Buckley, T A; Burdette, G; Kelly, K
Concussion-Management Practice Patterns of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II and III Athletic Trainers: How the Other Half Lives Journal Article
In: Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 879–888, 2015.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Athletic Injuries/th [Therapy], *Brain Concussion/th [Therapy], *Sports/ph [Physiology], Athletic Injuries/di [Diagnosis], Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Physicians', Practice Guidelines as Topic, Practice Patterns, Return to Sport/ph [Physiology], Sports Medicine/mt [Methods], Surveys and Questionnaires
@article{Buckley2015,
title = {Concussion-Management Practice Patterns of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II and III Athletic Trainers: How the Other Half Lives},
author = {Buckley, T A and Burdette, G and Kelly, K},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Athletic Training},
volume = {50},
number = {8},
pages = {879--888},
abstract = {CONTEXT: The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has published concussion-management practice guidelines consistent with recent position and consensus statements. Whereas NCAA Division I athletic trainers appear highly compliant, little is known about the concussion-management practice patterns of athletic trainers at smaller institutions where staffing and resources may be limited. OBJECTIVE: To descriptively define the concussion-management practice patterns of NCAA Division II and III athletic trainers. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Web-based questionnaire. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 755 respondents (response rate = 40.2%) from NCAA Division II and Division III institutions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measures were the rate of multifaceted concussion-assessment techniques, defined as 3 or more assessments; the specific practice patterns of each assessment battery; and tests used during a clinical examination. RESULTS: Most respondents indicated using a multifaceted assessment during acute assessment (Division II = 76.9%},
keywords = {*Athletic Injuries/th [Therapy], *Brain Concussion/th [Therapy], *Sports/ph [Physiology], Athletic Injuries/di [Diagnosis], Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Physicians', Practice Guidelines as Topic, Practice Patterns, Return to Sport/ph [Physiology], Sports Medicine/mt [Methods], Surveys and Questionnaires},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Buckley, T A; Burdette, G; Kelly, K
Concussion-Management Practice Patterns of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II and III Athletic Trainers: How the Other Half Lives Journal Article
In: Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 879–888, 2015.
@article{Buckley2015,
title = {Concussion-Management Practice Patterns of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II and III Athletic Trainers: How the Other Half Lives},
author = {Buckley, T A and Burdette, G and Kelly, K},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Athletic Training},
volume = {50},
number = {8},
pages = {879--888},
abstract = {CONTEXT: The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has published concussion-management practice guidelines consistent with recent position and consensus statements. Whereas NCAA Division I athletic trainers appear highly compliant, little is known about the concussion-management practice patterns of athletic trainers at smaller institutions where staffing and resources may be limited. OBJECTIVE: To descriptively define the concussion-management practice patterns of NCAA Division II and III athletic trainers. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Web-based questionnaire. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 755 respondents (response rate = 40.2%) from NCAA Division II and Division III institutions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measures were the rate of multifaceted concussion-assessment techniques, defined as 3 or more assessments; the specific practice patterns of each assessment battery; and tests used during a clinical examination. RESULTS: Most respondents indicated using a multifaceted assessment during acute assessment (Division II = 76.9%},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Buckley, T A; Burdette, G; Kelly, K
Concussion-Management Practice Patterns of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II and III Athletic Trainers: How the Other Half Lives Journal Article
In: Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 879–888, 2015.
Abstract | BibTeX | Tags: *Athletic Injuries/th [Therapy], *Brain Concussion/th [Therapy], *Sports/ph [Physiology], Athletic Injuries/di [Diagnosis], Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Physicians', Practice Guidelines as Topic, Practice Patterns, Return to Sport/ph [Physiology], Sports Medicine/mt [Methods], Surveys and Questionnaires
@article{Buckley2015,
title = {Concussion-Management Practice Patterns of National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II and III Athletic Trainers: How the Other Half Lives},
author = {Buckley, T A and Burdette, G and Kelly, K},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-01-01},
journal = {Journal of Athletic Training},
volume = {50},
number = {8},
pages = {879--888},
abstract = {CONTEXT: The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has published concussion-management practice guidelines consistent with recent position and consensus statements. Whereas NCAA Division I athletic trainers appear highly compliant, little is known about the concussion-management practice patterns of athletic trainers at smaller institutions where staffing and resources may be limited. OBJECTIVE: To descriptively define the concussion-management practice patterns of NCAA Division II and III athletic trainers. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Web-based questionnaire. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 755 respondents (response rate = 40.2%) from NCAA Division II and Division III institutions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measures were the rate of multifaceted concussion-assessment techniques, defined as 3 or more assessments; the specific practice patterns of each assessment battery; and tests used during a clinical examination. RESULTS: Most respondents indicated using a multifaceted assessment during acute assessment (Division II = 76.9%},
keywords = {*Athletic Injuries/th [Therapy], *Brain Concussion/th [Therapy], *Sports/ph [Physiology], Athletic Injuries/di [Diagnosis], Brain Concussion/di [Diagnosis], Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Physicians', Practice Guidelines as Topic, Practice Patterns, Return to Sport/ph [Physiology], Sports Medicine/mt [Methods], Surveys and Questionnaires},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}