel/px [Psychology], adult, Brain Concussion/px [Psychology], Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reference Standards, Reference Values},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Hansen, C; Cushman, D; Anderson, N; Chen, W; Cheng, C; Hon, S D; Hung, M
A Normative Dataset of the Balance Error Scoring System in Children Aged between 5 and 14 Journal Article
In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 497–501, 2016.
@article{Hansen2016,
title = {A Normative Dataset of the Balance Error Scoring System in Children Aged between 5 and 14},
author = {Hansen, C and Cushman, D and Anderson, N and Chen, W and Cheng, C and Hon, S D and Hung, M},
doi = {10.1097/JSM.0000000000000285},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine},
volume = {26},
number = {6},
pages = {497--501},
abstract = {Objective: Pediatric head injuries occur commonly and are being reported in increasing numbers. Balance testing is a key component in the evaluation of suspected concussion, and the balance error scoring system (BESS) is likely the most well-known and widely used measure. To date, normative BESS scores for adults have been reported but not for children. Design: Normative data for BESS scores and modified BESS scores were created in a cohort of healthy children. Potential variables were analyzed as predictors of BESS performance. Setting: Local elementary and junior high schools. Participants: A total of 373 healthy children between the ages of 5 and 14. Interventions: The BESS was performed on all children. Assessment of Risk Factors: Gender, body mass index percentile, previous concussions, athletic participation, age, and the parental opinion of child's balance ability were examined as factors associated with the BESS score. Main Outcome Measures: BESS scores. Results: Normative data are reported, stratified by age groups of 5 to 7 years, 8 to 10 years, and 11 to 14 years of age, for both BESS and modified BESS. Median BESS scores are 23 for children aged 5 to 7, 18 for children aged 8 to 10, and 16 for children aged 11 to 14. Median modified BESS scores are 8 for children age 5 to 7, 5 for children age 8 to 10, and 4 for children age 11 to 14. Increasing age and positive parental opinion regarding their child's balance ability were independently correlated with decreasing BESS scores (P \< 0.01). Conclusions: The normative data on BESS scores for healthy children reported here provide age-stratified reference values for suspected balance alterations. © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Haran, F J; Dretsch, M N; Slaboda, J C; Johnson, D E; Adam, O R; Tsao, J W
Comparison of baseline-referenced versus norm-referenced analytical approaches for in-theatre assessment of mild traumatic brain injury neurocognitive impairment Journal Article
In: Brain Injury, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 280–286, 2016.
@article{Haran2016b,
title = {Comparison of baseline-referenced versus norm-referenced analytical approaches for in-theatre assessment of mild traumatic brain injury neurocognitive impairment},
author = {Haran, F J and Dretsch, M N and Slaboda, J C and Johnson, D E and Adam, O R and Tsao, J W},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Brain Injury},
volume = {30},
number = {3},
pages = {280--286},
abstract = {PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To examine differences between the baseline-referenced and norm-referenced approaches for determining decrements in Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics Version 4 TBI-MIL (ANAM) performance following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). RESEARCH DESIGN: ANAM data were reviewed for 616 US Service members, with 528 of this sample having experienced an mTBI and 88 were controls. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Post-injury change scores were calculated for each sub-test: (1) normative change score = in-theater score - normative mean and (2) baseline change score = in-theater score - pre-deployment baseline. Reliable change cut-scores were applied to the change and the resulting frequency distributions were compared using McNemar tests. Receiver operator curves (ROC) using both samples (i.e. mTBI and control) were calculated for the change scores for each approach to determine the discriminate ability of the ANAM. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: There were no statistical differences, p \< 0.05 (Bonferonni-Holm corrected), between the approaches. When the area under the curve for the ROCs were averaged across sub-tests, there were no significant differences between either the norm-referenced (0.65) or baseline-referenced (0.66) approaches, p \> 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the findings suggest there is no clear advantage of using the baseline-referenced approach over norm-referenced approach.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Hansen, C; Cushman, D; Anderson, N; Chen, W; Cheng, C; Hon, S D; Hung, M
A Normative Dataset of the Balance Error Scoring System in Children Aged between 5 and 14 Journal Article
In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 497–501, 2016.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: brain concussion, Child, pediatrics, Reference Values, Sports
@article{Hansen2016,
title = {A Normative Dataset of the Balance Error Scoring System in Children Aged between 5 and 14},
author = {Hansen, C and Cushman, D and Anderson, N and Chen, W and Cheng, C and Hon, S D and Hung, M},
doi = {10.1097/JSM.0000000000000285},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine},
volume = {26},
number = {6},
pages = {497--501},
abstract = {Objective: Pediatric head injuries occur commonly and are being reported in increasing numbers. Balance testing is a key component in the evaluation of suspected concussion, and the balance error scoring system (BESS) is likely the most well-known and widely used measure. To date, normative BESS scores for adults have been reported but not for children. Design: Normative data for BESS scores and modified BESS scores were created in a cohort of healthy children. Potential variables were analyzed as predictors of BESS performance. Setting: Local elementary and junior high schools. Participants: A total of 373 healthy children between the ages of 5 and 14. Interventions: The BESS was performed on all children. Assessment of Risk Factors: Gender, body mass index percentile, previous concussions, athletic participation, age, and the parental opinion of child's balance ability were examined as factors associated with the BESS score. Main Outcome Measures: BESS scores. Results: Normative data are reported, stratified by age groups of 5 to 7 years, 8 to 10 years, and 11 to 14 years of age, for both BESS and modified BESS. Median BESS scores are 23 for children aged 5 to 7, 18 for children aged 8 to 10, and 16 for children aged 11 to 14. Median modified BESS scores are 8 for children age 5 to 7, 5 for children age 8 to 10, and 4 for children age 11 to 14. Increasing age and positive parental opinion regarding their child's balance ability were independently correlated with decreasing BESS scores (P \< 0.01). Conclusions: The normative data on BESS scores for healthy children reported here provide age-stratified reference values for suspected balance alterations. © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {brain concussion, Child, pediatrics, Reference Values, Sports},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Haran, F J; Dretsch, M N; Slaboda, J C; Johnson, D E; Adam, O R; Tsao, J W
Comparison of baseline-referenced versus norm-referenced analytical approaches for in-theatre assessment of mild traumatic brain injury neurocognitive impairment Journal Article
In: Brain Injury, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 280–286, 2016.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], *Military Personnel/px [Psychology], adult, Brain Concussion/px [Psychology], Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reference Standards, Reference Values
@article{Haran2016b,
title = {Comparison of baseline-referenced versus norm-referenced analytical approaches for in-theatre assessment of mild traumatic brain injury neurocognitive impairment},
author = {Haran, F J and Dretsch, M N and Slaboda, J C and Johnson, D E and Adam, O R and Tsao, J W},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Brain Injury},
volume = {30},
number = {3},
pages = {280--286},
abstract = {PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: To examine differences between the baseline-referenced and norm-referenced approaches for determining decrements in Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics Version 4 TBI-MIL (ANAM) performance following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). RESEARCH DESIGN: ANAM data were reviewed for 616 US Service members, with 528 of this sample having experienced an mTBI and 88 were controls. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Post-injury change scores were calculated for each sub-test: (1) normative change score = in-theater score - normative mean and (2) baseline change score = in-theater score - pre-deployment baseline. Reliable change cut-scores were applied to the change and the resulting frequency distributions were compared using McNemar tests. Receiver operator curves (ROC) using both samples (i.e. mTBI and control) were calculated for the change scores for each approach to determine the discriminate ability of the ANAM. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: There were no statistical differences, p \< 0.05 (Bonferonni-Holm corrected), between the approaches. When the area under the curve for the ROCs were averaged across sub-tests, there were no significant differences between either the norm-referenced (0.65) or baseline-referenced (0.66) approaches, p \> 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the findings suggest there is no clear advantage of using the baseline-referenced approach over norm-referenced approach.},
keywords = {*Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], *Military Personnel/px [Psychology], adult, Brain Concussion/px [Psychology], Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reference Standards, Reference Values},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}