Gilchrist, I; Moglo, K; Storr, M; Pelland, L
Effects of head flexion posture on the multidirectional static force capacity of the neck Journal Article
In: Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 37, pp. 44–52, 2016.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, Article, Biomechanics, BIOPHYSICS, body equilibrium, body posture, Cervical spine, Concussions, contact sport, cross-sectional study, Dynamometry, force, head flexion, head movement, head position, human, human experiment, Male, Muscle, muscle contraction, muscle strength, neck injury, Neck muscle, neck strength, priority journal
@article{Gilchrist2016,
title = {Effects of head flexion posture on the multidirectional static force capacity of the neck},
author = {Gilchrist, I and Moglo, K and Storr, M and Pelland, L},
doi = {10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.05.016},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Clinical Biomechanics},
volume = {37},
pages = {44--52},
abstract = {Background Neck muscle force protects vertebral alignment and resists potentially injurious loading of osteoligamentous structures during head impacts. As the majority of neck muscles generate moments about all three planes of motion, it is not clear how the force capacity of the neck might be modulated by direction of force application and head posture. The aim of our study was to measure the multidirectional moment-generating capacity of the neck and to evaluate effects of 20° of head flexion, a common head position in contact sports, on the measured capacity. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study, with 25 males, 20-30 years old, performing maximum voluntary contractions, with ballistic intent, along eight directions, set at 45° intervals in the horizontal plane of the head. Three-dimensional moments at C3 and T1 were calculated using equations of static equilibrium. The variable of interest was the impulse of force generated from 0-50 ms. Effects of direction of force application and head posture, neutral and 20° flexion, were evaluated by two-way analysis of variance and linear regression. Findings Impulse of force was lower along diagonal planes, at 45° from the mid-sagittal plane, compared to orthogonal planes (P \< 0.001). Compared to neutral posture, head flexion produced a 55.2% decrease in impulse capacity at C3 and 45.9% at T1. Interpretation The risk of injury with head impact would intrinsically be higher along diagonal planes and with a 20° head down position due to a lower moment generating capacity of the neck in the first 50 ms of force application. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {adult, Article, Biomechanics, BIOPHYSICS, body equilibrium, body posture, Cervical spine, Concussions, contact sport, cross-sectional study, Dynamometry, force, head flexion, head movement, head position, human, human experiment, Male, Muscle, muscle contraction, muscle strength, neck injury, Neck muscle, neck strength, priority journal},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Gilchrist, I; Moglo, K; Storr, M; Pelland, L
Effects of head flexion posture on the multidirectional static force capacity of the neck Journal Article
In: Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 37, pp. 44–52, 2016.
@article{Gilchrist2016,
title = {Effects of head flexion posture on the multidirectional static force capacity of the neck},
author = {Gilchrist, I and Moglo, K and Storr, M and Pelland, L},
doi = {10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.05.016},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Clinical Biomechanics},
volume = {37},
pages = {44--52},
abstract = {Background Neck muscle force protects vertebral alignment and resists potentially injurious loading of osteoligamentous structures during head impacts. As the majority of neck muscles generate moments about all three planes of motion, it is not clear how the force capacity of the neck might be modulated by direction of force application and head posture. The aim of our study was to measure the multidirectional moment-generating capacity of the neck and to evaluate effects of 20° of head flexion, a common head position in contact sports, on the measured capacity. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study, with 25 males, 20-30 years old, performing maximum voluntary contractions, with ballistic intent, along eight directions, set at 45° intervals in the horizontal plane of the head. Three-dimensional moments at C3 and T1 were calculated using equations of static equilibrium. The variable of interest was the impulse of force generated from 0-50 ms. Effects of direction of force application and head posture, neutral and 20° flexion, were evaluated by two-way analysis of variance and linear regression. Findings Impulse of force was lower along diagonal planes, at 45° from the mid-sagittal plane, compared to orthogonal planes (P \< 0.001). Compared to neutral posture, head flexion produced a 55.2% decrease in impulse capacity at C3 and 45.9% at T1. Interpretation The risk of injury with head impact would intrinsically be higher along diagonal planes and with a 20° head down position due to a lower moment generating capacity of the neck in the first 50 ms of force application. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Gilchrist, I; Moglo, K; Storr, M; Pelland, L
Effects of head flexion posture on the multidirectional static force capacity of the neck Journal Article
In: Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 37, pp. 44–52, 2016.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: adult, Article, Biomechanics, BIOPHYSICS, body equilibrium, body posture, Cervical spine, Concussions, contact sport, cross-sectional study, Dynamometry, force, head flexion, head movement, head position, human, human experiment, Male, Muscle, muscle contraction, muscle strength, neck injury, Neck muscle, neck strength, priority journal
@article{Gilchrist2016,
title = {Effects of head flexion posture on the multidirectional static force capacity of the neck},
author = {Gilchrist, I and Moglo, K and Storr, M and Pelland, L},
doi = {10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.05.016},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Clinical Biomechanics},
volume = {37},
pages = {44--52},
abstract = {Background Neck muscle force protects vertebral alignment and resists potentially injurious loading of osteoligamentous structures during head impacts. As the majority of neck muscles generate moments about all three planes of motion, it is not clear how the force capacity of the neck might be modulated by direction of force application and head posture. The aim of our study was to measure the multidirectional moment-generating capacity of the neck and to evaluate effects of 20° of head flexion, a common head position in contact sports, on the measured capacity. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study, with 25 males, 20-30 years old, performing maximum voluntary contractions, with ballistic intent, along eight directions, set at 45° intervals in the horizontal plane of the head. Three-dimensional moments at C3 and T1 were calculated using equations of static equilibrium. The variable of interest was the impulse of force generated from 0-50 ms. Effects of direction of force application and head posture, neutral and 20° flexion, were evaluated by two-way analysis of variance and linear regression. Findings Impulse of force was lower along diagonal planes, at 45° from the mid-sagittal plane, compared to orthogonal planes (P \< 0.001). Compared to neutral posture, head flexion produced a 55.2% decrease in impulse capacity at C3 and 45.9% at T1. Interpretation The risk of injury with head impact would intrinsically be higher along diagonal planes and with a 20° head down position due to a lower moment generating capacity of the neck in the first 50 ms of force application. © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
keywords = {adult, Article, Biomechanics, BIOPHYSICS, body equilibrium, body posture, Cervical spine, Concussions, contact sport, cross-sectional study, Dynamometry, force, head flexion, head movement, head position, human, human experiment, Male, Muscle, muscle contraction, muscle strength, neck injury, Neck muscle, neck strength, priority journal},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}