Lynall, R C; Schmidt, J D; Mihalik, J P; Guskiewicz, K M
The Clinical Utility of a Concussion Rebaseline Protocol after Concussion Recovery Journal Article
In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 285–290, 2016.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: assessment battery, mild traumatic brain injury, postinjury assessment
@article{Lynall2016b,
title = {The Clinical Utility of a Concussion Rebaseline Protocol after Concussion Recovery},
author = {Lynall, R C and Schmidt, J D and Mihalik, J P and Guskiewicz, K M},
doi = {10.1097/JSM.0000000000000260},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine},
volume = {26},
number = {4},
pages = {285--290},
abstract = {Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of "rebaseline" testing (ie, new baseline) before the season after an athlete's concussion recovery by (1) determining differences between baseline and rebaseline scores, and (2) comparing differences to clinical reliable change indices (RCIs). Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: Clinical research center. Patients: Thirty-four Division I collegiate athletes (16 females, 18 males; baseline age 18.38 ± 0.78 years). Interventions: Neurocognitive, balance, and symptom testing was conducted at 3 times: (1) original baseline, (2) final postinjury before return-to-play, and (3) rebaseline completed before the next competitive season. Physicians diagnosed concussions, and all concussed athletes' returned-to-play during the same season. Main Outcome Measures: Dependent variables included all neurocognitive domains, balance composite, and total symptom scores. Mean differences between sessions were compared with 80% RCIs to clinically interpret statistical findings. Results: Statistically significant improvements in neurocognitive performance were observed between baseline and rebaseline sessions: psychomotor speed (F1},
keywords = {assessment battery, mild traumatic brain injury, postinjury assessment},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Lynall, R C; Schmidt, J D; Mihalik, J P; Guskiewicz, K M
The Clinical Utility of a Concussion Rebaseline Protocol after Concussion Recovery Journal Article
In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 285–290, 2016.
@article{Lynall2016b,
title = {The Clinical Utility of a Concussion Rebaseline Protocol after Concussion Recovery},
author = {Lynall, R C and Schmidt, J D and Mihalik, J P and Guskiewicz, K M},
doi = {10.1097/JSM.0000000000000260},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine},
volume = {26},
number = {4},
pages = {285--290},
abstract = {Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of "rebaseline" testing (ie, new baseline) before the season after an athlete's concussion recovery by (1) determining differences between baseline and rebaseline scores, and (2) comparing differences to clinical reliable change indices (RCIs). Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: Clinical research center. Patients: Thirty-four Division I collegiate athletes (16 females, 18 males; baseline age 18.38 ± 0.78 years). Interventions: Neurocognitive, balance, and symptom testing was conducted at 3 times: (1) original baseline, (2) final postinjury before return-to-play, and (3) rebaseline completed before the next competitive season. Physicians diagnosed concussions, and all concussed athletes' returned-to-play during the same season. Main Outcome Measures: Dependent variables included all neurocognitive domains, balance composite, and total symptom scores. Mean differences between sessions were compared with 80% RCIs to clinically interpret statistical findings. Results: Statistically significant improvements in neurocognitive performance were observed between baseline and rebaseline sessions: psychomotor speed (F1},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Lynall, R C; Schmidt, J D; Mihalik, J P; Guskiewicz, K M
The Clinical Utility of a Concussion Rebaseline Protocol after Concussion Recovery Journal Article
In: Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 285–290, 2016.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: assessment battery, mild traumatic brain injury, postinjury assessment
@article{Lynall2016b,
title = {The Clinical Utility of a Concussion Rebaseline Protocol after Concussion Recovery},
author = {Lynall, R C and Schmidt, J D and Mihalik, J P and Guskiewicz, K M},
doi = {10.1097/JSM.0000000000000260},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
journal = {Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine},
volume = {26},
number = {4},
pages = {285--290},
abstract = {Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of "rebaseline" testing (ie, new baseline) before the season after an athlete's concussion recovery by (1) determining differences between baseline and rebaseline scores, and (2) comparing differences to clinical reliable change indices (RCIs). Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: Clinical research center. Patients: Thirty-four Division I collegiate athletes (16 females, 18 males; baseline age 18.38 ± 0.78 years). Interventions: Neurocognitive, balance, and symptom testing was conducted at 3 times: (1) original baseline, (2) final postinjury before return-to-play, and (3) rebaseline completed before the next competitive season. Physicians diagnosed concussions, and all concussed athletes' returned-to-play during the same season. Main Outcome Measures: Dependent variables included all neurocognitive domains, balance composite, and total symptom scores. Mean differences between sessions were compared with 80% RCIs to clinically interpret statistical findings. Results: Statistically significant improvements in neurocognitive performance were observed between baseline and rebaseline sessions: psychomotor speed (F1},
keywords = {assessment battery, mild traumatic brain injury, postinjury assessment},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}